User talk:Shreklover69

October 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Shrek, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  McDoob AU93  19:29, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jackson Pollock, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Jackson Pollock was changed by Shreklover69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.988885 on 2014-10-23T19:31:59+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Blake Anderson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Blake Anderson was changed by Shreklover69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986206 on 2014-10-23T19:34:18+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)