User talk:Shlimozzle

Children of Dune
I've reverted your new addition to the Children of Dune because, as well-written as it is, that kind of unsourced analysis is considered original research. As editors we are not allowed to draw conclusions or contrast works this way. If you can find a reliable outside source which makes these points, by all means paraphrase or quote them and provide references (I can help you with the technical aspects of this if you need assistance). Again, I do not disagree with or dislike what you have written, but the bulk of it is inappropriately presented. TAnthony 21:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello, TAnthony.
 * I'm sure you've forgotten by now, but you re-edited some original-opinion-type contextual comments I added to the CHILDREN OF DUNE page, and left me a note about it.
 * I just wanted tot hank you for taking the trouble to let me know; I'm new to Wikipedia, and since I have strongly-held (and, i flatter myself, well-reasoned) opinions about my favorite fiction, it's better to learn what's OK and not OK sooner rather than later.
 * So thanks again.
 * It's a little sad, though - I'm sure that it's for the best, but it does feel like the proscription of "original research" prohibits some really wonderful critical reflection, especially when it comes to works of fiction or other imaginative work. Not complaining, just pondering.
 * Anyway, thanks again.
 * Shlimozzle 01:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message; I certainly didn't object to the content or quality of your work. And of course, a less-strict member of the "Dune police" basically put it back with a "needs sources" message (an I didn't object). I could've done the same, but I don't know that any references will surface, and ultimately unsourced material has to go.
 * It is indeed a little annoying in many cases that "original" critical analysis has no place here, but that's just not what Wikipedia is. There are other wikis devoted only to Dune that may be more accepting. In any case, thanks for your contributions and keep on editing! &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 04:25, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BakyEndre.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:BakyEndre.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Siege of Budapest
Thank you for great images. Hope they don't get deleted. I will use one of them in another article also--mrg3105 (comms) ♠ ♥ ♦ ♣ 12:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Austro-Prussian War has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  SJP Chat  18:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. It was a careless on my part. You did nothing wrong, and I appreciate that edit:-) I'm mainly a vandal fighter, and I use a tools called Huggle. What happened was I saw vandalism, and hit the revert button, but it switched to your version right before I hit the revert button, and it reverted your version instead. I'm usually good at noticing when that happens, but I guess I missed it this time:-P Sorry about that! Happy editing:-D-- SJP Chat  18:37, 7 July 2008 (UTC)



 SJP Chat  has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.


 * No problem, and thank you for being understanding:-) I really appreciate it. Happy editing! if you have a question feel free to ask me.-- SJP Chat  01:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Re:Huggle
My apologies for that. I knew it was a mistake, but apparently I forgot to fix it... (I saw "Mad King Ludwig" and reflexed :/ ) Sorry about that. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 00:07, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Ludwig II of Bavaria
Thanks for your work on Ludwig II of Bavaria; some of it looks pretty good. However, two sections, Ludwig II of Bavaria and Ludwig II of Bavaria, are still a little repetitive and should be merged further, and parts of Buildings, especially Linderhof, were left in a bad state through the cutting and pasting. I'm not sure of everything you did and what you wanted so I am hesitant to make any major changes. If you can, please finish the good job you started on this article, and you may want to use the German Wikipedia's edition as a guide. Thanks! Reywas92 Talk 21:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Szalasioath.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Szalasioath.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.


 * The 48 hours is for Wikipedia, on Commons its longer. A license is missing: As a 1945 photo this is not public domain in any case, the copyright term is 70 years following the photographers death, so minimum 70 years. A source (where was this published) is completely missing. --Martin H. (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:LancHid45.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:LancHid45.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 14:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:3b13026r.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:3b13026r.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:33, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Avery Brundage FA
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for editorial efforts that helped Avery Brundage become a WP:FA.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:HorthyPacelli.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HorthyPacelli.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:HitHorth.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HitHorth.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:YoungEndre.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:YoungEndre.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:BakyEndre.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:BakyEndre.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Helle Crafts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westport ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Murder_of_Helle_Crafts check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Murder_of_Helle_Crafts?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alain C. White has been accepted
 Alain C. White, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Alain_C._White help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 07:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)