User talk:Shoessss/Archive Dec 2007

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 19:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Minisub
Deleted text posted to User:Shoessss/Minisub. Best,  BLACK KITE  01:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

WebCT
Stop erasing my work. I am not violating anything and you know it. I am submitting relevant information that needs to be posted. You have an agenda and you need to stop and DO NOT THREATEN to block me.Spellmanloves67 (talk) 19:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment – Sorry to say you are "violating" policy. You must source your allegations with both reliable and verifiable sources.  I’m sorry, the one you listed, for numerous changes to the article, falls more than a tad short of this requirement. . By the way…. Happy Holidays. Shoessss |  Chat  21:02, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * What policy am I violating? Your personal opinion? Stop erasing my facts that are relevant. You are creating an EDIT WAR. STOP. What reason do you have?Spellmanloves67 (talk) 23:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ‘’’Comment’’’ – First the 3RR.  Second, you are posting WP:POV.  Until you can verify and cite, post and substantiate the claims it is a NO….  and again Happy Holidays. Shoessss |  Chat  00:04, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

hi
Hi, It is a well known fact that the Calcutta "riots" were started by "Direct Action" of Suharwardy. Concelling this fact, and 'secularising' this disaster by throwing the allegation at 'all' communities is something absurd and unjustifiable like Holocaust Denial. It is not going to help anyone (not even your muslim "brothers"). Hey Ram was an incrediblly daring and to-the-point thing, an extremly rare piece of work in our shamelessly secular society. The least we can do is to tell world what this movie meant. (Such films are not made everyday because of censor.)However if your POV is too dear to you you can keep it your way. You can even put 100% blame on the hindus, if you think that will bring communal harmony.

Jon Ascton (talk)
 * Comment – Hey Jon Ascton talk the one thing I can say about Wikipedia is that a majority of the Editors are more than willing, as you put it to take that ; “..incredibly daring and to-the-point thing” article and improve upon it. However, the one thing that will not be tolerate, is an individual pushing her/his WP:POV point of view to the extent that it disallows other individuals, groups or other affected parties to express their thoughts.  In the mean time, as an individual, with his or her own believes, “Happy Holidays".  Shoessss |  Chat  20:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
bias Osteen attacking Vostok

Re: Hi
Yes, that is what I wanted to say : Wiki is no place for one's opinions, of course. That fact is clear as day - I have no dispute with that. We are all educated enough to understand that what an encyclopedia is.

Here we are telling what the movie Hey Ram is all about, not what we, or I or anyone may think  it should have been. The movie was what it was, and may be unacceptable to some ( it was censored ).Hey Ram was made to break the myth that 1947 partition riots were started by all the communities at the same time ! They guys who wrote the script of the movie may be wrong, but when writing about the movie we should be strictly objective.

Jon Ascton (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:30, 25 December 2007 (UTC)