User talk:Shockofsputnik

Disambiguation link notification for June 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Florence Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter White ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Florence_Rose check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Florence_Rose?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dázon Dixon Diallo


Hello, Shockofsputnik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dázon Dixon Diallo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:01, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Women's School for Planning and Architecture
Hello, Shockofsputnik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Women's School for Planning and Architecture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Women's School for Planning and Architecture


Hello, Shockofsputnik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Women's School for Planning and Architecture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Shockofsputnik! Your additions to Women of Color Resource Center have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 12:57, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Mary Metlay Kaufman
Hi, and thanks for an article off to a fantastic start! I was wondering if you would be interested to nominate the article for Did you know (DYK).

If you haven't done a DYK nomination before, I would be happy to help (or even nominate the article on your behalf). Just note that it should be done within seven days of the article's creation.

Otherwise, it does seem to me like the page is well on its way to be recognized as a good article, which has its own review process. = paul2520 💬 02:31, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the kind note and encouraging words! I have a busy week so I’m not sure that nomination is the right thing for me to be working on right now but I would definitely support you putting in a nomination. Thanks so much! Shockofsputnik (talk) 12:45, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. I should be able to. = paul2520 💬 18:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi ! Not sure if you saw the updates on Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Metlay Kaufman. Are you interested in either/or (1) adding additional text to the page, so it meets the "1,500 bytes of prose" that aren't copied from CC-by-SA sources? OR (2) working on nominating this as a good article? I'd be happy to help with the latter, but I'd defer to you for additional references for (1). = paul2520 💬 15:40, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the late reply! The semester is starting and things are busy. This is a bit complicated. Part of the reason I work on wikipedia articles as part of my professional work is that it's important to surface stories of people who haven't had a lot of academic acknowledgement -- but it's a chicken-and-egg problem, because it means that there aren't too many secondary sources to cite! I would love to see this move forward but it's probably unrealistic for me to spend more work time doing this. Thank you for everything you've done to make this more visible! Shockofsputnik (talk) 17:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)