User talk:Shivasharanappa

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Panchacharyas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Panchacharyas was changed by Shivasharanappa (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-02-11T19:52:16+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Yossiea (talk) 20:15, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Lingayatism edits
Your edits in Lingayatism was not very good, sorry to say. Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia, and the text shall be neutral in tone according to a Wikipedia policy called Neutral point of view. If you have one widespread opinion and there are other opposing widespread opinions, both opinions should be in the article, not only your. The article shall clearly write that those opinions are opinions. Personal opinions such as this:
 * the selfish oppose them, to earn their selfis things

should not be written in the article, because they are clearly outside their context.

You can always protest against opinions on the talk page of the article. If you oppose an individual sentence in the text that is already written, you have the opportunity to use the templates which inserts a little text [citation needed] that will be dealt with in time, or if you decide that the sentence is outrightly wrong, you could use, , that inserts [dubious – discuss]. If the entire article is full of opinions that are dubious, you could opt to put the text (capital letters!), or in milder cases. Always try to explain your objections as much as possible on the talk page. If you feel that your opinion in the topic is an opinion shared by many adherents, then your improvements to the article should preferrably be to add your opinion beside the one that is written now. Always try to explain your standpoint on the talk page. Don't delete material without consulting the other editors on the talk page. The purpose of the talk page is to create a consensus on how all opinions are going to be balanced in order to get a neutral objective article that explains everything from all standing points. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 19:11, 18 February 2009 (UTC)