User talk:Shot info/ACE2008

Oh gosh. I am anti-science? Please tell me which action or answer to my questions has led you to that opinion. Something needs to be fix here!! John Vandenberg (chat) 04:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry John, just my opinion based on past interactions with you (not just your responses to the questions). To me you seem to jump all over the pro-science editors while letting the more civil POV pushing anti-science editors off.  This is only my impression, but it is however enough for me to judge you with the (perhaps unfairly) label of "anti-science".  Shot info (talk) 04:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Surely you can think of something to underpin this label. Please.  I'd like something to work on here.  here is my answer to the SPOV/NPOV query.  You can call me a prick and I wouldn't care ... but this ... ouch!  anything but this.  It is akin to saying I like going to the library and ripping pages out of books.  I'll not pester you about; you're entitled to your opinions and to keep your cards to your chest if that's what's going on; this is my final plea. John Vandenberg (chat) 04:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I must appriciate the fact that you actually do care about this. So here is a comprimise.  I will make it neutral for the moment and will do some more reading.  Now it may be that my first impression of you was in a piece of admin related dramaz and perhaps you weren't on the "correct" side (IMHO).  But let me do some more reading and make the necessary change.  Shot info (talk) 05:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sure you will find within my candidacy plenty of better reasons to oppose me ;-) I do hope you find more good than bad; feel free to ask any questions that linger in your mind after having read my existing answers. John Vandenberg (chat) 07:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)