User talk:Shortright

Andrew Sords
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andrew Sords, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Please read the guide to donating your own copyrighted material to Wikipedia. Note that, in addition to copyright requirements, the article must still comply with notability guidelines, advertising prohibition and avoid conflicts of interest. &mdash; Coren (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion discussion abd copyright violation
Hi Shortright, first off I'd like to welcome you to Wikipedia, and thank you for your efforts to improve the encyclopedia. I just looked over the page on Andrew Swords, and it indeed seems that the article as it stands is a copyright violation. We really can't accept any material that is copyrighted, even if you hold the copyright yourself. This is because of how wikipedia is licenced itself for reuse. It seems indeed likely that the text originates from here http://www.andrewsords.com/content/view/26/40/. If you are the holder of that copyright, you have the option of releasing the text in the public domain, or releasing it under a licence that is compatable with Wikipedias licence. You can find more information on WP:COPYRIGHT. A far better alternative is to rewrite the article from scratch, preferable using reliable, independent sources. Right now, I will remove the text that violates copyright from the article (that is, most of the article), and make it a stub. It could be expanded from there again, if it survives the deletion debate. I hope this clears things up. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

I am ok with rewriting this... however I can't even find the stub to work from there. Help? Shortright (talk) 16:20, 16 January 2008 (UTC)