User talk:ShivamAtray

Other account
Hi, are you the same user as ? Please do not use another account to get around a block. Tacyarg (talk) 13:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Sir, I would like to inform you that I am not the same user as kapdewala. My name is Shivam and I was added some content about kapdewala which was not promotion. Not even add any link and content which is promotion. But still you removed my content. When we open Wikipedia it says: Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia, created and edited by volunteers around the world. But when someone edit and contribute in Wikipedia. You guys just remove that content or block or delete.  It's is very disappointing. ShivamAtray (talk) 14:20, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

ShivamAtray (talk) 09:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
Please describe what non promotional edits you would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi! I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia and ensuring that all content adheres to the site's guidelines. i want to share my knowledge by doing nesserery edits.
 * Aslo I acknowledge the concern regarding promotional content. I appreciate the commitment to upholding Wikipedia's standards, and I would like to assure you that I am fully committed to making the necessary adjustments to address this concern.
 * To rectify the promotional nature of the page, I propose the following non-promotional edits:
 * 1. I will revise the content to maintain a neutral and objective tone, ensuring that the language used does not overly promote the subject.
 * 2. I will strengthen the page's credibility by adding more verifiable citations and references from reliable sources, thus enhancing the article's overall reliability.
 * 3. I will ensure that the page conforms to the encyclopedic style guidelines, providing a balanced and informative overview without sounding overly promotional.
 * 4. I will further highlight the subject's notability by emphasizing significant achievements and contributions in a manner consistent with Wikipedia's guidelines.
 * I understand and respect the Wikipedia community's dedication to maintaining high standards, and I am committed to working collaboratively to address any concerns and create a page that aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines.
 * Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to the opportunity to contribute valuable, non-promotional content to Wikipedia.
 * Best regards, ShivamAtray (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The subtext is that you are talking about editing about Kapdewala. Before you can do that, you will need to show the ability to edit non promotionally. What constructive edits not connected with Kapdewala would you make? Also, you created that artspam on your WP:user page. Articles do not go on user pages. Any new articles would need to be via the WP:AFC process for vetting and checking. Thanks --  Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)