User talk:Shrikantbhalerao101

Welcome!

Hello, Shrikantbhalerao101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Soman (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

COI
Judging from your first 4 edits, it would seem that there might be a WP:COI issue at hand. Please go through that guideline. --Soman (talk) 07:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:COI and WP:POV blanking of referenced content on Gopal Kundu
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Gopal Kundu. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gopal_Kundu&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Andy Dingley (talk) 10:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gopal Kundu


A tag has been placed on Gopal Kundu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  17:57, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cancer research by Gopal Kundu


The article Cancer research by Gopal Kundu has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:Original Research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. aηsuмaη  ༽Ϟ  10:02, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Cancer research by Gopal Kundu
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Cancer research by Gopal Kundu, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/70/24/10381.abstract. As a copyright violation, Cancer research by Gopal Kundu appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Cancer research by Gopal Kundu has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Cancer research by Gopal Kundu and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Cancer research by Gopal Kundu with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cancer research by Gopal Kundu.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gopal Kundu


A tag has been placed on Gopal Kundu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  21:26, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Your addition to Gopal Kundu has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  21:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr Gopal Kundu


The article Dr Gopal Kundu has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  . Shlok  talk. 10:41, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, as you did with Dr Gopal Kundu, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  . Shlok  talk. 11:44, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons prods without addressing the issue, as you did at Dr Gopal Kundu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr Gopal Kundu


The article Dr Gopal Kundu has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Bentogoa (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gopal Kundu


The article Gopal Kundu has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability. No independent sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Gopal Kundu
Hello, Shrikantbhalerao101, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/Gopal Kundu whether the article Gopal Kundu should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Gopal Kundu, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! JamesBWatson (talk) 10:59, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Please be aware that, unlike "proposed deletion" tags, the "article for deletion" tag MAY NOT BE REMOVED from the article. -- 202.124.72.235 (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Warning
This is your last warning. The next time you edit Wikipedia disruptively, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I thought carefully about whether to block you because of your recent removal of an "Article for Deletion" notice from Gopal Kundu. Although you had not specifically been warned about AfD notices, you had certainly been warned enough times about other similar removals, quite enough that you should have been aware of the need to check before doing this. If you did check then you will have seen the message saying "this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed". In fact, the only reason I decided against blocking you immediately was that I had decided to withdraw the AfD nomination anyway. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:49, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Please do not post multiple copies of the same post to multiple pages. Doing so wastes people's time, as people who do not know that your query has already been addressed can spend time duplicating work already done by others. There is also a danger that it may give the impression that you are trying to bias the outcome, by searching around in the hope that out of many people you approach at least one will support the line you want. You may like to read WP:FORUMSHOP. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:19, 10 November 2011 (UTC)