User talk:Shreyanjali16

check out this link...How to create a new Article Debastein1 (talk) 18:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Article selection ok. - Shirin --Shirin tejani (talk) 04:48, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

It seems that there is already alot of material up on the topic of your choice. Can you explain what exactly will be your contribution? - Shirin (09 August 2011)


 * }Gsinghglakes (talk) 06:44, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

An Invite to join the India Education Program
naveenpf (talk) 19:05, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Foreign Education Provider Bill in India


A tag has been placed on Foreign Education Provider Bill in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. → ROUX  ₪  20:20, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Foreign Education Provider Bill in India
I saw your comment on roux's talk page, so here's some info: While some portions of text can be taken from the bill, they will have to be within quotation marks to indicate that they are not your own work. Also, Wikipedia is not a repository for legislation, as an encyclopaedia, what we do on Wikipedia is provide commentary on the legislation. So, what you'll have to do is find sources such as commentary by legal experts, education experts, newspapers etc that explain different aspects of the bill and then paraphrase those into your own words. Rather than create the article in main space, do so at User:Shreyanjali16/Foreign Education Provider Bill in India and when you have added references and we know that it meets Wikipedia's requirements, we can move it to article space. A quick guide for you (work in progress) is available at User:SpacemanSpiff/S3/IEP/FAQ, see the questions and answers at the top to figure out how you should paraphrase, source etc. Let me know if you have any question -- you can do so right at this talk page, immediately after this post. Just start your post with a colon ":" and when replying to posts, make sure to add one additional ":" to the number in the previous post. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  07:39, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * thank you for replying. I will be working on the necessary changes you have asked me to make. But I would request you to restore the rest of the article only if you do not find any copyvios in those sections. As per the suggestions given to me I will work on the Bill part on my sand box and once I have completed I shall post you the link to my sand box for your verification. thank you for helping out.

Shreyanjali16 (talk) 09:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Please reply on the talk page where the initial conversation is. If you wish to alert the person that you have responded then you can place on their talk page. I have copied the above response from you at the talk page of the faq as this is where our discussion started and should continue.
 * In the article, your introduction "A Bill to regulate...incidental thereto." is a verbatim copy of the Bill proposal.
 * Next, your text reads "The Bill was approved by the union Cabinet in March this year and was introduced in the Lok Sabha on May 3, 2010." while the source reads "The foreign universities bill was approved by the union Cabinet in March this year (2010) and was introduced in the Lok Sabha on May 3, 2010."
 * The above does not qualify as paraphrasing, and most of the article is exactly like this and therefore can not be restored. An example of how to suitably paraphrase the above sentence is "The Foreign Universities Bill was tabled in the Lok Sabha in May 2010 about two months after discussion by the Union Cabinet." cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  11:21, 14 September 2011 (UTC)