User talk:Shrikanthv/Archive 1

Hi I am interested to get in touch regarding information on this page. Can you please write to me on agr.parul@gmail.com

Study Wikipedia policy
Wikipedia has a sizable set of policies and guidelines that you do not appear to be aware of. It is not a free place to get your message out to the world but an well organized project that supports volunteers in building an encyclopedia and the rules are there for that reason. I imagine it is frustrating to be blocked from participating in the project, especially if participation is related to your job, but I think you will have more success in getting unblocked if you start by becoming very familiar with the policies and guidelines before asserting your value to the project. For example, it appears that you attempted to avoid your block by starting a new account (User:Vshrikanth) with which you continued in behavior that violated policy on promotional content. You probably were unaware that it was a serious violation of policy to do that. Rather than charging ahead with claims of being useful to the project, I think your chances would be much better if you showed some signs of having studied the policies and guidelines in which you are now seriously entangled. Here are some articles that might help you figure out how things work and perhaps how to extract yourself from the mess you're in (assuming that's possible at this point): If you have any questions, please post them here or on my talk page. Joja lozzo  16:28, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Abuse of alternative accounts (sock puppets)
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * Wikimedia Commons licensing
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links

Speedy deletion declined: Larsen & Toubro
Hello Shrikanthv. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Larsen & Toubro, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: needs clean up, not deletion. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 20:48, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Trying to get articles on your competitors deleted is still only a promotion a your company's interests and thus violates WP:Conflict of interest. If the goal of your edits is not the betterment of Wikipedia then I have to ask you to stop editing entirely. This is not helpful. Amalthea  20:57, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello please do not misunderstand, i do not know who is whoes competitor and have no intention to part with any one, i was simply trying to remove self promoting advertisments and nothing else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrikanthv (talk • contribs) 11:44, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * OK. Both companies produce electronics, when you marked them for deletion it appeared self-evident that you were still motivated by promoting your company's interests. Nonetheless, if you have concerns with similar pages, I would strongly advise you to bring them to me or any other administrator next time. Amalthea  12:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Upanishads. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:51, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:Ian.thomson. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Also, please demonstrate on Talk:Upanishads how the information in the article does not match the sources cited. Simply tagging after previously unbalancing gives the impression you are acting with an agenda. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Collaborating
I see you are engaged in a conflict at Upanishads. Editors who have difficulty working collegially will eventually lose the privilege of editing entirely and I think you may be at risk in that way. I think you may be able to avoid most of these conflicts by using the article talk pages more and asking more questions instead of asserting your position. Try asking why something is be said a certain way rather than just editing it the way you want it. I also advise against using any of the article deletion or rating tools until you are more familiar with them. Abusing them is also going to contribute to a reputation for disruptive editing. Joja lozzo  15:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

I hope you will see my advice as helpful. You have started out editing Wikipedia very aggressively and I do not think your confrontational approach is going to achieve the results you wish for, on the contrary it's likely to get you banned permanently from the project. Wikipedia is not a place where editors own ideas or needs take priority. I think you can see how aggressive debate is reflected back to you in kind and I think that if you attempt a more humble approach in the future you will not only generate more cooperation but also more willingness in others to explain the how and why of current article content and to listen to your ideas for how and why we might improve it. I advise you to ask questions in a respectful manner rather than making accusations or stating blanket objections. Do your best to show good faith that others are attempting to develop an encyclopedia that is fair and accurate just as you are. Joja lozzo  16:31, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page DC injection braking do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Joja lozzo  17:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Adding scripts
Namaskara Shrikanth, if you didn't know, the Indian community decided not to include Indic scripts in articles, like the ones you added to Bangalore. For your reference, this is the link to the discussion. Please avoid adding scripts in native languages to articles. Thank you for your work!  Lynch 7  09:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Removing content at Variable-frequency drive
I understand that you object to the removal of information you posted to Variable-frequency drive about specific products. If you think there is good reason to keep that content then you need to make that argument on the article's talk page. To remove other content on specific products is most likely going to bring administrative action against you and will do nothing to restore the content that you are interested in. I recommend you undo your recent deletions as a sign of your good faith in our community processes, then go to the talk page and post your arguments either for restoring the content you wish to see on the page or for deleting the content you do not think belongs there. Joja lozzo  15:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Variable-frequency drive (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Generator, Rotor, Shaft and Synchronous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

AfD
You might want to rephrase your latest contributions to the List of Iyers AfD. Most of what you say is incomprehensible to me. - Sitush (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Away
Hi Shrikanth, sorry, was away for a few weeks (and will be on and off for a few more), sorry couldn't respond to your talk page posts.  Lynch 7  08:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Removal of links
Please do not remove legitimate links from articles, as you did recently with regard to Siddha Yoga. It's disruptive behaviour which is likely to result in sanctions. Regards, Gatoclass (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Replied on the article talk page. Gatoclass (talk) 13:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

AN
&mdash; goethean &#2384; 17:46, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Interwiki links
Please stop placing interwiki links to the tops of articles. They belong on the bottom, with the rest of the interwiki links. See Help:Interlanguage_links. -- Neil N   talk to me  23:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Braking chopper Good Article nomination
Hi Shrikanthv. I regret to inform you that I have failed your GA nomination of Braking chopper. See the review page for advice on what needs fixing. You might want to review the good article criteria and possibly think of sending an article or two to peer review until you get the hang of what is expected. I notice you have other articles nominated. DC injection braking is also a long way from being a Good article and has many of the same problems as Braking Chopper. Variable-frequency drive is better, but still needs quite a bit of work (short lead, overciting, misplaced citations). Don't be discouraged, getting a Good article can be difficult. AIR corn (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

white people/black people
Hi Shrikanthv - the other editor has now gone ahead and created what appear to be two new WP:POVFORK pages, White (skin color) and Black (skin color). Much of the material is basically just a copy and paste of what he previously added to the "black people" and "white people" articles and argued for in the rfc.

Note the intros:


 * "The terms white or light-skinned are used as social descriptions for humans who have light-coloured skin[1] or are marked by the slight pigmentation of the skin.[2][3]"


 * "The terms black or dark-skinned as descriptions for people are used to describe various population groups having dark pigmentation of the skin relative to other lighter-skinned groups represented in a particular social context.[1][2] The term describes belonging to or denoting any human group having dark-coloured skin[3][4][5] The term is specifically used for dark-skinned peoples of Africa, Australia, and Oceania but the general definition of the term "black" extends to any humans characterized by dark skin[6]."

It is literally the same skin color-based classification scheme that he has been arguing for all along on the respective articles. This is despite the reached consensus that the "white" and "black" social constructs are independent of skin color and are to be discussed on the "white people" and "black people" articles, respectively; the biology of human skin coloration would likewise be dealt with separately. It unfortunately doesn't end there, though, because he has also apparently created a Template:Skin colors, where he links to these fork pages. I have commented on this latest development on the rfc. When and if you have the time, your thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Kind regards Soupforone (talk) 19:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:07, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not be disheartened
Nominating Devita Saraf as an article for deletion was a sensible thing to do. You have serious doubts about the article and this is a key place to get a community consensus about your doubts vs the article's validity or otherwise. I'd very much like to have been able to agree with your nomination and support you. But that is an emotional thing. I find the article to be distasteful. But it is, technically, an article about a person whose notability is sufficient to merit an article. I think the article we have at present ought not to be the form the eventual article takes. I have already pruned some dead wood from it.

For the future keep your enthusiasm and sense of fair play in the forefront of your mind. And do something wise with this AfD: Treat it as a fire and forget missile. It will either hit the target or not. Move ahead with something else and let it do what it will do unaided by further input from you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:23, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


 * And again Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: .orga.in
Hi Shrikanthv. Just a note to let you know that I've declined your CSD tag on .orga.in; nothing on the page suggests that it's a hoax. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲‍水 07:09, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

SVS Educational Institutions
SVS Educational Institutions is not an advert article please remove Db-inc Template Thanks. Ramesh Ramaiah  talk  12:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * I've removed the speedy deletion template because educational institutions are not eligible for speedy deletion under the importance (A7) criteria. -- Mrmatiko (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for revert User Shrikanthv's edit at SVS Educational Institutions article. Ramesh Ramaiah   talk  13:21, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Hi Shrikanthv. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for SVS College of Engineering, Coimbatore, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. ''Please note that educational institutions are not applicable to the A7 criteria for speedy deletion. '' Cindy  ( talk to me ) 18:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  08:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Krishnath College School
Please do not accuse another editor of vandalism for deleting a prod notice. See WP:PROD. Prod notices may be removed by any editor and once deleted should not be restored. Take to AfD instead. -- Necrothesp (talk) 17:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Deprod Neo-Advaita
I have removed the prod tag from Neo-Advaita, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks! Joshua Jonathan (talk) 18:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Please read the article and the Talk Page again, and carefully; the article is critical of neo-Advaita. Actually I think you'll easily agree with the critics. Joshua Jonathan (talk) 18:09, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Sreelakshmi Suresh
If you seriously believe me to have a WP:COI with the article, then you need to put that forward through WP:ANI, and openly accuse me -- at which point I would be happy to defend myself. You, however, can't simply go to an article and undo an editors contributions on speculation with no proof and assume that is okay. If you did any searching, you would see that I belong to several Canadian Wikipedia projects and edit heavily on a wide range of Western topics. Sreelakshmi Suresh is the only India-related and tech-related article I regularly edit as part of my long history defending its rights per WP:GNG in 2007.

Per WP:VANDAL, you need to be very careful when accusing someone of "vandalism" as you did in your edit summary. Know that I am an established editor in good standing as long as 2006 with over 10,000 edits. Assume good faith when dealing with other established editors. If you accuse me of vandalism, and truly believe that I am a vandal, then we need to take this also to ANI. I take vandalism accusations very seriously. Mkdw talk 21:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Would like to add a few lines here. To Shrikanthv - Though the story of the girl (Sreelakshmi Suresh) shows the un-ethical way of boosting and promoting a normal girl without any exceptional skills, and the media blindly post news articles about her, according to the Wikipedia Notability Rules, the article deserve a place here. I was behind this for long but now I understand the way the system works and the rules. The much heated up AFD that we had few days back (4th nomination for deletion) also helped us to edit the article by many people in a pretty good manner and to make it pretty neat. Only two points get importance in the Wikipedia article now, that is she is a web designer and that she won the 'National Child Award for Exceptional Achievement 2008'. For the latest edit made by Mkdw, I do not think he violated any rules or it is vandalism. What he added is, the girl is a web designer and she got some media attention - which is actually true.

--LVerina (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Rachana Shah: speedy A7 contested (again)
Hi Shrikanthv, as you'll see from the history of Rachana Shah, shortly after the article was created by another user, an admin declined an A7 speedy deletion, as notability has been clearly asserted. See also the talk page. More likely a case for afd? Regards,  Esowteric + Talk  11:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Adoption
Hi Shrikanthv. As I mentioned in my brief note on Saturday, I've be very happy to adopt you and help you naviagate the waters of Wikipedia. I see from looking over your contributions that you've already been involved in a number of areas, particularly deletion processes, which is good to see.

I tend to be a rather hands-off mentor - I will look over your edits every now and then and raise anything I think was done particularly well, or that could have been handled differently; and I'll happily answer any questions you have - but if you'd prefer a more structured, task orientated approach I can do that instead; just let me know. It would help me to know what sort of areas you'd specifically like to edit in, and what you think you need the most help with; I can then tailor my approach accordingly.

I'm looking forward to working with you and helping you make Wikipedia better! Yunshui 雲‍水 06:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Rachana Shah continued
Yes, you're quite right. I have removed "Her endurance of the year-long ordeal ... ...": (1) It's unreliably sourced and (2) It's non-essential. Please remember to assume good faith.  Esowteric + Talk  16:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

See: Articles for deletion/Rachana Shah (2nd nomination). Regards,  Esowteric + Talk  16:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: India?
Hello Shrikanthv. Just to let you know, this article does not meet our criteria for speedy deletion. Please be sure you are familiar with the criteria before tagging Thanks. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Rachana Shah continued... again
Hi Shrikanthv. I've also !voted to delete the article at the AfD discussion. Your analysis of the sources is pretty accurate. However, the main issue is not the verifiability of the text - for the most part, the sources do verify what's said in the article. Verification is separate from notability, and that's where the article fails the inclusion criteria - because Mrs Shah has not received significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources, she doesn't meet the basic notability requirements.

The distinction between the two is important - verifiability, while a core policy, doesn't govern which subjects get articles written about them. It's possible to have an article, like this one, where everything in the text is verifiable and yet the article as a whole should still be deleted. Notability is the criteria for a subject to be included, verifiability is the criteria for information about that subject to be included. In other words, WP:N says who and what we write about, WP:V says what we write about them.

I hope that makes some sense! Yunshui 雲‍水 07:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Deletion
Hi Shrikanthv. I've had a glance over your recent contributions, and I'm seeing a lot of work in the area of deletion. That's not a problem - I spend a great deal of my own wiki-time working in CSD, so it's good that we have a shared "interest" - but you seem to have a relatively high rate of misses, with a lot of your CSD tags being declined for one reason or another. Reading through the deletion policy again is always a good idea, but you might also find this essay of mine a helpful (and more concise!) read.

Since you use Twinkle, it might be helpful for both of us if you created a CSD log to keep track of your nominations. To do this, go to the Twinkle preferences panel and near the bottom of the Speedy Deletion section, tick the box labelled "Keep a log in userspace of all CSD nominations". This will create the subpage User:Shrikanthv/CSD log, and every time you place a CSD tag, Twinkle will automatically keep a record on that page. Mine, for example, is here: User:Yunshui/CSD log.

If you think it would be helpful, I can spend some time devising a short test for you to help you towards a better understanding of the CSD criteria; let me know if you'd like this. Otherwise, feel free to ask me if you're thinking about tagging a page for deletion but aren't sure whether it meets the criteria. Cheers, Yunshui 雲‍水 07:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


 * thank you Mr Yunshi, created csd log (CSD is really a stress buster for me). yes i can see i need a test may be for tagging csd, as some of educational institute were tagged before, so would be really great. and thanks for all the help Shrikanthv (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay, have a crack at this CSD test, then. Let me know when you're done and I'll review. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 13:35, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Some more work needed here. I've marked the answers you gave - for the incorrect ones, I've left some more information to point you in the right direction. Have another go at the ones marked with . Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 02:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Definite improvments: 7/10. Your two main problems seem to be a tendency to overuse G11 - it's only for pages that clearly exist only to promote their subject - and an over-keenness to apply the CSD tags. Remember, no-one's forcing you to make a decision on whether or not to list an article for deletion; if you're at all unsure, just leave it alone. I regularly come across CSDs that I'm not certain of - in such cases, rather than deleting them and hoping for the best, I leave them for another admin to look at. If you have any doubts, just move on to something else; there are lots of other editors here who can make the choice instead! Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Sanjay Pugalia
Shrikanthv, Please read the Sanjay Pugalia entry in light of it most recent changes, which includes a notability statement, better organization, further citation, and new material. Currently, its assessment is stub. The most recent changes should merit a reconsideration of a nomination to delete and possibly a raise in status from stub to start. I would be interested in your thoughts. Thank you, Crtew (talk) 05:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Janaseva vidya kendra.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:30, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined at Jolly P Joy
In fairness, you can't access the previously deleted version of this page, so you weren't to know that it was substantially different (it is, trust me). However, it would have been worth taking note of the sources and considering whether the article in its present state merited deletion, especially since an AfD had already been started. Just because an article has been deleted via AfD before doesn't necessarily mean that the subject isn't worth having an article on at all. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I had started myself the AFD but while doing i found it was deleted before so thought it was matching G4, if this is not G4 then what kind of articles are G4 ? Shrikanthv (talk) 12:57, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * G4 applies specifically to cases where the recreated article is basically the same as the deleted one. The problem is that there's no real way for non-admins to know whether that's actually the case; you have to read the deletion discussion and try to extrapolate what the article must have looked like. In this case, the original article had one (poor) reference, and so deletion was the natural result - the recreation has a lot more information and a number of additional references. That said, your AfD was still a sensible thing to do, there are a number problems with the page that need addressing. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 13:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

99acres.com
This, on the other hand, was an excellent call - not only was A7 right on the money, but you could definitely have added your favourite G11 tag to this page too! Yunshui 雲‍水 12:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for all the support Mr Yunshui Shrikanthv (talk) 12:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲‍水 13:21, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

More on speedy deletions
Hi Shrikanthv. Following a couple of your recent CSD nominations, I thought I'd introduce you to a couple of useful rules of thumb regarding the use of CSD tags. Hope that helps make things a little clearer. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If an article has sources - any sources - think twice about applying A7. Usually, the presence of sources at least suggests the topic is notable, and a suggestion is all that's needed to negate A7. The same applies if the content suggests notability, but there are no sources at all.
 * Not every page that's about a company or product is advertising. G11 is only for unambiguous promotion: if the page seems to exist purely to say how great its subject is, that's unambiguous. If it seems to be there primarily to provide information, it's not a G11 candidate. The acid test is: does it look like it belongs on their CV/website? If so, you can probably G11 it.

SPI investigation
Hi Shrikanthv. Just for future reference, when you file a report at SPI you don't need to append "User:" in front of the suspects' usernames. The syntax used at SPI adds that automatically, so when you link to User:Jollypjoy the software will be looking for User:User:Jollypjoy, an account which doesn't exist. I've fixed the formatting for you, so the investigation is now at Sockpuppet investigations/Jollypjoy. I haven't commented on the investigation myself, but your evidence looks fairly sound. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:32, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you Mr Yunshui, nothing against the new user. but wanted to try out the WP:SPI procedure and how it works Shrikanthv (talk) 08:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm going to assume something got lost in the translation there; you aren't presumably saying that you started an SPI for no other reason than to see how the process worked? Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 08:50, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Nope, meant am learning the procedure for WP:SPI and definitly trying to remove sockpuppets Shrikanthv (talk) 08:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * That's what I thought, thanks for clarifying. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 08:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Contesting your A7
Hi Shrikanthv! Just to let you know I wrote a paragraph contesting your A7 on Talk:Akhil Bharat Nepali Ekta Samaj. I admire your motivation overall. By the way, there is a fun project called Check Wikipedia, have you tried it? It tells you what to fix where, a great way to be very useful to Wikipedia. I use it (and similar fixup tools) a lot myself too :-) Cheers! Nicolas1981 (talk) 08:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletions again
I have had to decline many of your speedy deletion tags today, with many of the articles involved being nowhere close to meeting the criteria. This is one example, where you tagged an article as not indicating importance or significance when it said that the subject was the mayor of a major city and a member of a state legislature. You will find many other examples in your contribution history.

Please refrain from tagging any more articles for speedy deletion until you have familiarised yourself with the criteria at WP:CSD. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:30, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello Mr phil, I went through the reference link, it never mentions he was mayor of Madras (chennai know) and is stating the name only ones and not even the full name ( only Sivasankar Mehta and not Ramanatha Sivasankar Mehta )the article is portraying. so was really skeptical on the self professed as mayor . did a CSD, yes i accept your suggestion , i will be more carefull from now on.Shrikanthv (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * No comment on the above article (I haven't looked at it yet), but after Phil's request above I do think you need a bit more help with CSDs. To that end, I've created this quiz to test your understanding. Complete it at your leisure, and let me know when you're finished; I'm also quite happy for you to ask me for clarification or help with any of the questions. Cheers, Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * One thing that you need to understand is that to get past WP:CSD an article only has to have a claim of importance or significance. It doesn't have to prove it with references. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:34, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * what to do if significance stated is false and found out through reading reference. (e.g shrikanth mayor of New york from 1956-59 article) Shrikanthv (talk) 07:03, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I say that still counts as a claim to notability (just because the reference provided doesn't support the statement doesn't mean that other sources which do support it don't exist somewhere), however most admins would accept that as deletable under G3 (blatant hoax). A PROD or AFD would also be acceptable (a good example of such an AFD is currently at Articles for deletion/Deziree Ramirez). Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 07:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Jan Satyagraha 2012
Hello,

You added a warning on this article, but you did not specify what are the issues on the talk page. Unless you do so shortly, I will remove the warning. Thanks, Yann (talk) 05:39, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

A friendly suggestion
Hi Shrikanthv. I'd like to offer you a suggestion, based on the recent issues you've been having with CSD and other deletion processes. Since you started editing a couple of months ago, the vast majority of your edits have been concerned with deletions - CSD, AFD and PRODs have accounted for most of your work here. There's nothing wrong with that - I actually spend most of my own time on Wikipedia deleting things that shouldn't be here - but you seem to have struggled with many of the nuances of the deletion policy, and it's brought you into conflict with other editors as a result.

Might I suggest that you change your focus, at least temporarily, to another aspect of Wikipedia? One of the reasons I'm comfortable around deletion work is because I've also spent a lot of time creating articles, which means that I've become very familiar with the various policies covering content. You might find it useful, not to mention rewarding, to try your hand at creating some pages from scratch; it's very satisfying and will hugely improve your accuracy in deletion tagging.

Ideas for content creation are everywhere (check out my essay on the subject for some pointers) - start by trying to create a basic stub, then maybe set yourself the goal of getting an article onto the main page via the Did you know? process. If you need help at any stage, from choosing a notable topic to promoting something to Featured article status, please ask me; I'll be more than happy to help. All the best, Yunshui 雲‍水 09:53, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks Mr Yunshui, (After small wiki break, iam back again ). I agree with you there seems to be lot of bad atmosphere to go in deleting articles , so i will start back my article creation way Shrikanthv (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Good to have you back. I'd suggest you get together an article in your sandbox - on whatever topic you fancy - and then drop me a note so that I can review it with you. Good luck, and enjoy - article creation can be quite a fun process! Yunshui  08:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui  09:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Ananda (Hindu Astrology)
Dear Shrikanthv, I was annoyed with you, certainly I was, but for the sake of the kind of work which we do here I chose to forget my annoyance. However, you are at liberty to wipeout all that I have posted, there will not be a single word of objection uttered by me. You very well know I don't own the space occupied by the article created by you. 59.97.64.187 (talk) 13:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)P.S.Soni Ruchi (talk) 13:36, 2 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, my suggestion to MS soni is not to ever to have attachment to the content you are producing (this i feel is against the learning process), i never wipedout your contents and had moved to talk page for discusssion. please participate in discussion , do not try to with hold yourself from objecting to things which you think is wrong or else there would not be a good article in wiki!! Shrikanthv (talk) 07:22, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  08:39, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Black people
Greetings Shrikanthv; there is a user on the black people article who has sought to include some of the material that was deemed offtopic in the recent rfc discussion. Specifically, text and an image on Australian Aborigines as "black people". I've tried explaining to and quoting for him what the community's decision was but to little effect. If it's not any trouble, could you perhaps clarify for him what exactly was the general consensus? It should only take a minute or two. Kind regards- Soupforone (talk) 23:35, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Soupforone (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Voltage controller
Hello! Your submission of Voltage controller at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yazan (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Declined speed deletion, and final warning
I have just declined your speedy deletion request on Arunava Sen. Winning a major prize like the Infosys Prize is clearly a claim of importance. I'm not certain it's enough to pass our notability guidelines for biographical articles, but it's clearly more than enough to pass A7. A lot of editors above have told you that you're simply not understanding speedy deletions. At this point, I'm explicitly telling you that you may no longer tag articles for speedy deletion--if you do, I will block you. Your errors not only cause extra work for administrators, but can easily drive away a new contributor who feels de-valued because their work was nominated for speedy deletion. This is disruptive and damaging to the encyclopedia as a whole. Perhaps if you can seek some formal mentorship from some of the people above (if they'll have you), and they're willing to guide you through the process for quite a while, you could maybe return to this in the future. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, while you're at it, be careful with other deletion techniques as well. You tagged Baputty Haji (it used to be spelled differently) with a WP:BLPPROD, but the infobox and article text clearly state he died 9 years ago; as such, you can't use BLPPROD. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:25, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkbalk
Soupforone (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Minimolude Achan
Hello Shrikanthv. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Minimolude Achan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: article is about a film, not a person, so A7 does not apply. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 10:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Neechabhanga Raja yoga
I have today recast and expanded the article Neechabhanga Raja yoga, I intend to expand it later further along with Viparita Raja yoga. Now, you can remove from this article the tag that you had appended a few days ago. You have dressed me up with a Barnstar without myself having made any contribution, kindly remove it. Thanks.Tarun marwaha (talk) 09:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

please have a look here and comment here as a discussion Shrikanthv (talk) 12:50, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Viparita Raja yoga
Thanks for your effort on Neechabhanga Raja yoga. I have today recast and expanded the article - Viparita Raja yoga. Kindly attend to it as well.Tarun marwaha (talk) 09:54, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  08:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Userright granted! Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  08:25, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

GA review!
I have reverted your Swami Vivekananda GA nomination! Did you make any edit there or are you aware of current status? --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright then, so you came from INT, I have wrote a detailed reply there! Nothing to apologize! You tried to help! (I did not see your INT post) If you see GA Review 1, there was only one issue- close paraphrasing in some paragraphs, which is still unsolved. So, you can guess the consequences if we go forward without solving the previous (only) issue. And there were (are) some CN tags which I have been fixing and some works on references are to be done! --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:50, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * About this edit, we are using Harvnb style citation, so please use that format! --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:03, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Where is page number and URL? location also incorrect, that has been already sourced in body so, ref in lead not necessary! Please self revert! --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Swami Vivekananda at the Parliament of the World's Religions (1893)
The article is just started, you can help here! You can use cite book template. How are you preparing Google Books citation? Manually? --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:10, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

FAR
I undid your request for GA Reassessment because we can go for FAR straight away. GAR will take time and even to stand a outside chance of making it to Jan 12th we have to nominate the article for FA now. I am waiting for Dwaipayan's comments on the article. Correct Knowledge «৳alk»  13:34, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You nominated it again? See . What are you tying to do? Don't to take quick decisions. If you are not a primary contributor of an article (which you are obviously not), discuss with primary contributor first and propose in Talk page. --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:39, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I think we can't keep going back and forth between various talk pages, it's leading to a communication gap. Let's take all our FA talk to Tito's talk page. Correct Knowledge  «৳alk»  13:46, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Peer review is not an issue. Let's conduct all our future discussions in User talk:Titodutta. Correct Knowledge  «৳alk»  13:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Question
Greetings Shrikanthv! The rfc on the black people page has almost reached an end. However, there's one last matter that I was hoping you could perhaps help clarify. Australian Aborigines and many South Asians apparently "share many cultural, linguistic, physical and genetic features". Given this, do you think it's consistent to exclude one and not the other? Please advise. kind regards -- Soupforone (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice! (For undiscussed approaches)
This is a clear notice. Stop random jumping what you have been doing. Your GA nomination of Swami Vivekananda was reverted twice in last 2 days which could be a good lesson to you. But, you failed to learn anything from it and have nominated it for FA today. You have done nothing in that article and cared to say no one that you were going to nominate. At least I'll not withdraw the nomination and going to co-operate there (I'll see what others say) just because I want to see the article on the main page on 12 January. Reply in this talk page. --Tito Dutta (talk) 15:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Shrikanth, your edits to incorporate Yunshui's suggestions into the article are praiseworthy, but you should have dropped Tito a message at User talk:Titodutta before nominating the article. I don't think we need to undo the nomination this time. It's about time we went for the FAR anyway. Dwaipayan and others can make their final edits in the next 12 hours or so, after which the article should be ready. Just don't drop a note at WT:IN or advertise the FAR in any other way as yet. Correct Knowledge  «৳alk»  15:37, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Voltage controller
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Again..
Uff, who told you to go ahead and translude the page? Right after the transclusion it was found that lyrics characters are not counted, the transclusion was kept in incubator for 1-2 days! Why did you transcluded it without expanding the article? --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:56, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I have reverted one edit and corrected one ref. You are adding Google Book refs incorrectly. Don't add thatq=Your+Query portion! And add ref names so that those can be used again! --09:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

STOP
..and try to learn how WIkipedia works! --Tito Dutta (talk) 10:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India (2nd nomination)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India (2nd nomination), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India (2nd nomination) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Tito Dutta (talk) 23:28, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Deletion criteria!
Please read the deletion criteria before nominating articles for deletion. As in here, there was already a reference in that article. If you have questions you can ask at help desk or my talk page! --Tito Dutta (talk) 18:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Sri Aurobindo GA
Hi Shrikanthv, I see you've edited Sri Aurobindo. I've checked the article, and it needs some work before it can proceed to GA. I've put it on hold to allow time for this. Would you be able to co-ordinate this work? I can try other editors but since you probably know them already, it might be best if you did it. Please let me know what you decide. All the best Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I see you're at work on the article. I invited some other editors with no immediate result, but it is a holiday period.

On references, two things. a) if you are using the same one several times (like the Sketch from the ashram), then you should use the first time, and (by itself) all subsequent times, so only one ref appears at the end of the article, with multiple usages listed. This avoids misleading readers and keeps the article tidy; makes it easy to reuse common sources, too. b) it's a bit flaky using Ashram sources as these are not independent; it may be all right to establish details of fact, but if other sources are available that would be better. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Ah, and you have three different references all with the title "The Mother" - I think you should distinguish these in some way, if indeed better sources for all of them can't be found. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletions
Hi Shrikanthv. I've had a complaint from Tito Dutta on my talkpage regarding your recent deletion nominations, and I have to say, I agree with his concerns. Your use of the template is simply incorrect - any independent, reliable source negates the use of this template, even if it doesn't satisy the requirements for notability or substantial coverage - and your multiple AFD nominations with the blanket reason "Does not meet wiki notablity criteria" are bordering on disruptive, even if they do result in deletion of the articles concerned.

You've consistently run into problems with Wikipedia's deletion policy - I seem to recall that the very first issues I had to address with you all stemmed from incorrect CSD tagging - and it's reached a point now where I'm concerned that you're going to get yourself into trouble with it. As a result, I'm asking you to voluntarily refrain from nominating any page for deletion, via any method (CSD, PROD, BLPPROD or AFD), for a minimum of three months - during that time, we'll work on your understanding of the deletion policy and how it applies. You're welcome (encouraged, in fact) to comment on existing AFDs, since this will help show your understanding of the relevent policies, but please don't start any yourself. There is plenty more to do on Wikipedia (I see that you're getting the hang of article editing and using references, which is excellent), and once I'm convinced that you have a thorough understanding of the deletion policy I'd be happy for you to get involved in that field again. For now, though, please hold off on making any more nominations. If you come across a page that you feel strongly should be deleted, please ask me first (or another experienced editor if I'm not available) before doing anything with it.

Feel free to drop me a line on my talkpage if you have any questions. Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  09:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Gross misunderstanding of BLP PROD bordering upon vandalism
I have chosen to treat your nomination of Jonathan Goodwin (entrepreneur) as a BLPPROD as a simple error. I could easily have interpreted it as vandalism. Please take this is a vandalism warning, but level zero. I have removed your notice. It was placed on an ill formatted and poor article, but on one where references exist. MIsuse of templates in this manner does, after it has been brought to your attention, constitute vandalism. Although outside the formal warning process, please take this as a serious warning over your editing behaviour. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, yes i think it was an error, please have look at the above talks , currently i will not be involved in deletion tags for next three months. and will only start after guidence from my mentor Shrikanthv (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * A wise and public spirited move, thank you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your AfD nominations
Shrikanthji, is it not time that you removed your Afd nominations on A Guide to Human Conduct and Yogic Treatments and Natural Remedies? --Abhidevananda (talk) 01:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * And some time for revisiting those two Vivekananda books nominations too? --Tito Dutta (talk) 12:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Shrikanthv after your proposal for deletion I've expanded Yogic Treatments and Natural Remedies's article inserting new academic/scientific sources to highlight the clear article's encyclopedic value. I think you can now remove the AFD nomination. Thanks--Cornelius383 (talk) 02:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Shrikanthv, It seems to me that there are other AfD nominations which require you to withdraw them. Please do not delay. This mess requires your work to clear it up. Be assiduous in performing that task, please. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 12:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I've closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India as Keep, but Articles for deletion/Life And Philosophy Of Swami Vivekananda remains open - there are no policy-based arguments for keeping it, so I will only close it if you withdraw the nomination. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * On closer examination, I've actually undone my own closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Vivekananda: Messiah of Resurgent India - there are no sufficient arguments for keeping it at present. Again, if you withdraw the nomination, I'm happy to close it. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  12:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Cheers for the withdrawal notices, both AFDs now closed. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:07, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Some good words!
Some wise people told– Only he has a right to criticize who has a hand to help So, your AFDs were not too bad in comparison to your BLPPRODs and that should not create any problem for you if I forget few minor issues: That shows, not a single issue above is a very big issue at this moment. That's all! I often wonder why I write such long posts...--Tito Dutta (talk) 13:26, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, you can read Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions which is a very handy guide! --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:45, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion revisited
Hi Shrikanthv. Sorry it's taken me a few days to get back to you with this. I've created a couple of new adoption pages that will hopefully further your understanding of the deletion process; take a look when you have the opportunity: User:Yunshui/Adoption/Shrikanthv/PROD and User:Yunshui/Adoption/Shrikanthv/AFD.

By the way, I second Chiswick Chap above; good work on the Sri Aurobindo article! Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  10:34, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Adoption
Hi Shrikanthv. I don't know whether you've retired from Wikipedia entirely or if you're still knocking around as a reader - either way, you haven't edited anything for the last three months, and so I think it's probably sensible to bring our adoption arrangement to an end. If you like to stay on as an adoptee, please drop me a note and I'll happily reinitiate the process. All the best, in life, Wikipedia and everything. Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  13:14, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Chandan Dasgupta
Hello Shrikanth, I propose to remove the "delete" tag from this article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Chandan_Dasgupta#Chandan_Dasgupta It may require clean-up, but certainly not deletion.

Pranabnlp (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

BLPPROD
Welcome back. I notice that you've been placing a lot of BLPPPROD tags recently, and I'm afraid you have been doing so incorrectly. Please read the BLPPROD policy, which clearly states that if an article contains any sources (regardless of whether they meet the reliable sources guideline or not) it cannot be tagged for deletion via this method. You struggled with deletion issues last year and clearly still have a lot to learn about correct deletion tagging; I would strongly suggest that you avoid doing any work in deletion tagging for the time being. Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  08:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲 ‍ 水  08:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sri Aurobindo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sri Aurobindo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- 19:50, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Congress in Haryana
Just a note, if an editor removes a proposed deletion tag, even if the removal is not accompanied by a reason for removal, the deletion is considered contested and that article is ineligible for proposed deletion from that point forward. The only exception would be where removal of a tag was done as a clear act of vandalism or blanking the page, or if the editor removing the tag was violating a ban in the process. If you or another editor wish to see this article deleted, please consider bringing it to articles for deletion, thank you. --  At am a  頭 22:12, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=601332024 your edit] to Sri Aurobindo may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * a supernature, and the emergence of a gnostic supramental being and a divine life on earth. {cite book  | last =Aurobindo  | first = Sri | authorlink = Sri Aurobindo | title = The life divine

Your GA nomination of Sri Aurobindo
The article Sri Aurobindo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sri Aurobindo for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- 09:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Aam Aadmi Party
You have reverted four of my small edits with existing citation saying "Please state the sources and discuss in talk page before addition. (TW)". I have reinstated my edits, can you please review my changes and confirm that they are not-sourced and violating Wikipedia guidelines? I believe that I need not create a discussion in Talk Page for these one-word or one-sentence edits sourced from the existing citation.

Saved Edit summary text: The citation mentions Karnataka only.

I changed "certain states" to "Karnataka".

Saved Edit summary text: Without the date the sentence seems to imply that it was a direct consequence of Hazare request that he stopped the fast. On the other hand Kejriwal himself has not said it was the deciding factor. He continued to fast for another 7 days. The citation is present, I added the date " on March 29 ".

Appended "Rs 220 crore" to "driven by subsidy". Citation is present.

Saved Edit summary text: Changed to maintain neutral point of view. The earlier statement sent a message that Jung was being dictatorial whereas he was only saying that it has to follow Transaction of Business Rules (TBR), 2002. The Law Ministry backed. The citation is present.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aam_Aadmi_Party&diff=0&oldid=602231831

Jyoti (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Take it to the article talk page. The pair of you discussing it here means nothing. - Sitush (talk) 16:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * But Sitush this is just my question to this particular editor, I do not want to discuss with other editors or on the article talk page. My argument is merely that the reason given by this editor to revert my edits are not correct in my opinion and he should justify it -- the onus of proving his statement is his. I noticed you have also bulk reverted all four of my edits. And your comment is "Too much detial, unnecessary acronyms and ignorance of WP:MOSDATE". It clearly does not have too much detail. Unnecessary acronym is for "Rs", if you could tell me how to correct that I can do it from the next time. I will read up WP:MOSDATE. I am not taking this to the article talk page. I will not make these edits again without a consensus. It is pretty discouraging to have even one word edits reverted and having to take it to Article Talk page instead of having a conversation with the editor. Jyoti (talk) 16:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Bangalore, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.  Neil N  talk to me  14:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

01 April 2014
why did you remove articleForward Press (Magazine).It is not good of you.I'm correspondence of Forward Press from Aligarh.It is very popular magazine.Its published more than 10,000 copies per month.It is bilingual (Hindi & English languages).Famous writer Gail Omvedt writes also for Forward Press.click this- https://twitter.com/PrabhuGuptara/status/166817411981508610 http://www.andrews.edu/sed/leadership_dept/adjunct_faculty_info/wolf_thom.html Jschauhan2013 (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

4 April 2014 Modi
What did i remove from the Narendra Modi page? Tri400 (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

About Talk:Arvind Kejriwal
Hi, I have merged your original entry sub-headed NEWS to another main section headed Merged entry on a specific news incident. However, no alterations have been made to the original post and replies. Talk:Arvind_Kejriwal

About Katikala Siva Bhagya Rao
You have deleted the page Katikala Siva Bhagya Rao. The man runs an NGO offering free services to over 22000 backward caste people in Andhra Pradesh, India. The work this man does may not reach the elite media because all his work is in the villages at the grass root level. The man needs commendation and a wiki page is the least one can do for him. I also have given newspaper articles about his service work. The language could have been more simplistic, agreed. But certainly isn't 'instant delete' worthy. Whilst, movie stars with mere 1,2 movies have wiki articles, why should a government servant who spend the last three decades in helping people through his NGO not deserve a wiki page? Can you please help me put up this page again. -- Hunking Hunk

Deletion
Okay, this needs to stop. Whilst occasionally you make a good call on articles which need to be deleted, the signal-to-noise ratio is so low that it verges on the disruptive. This isn't a new development, either; since you started here, you have demonstrated consistently poor judgement in the application of CSD, PROD, BLPPROD and AFD tags, and the last month or so has shown that there has been little improvement in this area. I'm therefore, regretfully, laying down a final warning: if you make another inappropriate deletion request, via any deletion mechanism, I or another administrator may block your account without warning. This has gone on for far too long - turn your attention to other areas of Wikipedia (I know you were looking at GA recently) and leave the whole sphere of deletion alone. I'm sorry it's come to this, but enough is enough. Yunshui 雲 水 08:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I take your Advice Yunshui, will give up deletion handling until you ask me back into it, & let me create something good from now on .. (do I have to take back my current AFD's ? , do let me know ) , yes finally got a GA for article but had to rework again with senior editor to keep it that way Shrikanthv (talk) 08:23, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * There's no need to withdraw the AFDs you've already done unless the !voting is entirely against you (if anyone else has !voted for deletion, the discussion should be allowed to run for the full week). Let me know if you need any help with article creation. If you do happen across something that's incontrovertibly deletable (don't go looking for it!), please feel free to ask me for a second opinion - I'd rather not block you if I don't have to! Yunshui 雲 水 08:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Narendra Modi Poll projection
Dear Mr Shrikanth. THe discussion talk page on polls projections regarding Narendra Modi is waiting for you. Please do not show so much desperation to delete what all opinion polls are projecting. Have an open mind and face the reality of poll projection outcome.210.212.144.133 (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

GA reassessment
Sri Aurobindo, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. - Sitush (talk) 19:05, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Aurobindo
Hi, regarding the GA delisting of Sri Aurobindo, you say that there was no consensus for it. WP:CONSENSUSis not a vote but rather a decision based on assessment of arguments that in turn are based on policy compliance. Even you have said that the article has many faults, and others (including me) have said the same. It is not GA standard & I think it will take quite a bit of work to make it so. - Sitush (talk) 23:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I happened to click on the article and was surprised to see his birth name three times in the infobox, but the article name not once. Is there a reason I might understand? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)


 * hi, I really did not notice that, corrected it. there was disscussion previously on this, he started to use Sri in front of his name without ghose on later stage of his life, so had to correct this. thanks for noticing Shrikanthv (talk) 06:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Revert in Cytus
Hi. In adding to the playable song list, I have effectively manually reverted your revert in Cytus. This uses citing to the version 6.1.0 of the game, hopefully addressing your "unreferenced addition of data".  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 06:23, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Mir Mandow Rind
Mir Mandow Rind is nominated for deletion. Discussion is possible here: Articles for deletion/Mir Mandow Rind. The Banner talk 17:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Hooray!

 * Congratulations from your GA reviewer. I am pleased to see the article so much improved. I am sure you will have noticed that there is still room for improvement beyond the GA criteria; I have listed some of these areas at the end of the GA review. Be aware that many editors believe that GA status requires perfect formatting of citations: the fact that the criteria quite plainly state that this is not a requirement is easily overlooked. Editors are of course quite right to push for references to be tidy and well-organised, and it will probably save you trouble if you take time to tidy these up further. After that, I am sure that further development of the Influence and Reception sections will prove interesting and productive, and will certainly make the article stronger. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course, no article is perfect. Congratulations Shrikanthv! Bladesmulti (talk) 10:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality of sources
A copyvio has been detected and removed from the Sri Aurobindo article, and another source needs to be verified. It will be necessary to address any concerns people may have about the reliability of the sources used, or the article may be delisted. There is discussion on the talk page. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Please could you address the Heehs citation as the most urgent issue. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Bharatiya Janata Party.png
Hi

I replied to your discussion here:. Thanks for reporting the file, but WP:AFD was the wrong process. I tagged it as orphaned fair use. If you think it is copyvio/incorrect source you should tag for that additionally, using WP:CSD:F3, F7 or F9, and given the history of the uploader I have to say that seems likely to be the case. If you need help, let me know, but I only come here once a week or so now, so might not reply immediately. Cheers. Begoon &thinsp; talk 18:17, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

List of United States presidential elections in Pennsylvania
Hi! Just noticed you patrolled and tagged this article. Would you care to clarify some of the issues you see with the article? Thanks, Tyrol5   [Talk]  19:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dahlander pole changing motor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cranes and Fans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Sauer article
Hi. The football player Maximilian Sauer meets the notability criteria for football players, and it's sourced by reliable third-party sources. So, what issues do you see with the article? Alexpostfacto (talk) 10:26, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Albert Samuel Twort
My brother, who created the article, asked me what to do about it. I've no issue with you placing the csd tag on the article, but have userfied it to allow him to work it up. It may be that notability cannot be asserted, but let's give him a chance. Best, Mjroots (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
 * surething no probs Shrikanthv (talk) 07:08, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Dahlander pole changing motor
Hello! Your submission of Dahlander pole changing motor at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 17:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 17:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Zināt. Raudāt. Dziedāt.
Hi. I have declined your speedy deletion nomination - WP:CSD only applies if the artist has no article, but Raman Jaraš has one. JohnCD (talk) 15:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * oops! did not notice that Shrikanthv (talk) 07:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

BNA access
Chris Troutman ( talk ) 00:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Canvassing
Hello Shrikanthv, It appears that you have been canvassing users to participate in your AfD for saffron terror. You should note that there are guidelines for WP:Canvassing, which you are expected to follow. If you do not follow them, all the votes that you have canvassed will be in danger of being discounted. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 11:58, 12 December 2014 (UTC)


 * read the policy you are heavily mistaken. But if you are convinced report to WP:ANI, beware of WP:BOOMERANG though. Cheers! --<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra T 12:15, 12 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Kautilya, note my comments it is not biased and does not carry any remote influence nor indirect suggestive measure of what has to be done, if this was the criteria and I even posted in Indian community for involvement and does not carry an ounce of suggestion on what has to be done. Shrikanthv (talk) 12:17, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The guidelines are quite strict: "The audience must not be selected on the basis of their opinions—for example, if notices are sent to editors who previously supported deleting an article, then identical notices should be sent to those who supported keeping it. Do not send notices to too many users, and do not send messages to users who have asked not to receive them." I thought I should let you know. That is all.  Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 13:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Tagging
Earlier this month you tagged Uygar Aktan with 9 problems, about half of which were relevant. If all of them were relevant, then it would still not be useful because the relevant tags could be overlooked. For more information, see WP:TAGBOMB. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 02:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)


 *  Amaryllis Gardener  thanks, Did not know about WP:TAGBOMB, intention was only to be comprehenisive Shrikanthv (talk) 06:33, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Tagging 2
Why did you revert my edit? All the tags removed applied to the page. Explain how they don't. Speedy Climber (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * again can you see the message above, refer to . wp:tagbomb , Also check I was the one who added all tags before Shrikanthv (talk) 06:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Again, why did you remove them? The issues are still present, and yet you removed the tags. Speedy Climber (talk) 08:52, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * again please read by clicking on the link here wp:tagbomb, and I have not reverted you Shrikanthv (talk) 09:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes you did and I reverted it back. I am not tag bombing because each and every tag is valid. Tag bombing is only valid when the tags are not valid. Show how the tags you removed are not valid. One by one. Speedy Climber (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ( Comment from uninvolved editor ) Can I just say that yes, WP:TAGBOMB mostly applies to adding a load of irrelevant tags to a page, but it's not recommended that you add a load of tags to a page even if they all are relevant, as you would want the biggest problems with the page to get the most attention. I'm going to watch Patu Keswani and maybe sometime I can improve it, so then most of the tags can be removed. Regards, -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 14:18, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe it's not recommended, but that's doesn't mean it's not allowed. Anyway, I see that you took care of two of the tags correctly - which is what I wanted to see. Speedy Climber (talk) 00:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Dahlander pole changing motor
 Harrias  <sup style="color:#009900;">talk 12:01, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 24 December
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Intuition (Mind) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=639477422 your edit] caused an ISBN error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F639477422%7CIntuition (Mind)%5D%5D Ask for help])

hii why the edit made on [arvind kejriwal] is not constructive ? aren't accusations with references are not included in any wiki article ? [arvind kejriwal] has been accused of stealing some one else works and why not bring this accusation or controversy into light ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krazylearner (talk • contribs) 15:33, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

regarding plagiarism accusations on arvind kejriwal
hii why the edit made on [arvind kejriwal] is not constructive ? aren't accusations with references are not included in any wiki article ? [arvind kejriwal] has been accused of stealing some one else works and why not bring this accusation or controversy into light ?

Elsevier access
Chris Troutman ( talk ) 21:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

BOCD
This is virtually unsourced because the given information is not backed by source.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 10:37, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I think so too, but I also see that there is some kind of campaign to change history, guess if we wait it out for year it would be new way of looking at history Shrikanthv (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

About Page Deletion
Hi This is Tanishq. I would like to tell you that there are various (reliable) sources such as Times Of India's report on Reet Sharma (Times Of India is India's largest newspaper and the reporting rooted name), and her entrance in the new show. There are also articles published on news channel website, for example telechakkar.com about Reet Sharma and her projects. I have reliably entered the variable sources on her Wikipedia page. Kindly remove the tag as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanishqsh (talk • contribs) 13:23, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

About Page Deletion Continued
Hi Shrikanth, I thank you for the welcome. I did have a look for tellychakkar's operations and it is a newschannel based only for bollywood and not a fan-site. I am in no way related to Reet Sharma. Second, she has been mentioned in the vocal-visual news of Times Of India. Hence, kindly remove the tags and the notification of deletion. --Tanishqsh (talk) 13:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

speedy deletion
I;ve had to decline two of your speedy deletions. The criterion for deleting via A7 is no indication of any plausible significance or importance. This is a much looser requirement than for actual notability. A substantial public career is an indication of significance, even if it does not met WP:N. The way to deal with articles like these where you doubt the notability is to use either Prod or AFD (or BLP Prod if a living person and unsourced)  DGG ( talk ) 17:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Roby Datta
Hello, I am new here. Could you help me with the Roby Datta page? Feel free to e-mail me at adutt77@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adutt77 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hinduism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Passion. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Warnings for rticle Sagar Mohanty
Hi Shrikanthv,

I thank you for taking the time to review and suggest improvements to the Sagar Mohanty article from a third party point of view. I appreciate this because as a new comer to this medium, it helps me learn quickly and better understand the environment. I noticed that two of the warnings were similar and address the same issue of neutrality. It also appears to me after some analysis that I really need to improve this article based on your remarks. Therefore, I will work through these issues one by one. Please also note that as I move along, I will also delete the related warnings. If you have some specific advice to improve this article, I will be pleased to hear them. As the founder of Wikipedia Jimmy Wales once said: "Do not bite the newbies". Thank you Djamourou (talk) 14:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ajativada, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   09:03, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for warning ! please refer to topic page for discussion, It was not removed without any reason Shrikanthv (talk) 09:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I've responded there. Thanks for the thanks; I appreciate irony. NB: don't forget: no Buddhism without India. No meditation without India, I guess. As I wrote elsewhere: when your forefathers were building palaces, my forefathers were building wooden cabins in the swamps. Buddhism is also part of your heritage, and we're thankfull for your heritage. And by the way: Ramana Maharshi saved my soul. Your culture provides knowledge and insight on the non-existence of the "I" which the western culture is painfully lacking.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   09:18, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, I have nothing against Buddhism, I too follow some of its practices and am also blessed to know about Ramana maharshi, note the problem what i found is not on expanding of the subject or the information, but on crystalising of the information, if your are really a "seeker" as a personnal note would advice to watch this Shrikanthv (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Deep! Or is it me imagining things? SMirC-mmm.svg (No thoughts on the content discussion). --<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra T 10:19, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Nainam chindathi sastrani, nainam dahathi pavakah. The soul doesn't need to be "saved". It just needs to be realized. Tathvamasi, Joshua Jonathan, I really believe that. None of us can match you! Kautilya3 (talk) 14:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

in use
When updating an article, you can use the template. Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   11:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 11 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Mandukya Upanishad page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=650931457 your edit] caused an authorlink error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F650931457%7CMandukya Upanishad%5D%5D Ask for help])

Buddhism
Hi Shrikanthv. I don't know if you read my response at my talkpage; I'll copy ithere, and add some more.


 * "Thanks for your comment on the Buddhist influence on the Mandukya Karika. You're a fair man. The point of departure between Buddhism and Vedanta may be the "motionlessness" of the Absolute. You know this comparison with a moving wheel, and the center which is motionless (I guess you do, since you grew up in Indian culture, and I'm only a reader)? The Absolute, Brahman, Nirvana, is the center. Vedanta sees it as absolutely motionless, while Buddhism emphasises the constructed nature of everything - no absolutes. Or at least, that's what modern Buddhism says. Please read Pre-sectarian Buddhism, and then tell me how different Buddhism is from Vedanta, or how different it has been made to be from Vedanta."

Also recommended, as a follow-up: Buddha-nature, especially Buddha-nature. Following some of Blades' diffs on Thigle, I also read a comment by Thigle that Mahayana was the "original Buddhism", and Abhidharmic Buddhism was a later development. I don't know if that's correct, but after reading those two sections mentioned above, you tell me: if this was "the original Buddhism", how different is it from Vedanta? I'd say: not. It was highly surprising for me to realize this, and I still don't know if it is correct; but it's amazing. And take note: I'm not writing here that Vedanta is not different from (Mahayana) Buddhism, I'm writing that this "oldest Buddhism", if the info is correct, is hardly different from Vedanta. Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   07:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

You may also be interested in this site Zennist. This guy is also arguing that the oldest Buddhism did adhere to some sort of atman, and that Buddhism can't be understood without such an idea. Quote:
 * "To get down to business, citta is the past participle of √CIT which means "the animating principle of life" (V.S. Apte, The Student's Sanskrit-English Dictionary, p. 208). Western Buddhist scholars are still not here.  Citta is too mystical, perhaps.  They are still regarding citta as ‘thought’ in the example of bodhi-citta, meaning the “thought of enlightenment.”  But in truth, bodhicitta means the animating principle of life that has awakened to itself.  Formerly, it was a sleep; under the spell of its phenomena.  As Buddha, it has self-awakened.  There is nothing higher than this awakening to the very substance of life.  When we think of such Buddhist terms as unborn Mind, pure Mind, one Mind, unconditioned Mind, etc., such terms are describing the animating principle of life which has awakened to itself."

Now, Atman/Brahman originally also meant something like the animating principle, didn't it? "Brahm", to grow, to expand. The contemporary English translation of "satcitananda" as "being-consciousness-bliss" may be too simple, losing very important nuances; "consciousness" may be too simple a translation, as if "it" is just a "thing", an object. Food for thought here... Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   09:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * JJ, nice that i come to know, that you are not just staying at the crust, (you have to note that all the above discussion and my talking below are still mind trying to throw its Javelin as far as possible, and we are not talking at the cross section where Buddha achieved Buddha hood),

now on our topic: there is tendencies in Indian Buddhists and Vedantists for ascetism and this has twisted, turned the truths according to its requirement. the same spirit of ascetism (either Buddhistic & Vedantic) considers only one part of the equation "the one without a second" (vedantins ) or as you mentioned "absolutes" (buddhism) but the other part "all is Brahman" as been termed as illusion (maya, Karma) or adopted to the meaning of the first one.(not nullyfying vedantins totally but expanding on the missing part),

Note as you mention above wheel with Nirvana, the absolute or " absolutes" as you term it in the centre, giving a simili let us say you have never seen a ocean, suddenly you see a ocean and at first sight see waves comming at great heights out of it and now declare "ha the ocean is a turbulant entity" now you go near it and go inside it (below into ocean depths) and meet a person who is in perfect peace and declares "ocean is actually at perfect peace, the waves are illusion a mere construction"(vedantins) and the other guy says "their is neither" (buddhist)

"all is Brahman ?"

yes we can go to the depths and be with consciousness of the one "unborn" "pure mind" "awakened to itself" or towards "absolutes"and surely there is nothing beyond it, but terming it or the construction which has come out of it, as an illusion is half part of the story.

(continuing your last sentences) there were two parts before veda"anta" from veda "the path of knowledge" = "Vedanta" and "path of ananda" = "Tantra" or vama marga (not to be confused with tantric traditions of buddhism nor with other derated practises ..), in Tantra focus shifts to prakriti or the pouring of atman into energy, there is action, creation, the ananda of becoming ..... you were right in qouting the difference between vedanta & Buddhisim but as you see above there is much comming Shrikanthv (talk) 12:37, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Nice what you say on tantra, action. You know, I've got a small statue of Shiva since I was a student. it's always standing near the side of my bed. It touches me, for the movement which is in there, dancing, the Absolute ever-changing - maybe like 'not graspable in words, and yet, we 'get it''. Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   14:51, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * One more comment: what would Buddhism have been without Ashoka? A relic from the past?  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   05:36, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Your Nomination for speedy deletion
Hello. The original photo was found on the website of the University. It was licensed under CC By 4.0. This was the source. I do not understand, why was it deleted from Vijender Kumar! Educationtemple (talk) 14:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Meditation
Shrikanthv, do you practice meditation? Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   06:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * JJ, apart from regular stuff, I was doing some Gurdjieff excercises and movements, but Currently I have been instructed to abstain from doing anything Shrikanthv (talk) 08:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Billy Lynch (Australian footballer)
Hi Shrikanthv,

I saw your note letting me know you unreviewed the page I created - I was just wondering why you did this? I'm a bit out of the loop on that sort of stuff! Cheers

Terlob (talk) 12:26, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Hillhouse Capital
Hi. I noticed you tagged an article that I edited which says that this article has "multiple issues." I am a little new to wikipedia, and I hope you can point out to me what changes I need to make in order to meet the standards of wikipedia to avoid the "close connection" tag, the "original research" tag, and the "notability" tag. Perhaps these tags don't have anything to do with my edits, but the edits that came before me? since the article was up since January, and I only made my first edits in March, can it be that the problems are from previous edits that came before mine? If that is the case, I am ready to change those edits too, in order to improve the article to meet wikipedia quality standards. I really appreciate your help. the article in question is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillhouse_Capital_Group. thanks again.Jiminycricket55 (talk) 06:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Chelsea Clintom
"Objectionable text with a poor source" is a compleat explanation of why I removed that text. I suggest that you stop using automated tools like Twinkle and begin to apply your mind, assuming you have one, before interfering with constructive editors. I also suggest you read WP:CIR and WP:AGF. Needless to say I am reverting your mindless edit. ShoeMacneil (talk) 04:35, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Arvind Kejriwal
Your edit to this BLP article page was in direct contravention of Wikimedia Terms of Use. I have undone it. ShoeMacneil (talk) 04:41, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, can we continue this conversation in talk page? of the article Shrikanthv (talk) 04:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Your behavior is outrageous. Surely you know that BLP articles must be FACTUALLY CORRECT. I insist that you immediately correct your latest revert and stop EDIT WARRING. ShoeMacneil (talk) 05:00, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/kejriwal-never-worked-as-i-t-commissioner-irs-association/1/326176.html ShoeMacneil (talk) 05:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-02-01/news/58675974_1_arvind-kejriwal-aap-kerjiwal ShoeMacneil (talk) 05:07, 17 April 2015 (UTC)


 * calm down, reverting your changes does not mean a edit war. without discussion (possibly a claim by a association)  do not change an article without discussion which is much stable by now Shrikanthv (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * again please take this to relevant talk page Shrikanthv (talk) 05:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

You've got mail!
Nikkimaria (talk) 21:18, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Reverting to old contents
So if you gonna revert back to old contents independent of whether the added changes or contents has merit or not then what's the point of contributing ??? So I came back to contribute to Wikipedia but now I feel like why should I ?? Ksubburaj (talk) 16:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Nice that you wanted to talk, please note that for a single topic there could be numerous point of view, and just like yourself there would be many who would like to contribute, can it happen that there could be difference on what is right! ?, so usually we have talk page where we can discuss this and sort it out. please note politics related article are one of the worst case scenario for this. Shrikanthv (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Karnataka
Sir, as per the law of the land, no state in india can have state flag. It is only Jammu and Kashmir that is presently having a state flag as per Article 370. The Government doesn't allow or there is no such provision that allows state to have separate flag. its unconstitutional.

Karnataka has no official state flag, and the flag in the article is not an official one. Its a cultural "Kannada Flag" Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kannada_flag http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/ampnbspNo-state-flag-for-Karnatakaampnbsp/articleshow/11000220.cms?

Hope the sources are enough proof, and hence its not viable to put the kannada flag as the state flag in the Wiki Article. Qwerty3594 (talk) 14:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Visit Talk:Kargil War
Visit Talk:Kargil War Tejas MRCA (talk) 15:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC) Tejas MRCA (talk) 15:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

need help in editing
hi Shrikanthv, I am writing about various civil servants of India ..who are really helpful to the people ..right now I am writing on "sridhar babu addanki[]", please do help in editing to make the article elegant and in a proper manner ..the article has been deleted once due to poor references .I managed to get proper references now and I am writing in sandbox ..please do edit the article and help me to get it in to main stream swaroop 12:00, 3 July 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakthi swaroop (talk • contribs)


 * Hi check it once again I have given a little push in right direction, just before creating go through similar pages already existing similar pages in wiki and try to see the source that should give you a good idea Shrikanthv (talk) 12:41, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

WP:ANI
I have reverted your close and requested an admin close at ANI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#RFC_Close_for_Ayurveda

&mdash;Kww(talk) 14:22, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Mentoring
Thanks for your thrust; highly appreciated. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   20:18, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Archive
Hi Shrikanthv. Do you need some help with your archives? I noticed that a large mass of threads as archived, and remembered that you put them back at your talkpage some time ago. Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   05:09, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi JJ, Thanks, yes I need some help it seems messy , I do not know myself where to start from Shrikanthv (talk) 05:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay, I think I've fixed it. See the link in the Archive Box.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   11:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot! Shrikanthv (talk) 13:34, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Acharya Dev Vrat
Why did you want that page deleted? Other than an IP edit breaking the template (easily reverted), I don't see anything obviously wrong with it. —Kusma (t·c) 14:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, did not notice the actual content from the mess, thought was filled with only signs oops.. will be carefull from next time. curious Q Kusma is a Indian name but a is it also in Deutsch ? curiosa Shrikanthv (talk) 14:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, I did not know it was an Indian name. Interesting! I know it as a Russian name (Кузьма, the Russian form of Cosmas), which is usually written Kuzma in English or Kusma in German (I learned the name from a German translation of a Russian book). Happy editing, —Kusma (t·c) 15:59, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanations! In any case a blossoming girl's name is better than mumps :) —Kusma (t·c) 05:51, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

The case for the article on the Indian given name article titled "Vishwajeet"
The name Henry has an entire Wikipedia page, as it is a notable given name of English origin. Similarly there are hundreds of notable given names of Indian origin that have their own page (such as Rahul, Soumya, Abhishek, etc.).

Please refer to the following wikipedia pages for further evidence of popular Indian given names having their own Wikipedia pages: -


 * - Category: Indian masculine given names
 * - Category: Indian feminine given names
 * - Category: Indian given names
 * - Category: Hindu given names

The popularity of the name is established by means of adding a list of notable people with the given name, as is the case with most of the articles in the above mentioned categories. Therefore, the page on the Indian masculine name Vishwajeet deserves a Wikipedia page for the benefit of the users as a source for useful information on the history and meaning of the name. However, users are free to make appropriate edits as they seem fit, and wherever necessary. Either the deletion tag needs to be removed, or all the hundreds of pages on Indian given names need to be tagged for deletion with immediate effect, which would call for the deletion of every other article on given names irrespective of country of origin. Kreplach123 (talk) 17:27, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Please note that just being present does not bring notability and also mere asserting that it should be present nor pointing out to something else brings the article any notability, do not panic it is deletion discussion not a speedy delete tag, so lets see the out come and please bring your points to relevant talk page Shrikanthv (talk) 06:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

BLP Prod
Hello, Shrikanthv. :)

While investigating copyright concerns raised with P Muniraju Gowda, I noticed that you had nominated it for BLP Prod. I have had to remove that nomination, as unfortunately the article does not qualify. Proposed deletion of biographies of living people notes that a BLP Prod can be proposed only if an article does not have any sources at all - whether reliable or unreliable. At the time you placed the PROD, the article included reference to, which makes it ineligible for that process. Before nominating articles for this process, please make sure that they contain no sources in any form. Meanwhile, it may be appropriate to pursue deletion of this article under another process. I have not yet completed my copyright check, but it is definitely in need of much work! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:18, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks!, will look into it Shrikanthv (talk) 13:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Discussion to reapply modifications on RackBank page
Hi Shrikanthv!

I would sincerely like to request you to redo my recent contributions to RackBank. I made those modifications to the page as there were several issues that were raised because the content of the page seemed quite like an advertisement. My aim was to provide relevant information about the company so that people would easily get to know about it. Therefore, I'd you to redo the exact modifications and in case, you feel that some other modifications can be made, kindly let me know.


 * would ask you to go through the links I have pasted in your talk page before we discuss anything further Shrikanthv (talk) 08:46, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Deleting Mandya Sri Shirdi Satya Sai Baba
This place has attained significant importance over the last few years since its establishment. It is NOT about a company or corporation or organisation. In India all temples which are of public importance are either run by an individual or a trust as a custodian of the public faith and commitment. it is more of charity to run the temple. The details of the place, provided in this article has been provided and detailed as there have been many miracles which have taken place for devotees over the least three upon visit to the temple. In the recent times, there have been thousands of piligrims thronging to the temple. It is building to be a place of significant importance for the Sai Baba devotees in the southern region of India and therefore, believe the article would provide vital and unknown information about this place. The place is a temple and a place of pilgrimage for the devotees of Shirdi Sai Baba. Therefore, please do reconsider the deletion and reinstate the article, as it would benefit the thousands of pilgrims who are now seeking information on this new place of miracles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srarun (talk • contribs) 14:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Integral yoga
Hi Shrikanthv. I took alook at Integral yoga; here are my (first?) comments: A lot of work to do indeed! Succes,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   04:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The lead is quite long, and does not really summarize the article, but is almost an introduction to the topic
 * The article misses an intriduction c.q. background: what's it about, what's the background of Aurobindo's ideas? By whom was he influenced? What's the role of Vivekananda? Who's Vishnu Bhaskar Lele?
 * Much of the lead could be part of such an introduction
 * The section "The goal of integral yoga" could be moved upward

PS: the following sources may be usefull: Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   06:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Robert A. McDermott (2001), Introduction, in The Essential Aurobindo
 * Peter Heehs (2008), The Lives of Sri Aurobindo, Columbia University Press, ISBN 0-231-14098-3


 * Hi JJ, Thanks for the sources I have already used these sources for biography article :) Shrikanthv (talk) 07:32, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Chandrashekar Kupperi
Hello Shrikanthv, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chandrashekar Kupperi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 20:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Integral Yoga & Integral psychology
Hi Shrikanthv. I think that Integral Yoga and Integral psychology (Sri Aurobindo) could be merged; what do you think? Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   08:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * do not have an Idea now!, its quite complicated as the second subject is a derivative work from the first and the subject Integral Yoga itself has too much text to be filled up with while Integral psychology (Sri Aurobindo) is a derivative work from few of his followers, its a messy thing now so have given myself some break before jumping on to editing this topics. but you have to be surgicaly carefull, as the claims of derivative or interpretation can be misqouted to be the actuall! Shrikanthv (talk) 08:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I have an academic degree in Integral Yoga of Aurobindo. The psychology one can/should be merged into Yoga one. --<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra T 13:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * How wonderfull to hear is there a degree course for Integral yoga ! never heard of it before but nice to hear, I think its better we take this discussion to relevant talk page as many others can join. Shrikanthv (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Firstshowreview
Hi Shrikanthv! Thank you for showing interest in our page. This is to inform you that I have declined the deletion of page Firstshowreview because it does not violate of the regulations. The page does not have any promotional or advertising content. You can check other pages who have similar content such as bollywood hungama etc. Please let us know if you are not satisfied with our explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malayalammovie2013 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Tata group
Whad do you mean by merge with a redirect? Probably move.Xx236 (talk) 09:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Ooo wrong placement, Correcting it Shrikanthv (talk) 09:55, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: "Not using Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising at Shravya Varma"
I understand Wikipedia article creation policy and i am no where breaching the codes and conduct. request you to remove the warning tag. I work for an organization where i manage the digital images of renowned celebrities and artist. you should understand the purpose of creating an article on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itsmeesathya (talk • contribs) 07:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Nice that you are contributing I have nothing against paid editing, but be sure there is very thin line with biopics! on wheather its promotion or not Shrikanthv (talk) 07:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Paid editing? Like in WP:COI?  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   07:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * NB: wasn't that article deleted? Has it been recreated?  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   07:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Shrikanthv We don't encourage paid editing, we are here to create article who are having maximum media presence and people do search them on internet. *Itsmeesathya (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 6 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Integral yoga page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=684372943 your edit] caused an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F684372943%7CIntegral yoga%5D%5D Ask for help])

Are you aware of this comedy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/_Kautilya3

He has included your name with mine.

I never had any interaction with you but this guy has some serious problems.

This was his reply to this

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/NA122

He even accused two users of being RAW employee. --The Avengers (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

This is seriously funny let's wait and watch Shrikanthv (talk) 04:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

SPI Noitice [sic]
Hello Shrikanthv, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. SPI case is opened against you here. And you are suspected sock of Kautilya3. Thank you. -- Human 3015   TALK   17:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * LOL!!!! Is this serious?!? Shrikanthv and Kautilya3 socks? No way! Not in a million years!  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   19:13, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Anyway, as per that SPI nominator I'm also sock of Kautilya3. Rather I'm primary and main sock of Kautilya3.-- Human 3015   TALK   19:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Poor JJ. He is feeling left out. I will be glad to welcome you as my sock JJ, any time! - Kautilya3 (talk) 19:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * hehe did not expect this, maybe nominators home media has driven him mad 😀Shrikanthv (talk) 04:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Nonono. I'm a sock of VictoriaGrayson (or vice versa), as everybody knows. Maybe Ms Sarah Welch is also a sock of us, so, we're in good company. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   04:48, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * By the way, AP always uses those smileys, so that's definitve proof: Shrikanthv is AP. I was already wondering why AP wasn't mentioned in that SPI. Got you there!  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   04:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Well apparently, NA122 is a sock himself! . Amazing! - Kautilya3 (talk) 15:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * your Wiki-intuition is growing. "If it looks like, and smells like ..."  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   04:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I guess so. Two lessons learned from this experience. (1) The IPs important, because they allow us to connect the registered users. In between the accounts, the sockmasters make do with IPs, changing them almost everyday. (2) It is important to file SPI's even with inadequate evidence because the rival sockmasters watch them and they can connect the dots that we can't. - Kautilya3 (talk) 08:10, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * And some strange things that happen . - Kautilya3 (talk) 08:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I hope this was in light humor. I find it (mixed expression) since you could tell `Not in a million years in my case where the evidence presented was mistakenly attributed to me, (you can go back and check the archive). Well, we are past that. When I look back I do feel sorry for the weak and uncertain positions people like you took. To imagine that I & Blades & OZ are same person - Not in a million years. Wonder where was the intuition despite actually knowing me and knowing factually I was away. We could use my expertise but the closed group doesn't appreciate it, we all could improve (as person and the articles) and enjoy more. I definitely am proud of not reacting despite rude treatment and baiting. That is what Gautama taught. --<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra T 12:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Of course this was meant humorously, and not as a mean punch towards you. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   12:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, this was not the first SPI against, Blades had filed SPI against Kaultilya in past, though Blades himslef blocked as sock later. -- Human 3015   TALK   18:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You are right. There is more to it. The location of the respective organization from where they edited (Thinkmaths & K3) is in separate countries. I never thought they are same but there was high indication of knowing each other. K3 was using sock at some point and admitted it in SPI case (which presently has been deleted for privacy reasons). The blocking of Blades was unfortunate, there is no behavioral evidence, I can confidently say s/he is not OZ in a million years. --<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra T 01:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I think we are disturbing Shrikanthv very much by commenting here again and again, still, K3 has a alternative account named which is declared in his talk page. K3's current account is around a year old but he admitted various time that he is editing Wikipedia since 4 years as IP. As name of ThinkMath suggest that he is interested in Math, same way as written by K3's, he created another account SindHind for editing topics related to Astronomy and Maths. So interest in same subject may have lead to think that he is sock of ThinkMath. But they were not. I can't say anything about Blades. I have never interacted with him. I had some interaction with OZ. I have joined Wikipedia in 2015 itself, I don't know deep history of old editors, though I many times read old archives of many investigations and talk pages. -- Human 3015   TALK    02:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Apology Shrikanthv, any inconvenience was unintentional. --<span style="font-family: Tahoma, Geneva, sans-serif;color: #FF9933">AmritasyaPutra T 02:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * No probs, but could see editors getting way swayed and getting attached to what they write! (including me:) ), it would be fine if we divide the the written stuff from the writer ! Shrikanthv (talk) 09:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Modi
Hi! After proposing merger, you have to start a merger discussion giving your rationale for the proposal. The discussion should be started at the talk page of the proposed target article i.e. Talk:Narendra Modi in this case. You have missed that. So please start the discussion. Similarly, when tagging an article for COI you need to state your concerns on the talk page i.e. Talk:Public image of Narendra Modi in this case. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 16:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I can comment once you start discussion at talk page with your rationale, but before that just a friendly advice to you. This has been discussed very recently 2-3 times. Public image article was nominated for AfD recently with same kind of merge rationale and COI, but it was closed just 10 days ago with "keep" result. Another indirect discussion about this topic was of AfD of List of slogans by Narendra Modi, read here with result of "merge" to Public image article. So there is strong consensus regarding this article to "keep" and all these discussions are very recent ones. So I think there is no need to start it again within 15 days. -- Human 3015   TALK   18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

HI, Did not knew what was going on these pages & have not edited nor involved in these pages for a while now but after this got some how got intertwingled, I agree with you H Shrikanthv (talk) 09:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks wish you the same Shrikanthv (talk) 06:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Mirra Alfassa
Thanks for providing the photos to Mirra Alfassa. I did some fixes therein, as per the edit tags active since 2014. Since you seem to be interested in the subject, please fix the references style, too, paying close attention to RS and the wiki links that lead to wrong articles. Zezen (talk) 18:15, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Metatron's Cube
Hi there. I saw that you made a comment about Flower of Life so perhaps you would like to comment about the proposed deletion of Metatron's Cube, which I believe is of the same significance and basis, although the article is presently not as developed. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 07:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Indian people
Hello, User:Shrikanthv i would like to notify that User:Kkm010 has been disturbing ethnic infobox on this page. I have told him again and again that infobox is not a gallery for every well known Indian person, however he keeps widening it and cluttering the page. The current infobox has been kept nuteral for a reasion as it gives better representation of women and minorities. I would also like to note that i have sourced and worked on this page for past week and there is still a lot to sourced, particularly in history section. 117.192.201.56 (talk) 19:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Chandni Sharma
Hello!! Thanks for visiting the article I created Chandni Sharma. I noticed you placed a few tags on the article which I removed by mistake without fixing the problem. I would like to know what can be done to remove those tags. As I am new to wikipedia I am still learning and I read you quoted that the creator is closely connected to the person whose article is that but let me clear this I not at all connected to that person and the tag regarding original research for that all the links and sources have been added. So will you please tell me what efforts can be made to make the article neutral and tag free. And please help me provide with the guidelines to create a better article. As I am a beauty pageant enthusiast and have keen interest in beauty pageants and its performers and I would like to make better articles of notable subjects related to beauty pageants. Zack Martin 2000 (talk) 07:57, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Chowdavarapu Vishwanatham
Please read before tagging articles as unreferenced. The referencing was poorly done, but it was there in the very first edit. Lady of  Shalott  02:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Tito Dutta (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Tito Dutta (talk) 13:47, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Talkback message from Maslowsneeds
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Maslowsneeds (talk) 17:08, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Shrikanthv knows the policies. Two rigthfull reverts do not constitute edit-warring.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   21:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * thanks JJ it was just a AFD disscussion, I do not know why it was getting reverted little odd Shrikanthv (talk) 06:52, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon starts in 24 hours
Hello, Thanks a lot for signing up as a participant in the Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon. We want to inform you that this edit-a-thon will start in next 24 hours or so (25 January 0:00 UTC). Here are a few handy tips: Thank you and happy editing. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ⓵ Before starting you may check the rules of the edit-a-thon once again.
 * ⓶ A resource section has been started, you may check it here.
 * ⓷ Report the articles you are creating and expanding. If a local event page has been created on your Wikipedia you may report it there, or you may report it on the Meta Wiki event page too. This is how you should add an article— go to the  section where you have added you name, and beside that add the articles like this:   You don't need to update both on Meta and on your Wikipedia, update at any one place you want.
 * ⓸ If you are posting about this edit-a-thon- on Facebook or Twitter, you may use the hashtag #GIIND2016
 * ⓹ Do you have any question or comment? Do you want us to clarify something? Please ask it here.

Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Tito Dutta (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mysore Rosewood Inlay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yellow wood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

GI edit-a-thon 2016 updates
Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon 2016 has started, here are a few updates:
 * 1) More than 80 Wikipedians have joined this edit-a-thon
 * 2) More than 35 articles have been created/expanded already (this may not be the exact number, see "Ideas" section #1 below)
 * Infobox geographical indication has been started on English Wikipedia. You may help to create a similar template for on your Wikipedia.

If you are an experienced editor, become an ambassador. Ambassadors are community representatives and they will review articles created/expanded during this edit-a-thon, and perform a few other administrative tasks.
 * Become GI edit-a-thon language ambassador

Please translate this event page into your own language. Event page has been started in Bengali, English and Telugu, please start a similar page on your event page too.
 * Translate the Meta event page


 * Ideas
 * 1) Please report the articles you are creating or expanding here (or on your local Wikipedia, if there is an event page here). It'll be difficult for us to count or review articles unless you report it.
 * 2) These articles may also be created or expanded:
 * Geographical indication (en:Geographical indication)
 * List of Geographical Indications in India (en:List of Geographical Indications in India)
 * Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 (en:Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999)

See more ideas and share your own here.

Please see a few media coverages on this event: The Times of India, IndiaEducationDiary, The Hindu.
 * Media coverages

Please keep checking the Meta-Wiki event page for latest updates.
 * Further updates

All the best and keep on creating and expanding articles. :) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:46, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

7 more days to create or expand articles
Hello, thanks a lot for participating in Geographical Indications in India Edit-a-thon. We understand that perhaps 7 days (i.e. 25 January to 31 January) were not sufficient to write on a topic like this, and/or you may need some more time to create/improve articles, so let's extend this event for a few more days. The edit-a-thon will continue till 10 February 2016 and that means you have got 7 more days to create or expand articles (or imprpove the articles you have already created or expanded).

The rules remain unchanged. Please report your created or expanded articles.
 * Rules

Editors, who have not joined this edit-a-thon, may also join now. Reviewing of all articles should be done before the end of this month (i.e. February 2016). We'll keep you informed. You may also check the event page for more details.
 * Joining now
 * Reviewing articles

A special barnstar will be given to all the participants who will create or expand articles during this edit-a-thon. The editors, who will perform exceptionally well, may be given an Indic Geographical Indication product or object. However, please note, nothing other than the barnstar has been finalized or guaranteed. We'll keep you informed.
 * Prizes/Awards

Feel free to ask question(s) here. -- User:Titodutta (talk) sent using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Questions?

GI edit-a-thon updates
Thank you for participating in the Geographical Indications in India edit-a-thon. The review of the articles have started and we hope that it'll finish in next 2-3 weeks.
 * 1) Report articles: Please report all the articles you have created or expanded during the edit-a-thon here before 22 February.
 * 2) Become an ambassador You are also encouraged to become an ambassador and review the articles submitted by your community.

Prizes/awards have not been finalized still. These are the current ideas: We'll keep you informed.
 * Prizes/Awards
 * 1) A special barnstar will be given to all the participants who will create or expand articles during this edit-a-thon;
 * 2) GI special postcards may be sent to successful participants;
 * 3) A selected number of Book voucher/Flipkart/Amazon coupons will be given to the editors who performed exceptionally during this edit-a-thon.

We also want to inform you about the program Train-a-Wikipedian. It is an empowerment program where groom Wikipedians and help them to become better editors. This trainings will mostly be online, we may conduct offline workshops/sessions as well. More than 10 editors from 5 Indic-language Wikipedias have already joined the program. We request you to have a look and consider joining. -- Titodutta (CIS-A2K) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Train-a-Wikipedian

Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Thanks, Shrikanthv, for joining up so quickly and already contributing to our project. I picked your name up from the Indian notice board discussions. I see you placed "Mirra Alfassa's artistic works" in the DYK section but I cannot find an article with that name and the Mirra Alfassa article does not seem to have been nominated for DYK. Maybe it's something under development?--Ipigott (talk) 12:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi thanks for the invite, I am preparing some sources and material for edits to come, Thanks Shrikanthv (talk) 12:54, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

WP:INCOTM
Following the discussion, I have started this section, could you do initial works before we ask the larger team to participate? Or if you have any suggestions, please let me know. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:43, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Vidhi Mehta
vidhi mehta is known singer she also sung a happy ending movie songs and she was also a contestant of sa re ga ma u can google her name and u will get many refrence link about her u can see her video of live performance or official songs at youtube


 * please discuss this in relevent pages Shrikanthv (talk) 10:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Punjab edit-a-thon: Write for glory
Hello friend, A multilingual national-level edit-a-thon is being conducted at this moment with an aim to create or improve Punjab-related articles. A community that will create or expand the most number of articles during this edit-a-thon contest will be awarded a trophy during WikiConference India 2016. Best contributors' recognition may also be considered. We need your help here. Please join right now as a participant and help your community. Thanks and regards. --WikiConference India (2016) organizing team using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Click here to subscribe/unsubscribe.


 * Please join this edit-a-thon --Tito Dutta (talk) 19:20, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Rio Olympics Edit-a-thon
Dear Friends & Wikipedians, Celebrate the world's biggest sporting festival on Wikipedia. The Rio Olympics Edit-a-thon aims to pay tribute to Indian athletes and sportsperson who represent India at Olympics. Please find more details here. The Athlete who represent their country at Olympics, often fail to attain their due recognition. They bring glory to the nation. Let's write articles on them, as a mark of tribute.

For every 20 articles created collectively, a tree will be planted. Similarly, when an editor completes 20 articles, a book will be awarded to him/her. Check the main page for more details. Thank you. Abhinav619 (sent using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC), subscribe/unsubscribe)

Thank you for cookies
Hello Shrinkathv and thank you for your kind and welcoming message. Yes I enjoy editing, proof reading, copy editing and topics about spirituality and sports. I also have a particular admiration for Mirra Alfassa. Congratulations on creating a very good and positive page about her. Kind regards Maryanne Maryanne881 (talk) 02:11, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Krishna
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Krishna you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mahensingha -- Mahensingha (talk) 16:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

No connection with laira
Hello shirikanthv

This is for your clarity brother i have no connection with laira nor she is known to me anyway — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imrankhaider (talk • contribs) 21:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Samir abbas article was just written as a tribute to great journalist
I am not connected to samir. I wrote the article because he is a legend in the media industry. He has worked as a journalist for 17 years and remained on key posts. I thought i should add his information on wikipedia so that it comes in public domain. Being an indian brother i would request you to make any changes in the article but please remove the tag AFD. §Imrankhaider (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Imrankhaider, The only thing lacking in the article is notability, please go through this link and add reliable resources depecting his notability, I was unable to find resources. hope you will be able to add this then I will request for tag removal. Shrikanthv (talk) 05:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Link to reliable resource
Hi shrikanthv. As you said you cannot find reliable resources www.hindi.news18.com/tag/samir-abbas/ hope this link will serve the purpose as far the notabilty is concerned. He was awarded as indias best news anchor in 2013. If possible now kindly remove the tag brotherImrankhaider (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)


 * HI Imran, I would ask you to get some review from other senior editors if they have the same view we will close the discussion as keep Shrikanthv (talk) 09:05, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Dear shirkanthv

I am new on wikipedia and has no connection with senior editors nor do i know how to interact with them. Please if you feel we can improve the article then remove the tag. Moreover he comes every day on a nation wide channel as lead news anchor. Hence his notability or popularity cannot be doubted as News18 india is a leading channel. Kindly remove the tag brother i shall be thankful to you. Imrankhaider (talk) 17:09, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kunal madhiwala
Hello Shrikanthv. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kunal madhiwala, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Playing a non-extra role in a notable movie/TV show indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI). Thank you.  So Why  15:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh
How is adding his controversial status "Wp:NOTNEWS"?--Shinnosukeandme (talk) 09:27, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * hi refer to WP:NOTNEWS also, the thing you added is also a speculation Shrikanthv (talk) 09:31, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * also WP:BLPGOSSIP Shrikanthv (talk) 09:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not speculation... He has just been sentenced by court to jail for rape.--Shinnosukeandme (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * let us talk in the relavant talk page Shrikanthv (talk) 09:56, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay, please open the discussion then as I'm not sure what section you have problems with.--Shinnosukeandme (talk) 10:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Ram Rahim
His parents' names are already mentioned in the side bar with his picture. Why do you insist on mentioning that again in the early life section? PS: Why do you wrongly mention them as Sikh when his family is a dera followers .Sikhism clearly bars its adharents from following such deras where Guru Granth Sahib is not kept as the central scripture. They ARE ofcourse Jat, though, the fact which I did not delete. So do clarify this instead of indulging on the edit war.


 * Please take this discussion to relvant talk page Shrikanthv (talk) 13:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Krishna
The article Krishna you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Krishna for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Katolophyromai -- Katolophyromai (talk) 18:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Krishna
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hampi
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hampi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:20, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Ellora Caves and other articles in South Asian arts / monuments space articles
Shrikanthv: If you have time to continue our collaboration on GA nom/reviews, a few more articles have been scrubbed by our GOCE team and seem ready for GA noms. For example, see Ellora Caves. Thanks for the help, Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hampi
The article Hampi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hampi for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK process
Shrikanthv: The Hampi DYK is already approved. We can't add new ALTs, as any new ALT will require a restart of the DYK review. The Hampi ruins are not ancient, a term that generally is understood as before about 6th century CE. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 12:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Constructs
Greetings! An account has been tweaking the lede here, changing the page's scope contrary to the discussed consensus. Could you please keep an eye on it? Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 17:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Hampi
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Sri Aurobindo problem
Hi, in case the ping does not work, I've left at note at Talk:Sri Aurobindo about an edit that you made. It broke the citation but I am not sure what source you were then intending to refer to. It still shows as an error and, although I realise you are not terribly active here at the moment, I suspect you are best placed to fix it. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 18:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

please see my new section on sri aurobindo talk page
please see my new section on sri aurobindo talk page

feel free to delete this section i've added. thanks shrikanth — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demetrius333 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Revised text Sri Aurobindo
Following your notice, I have removed some material which I may drop, or revise later, and made a few changes. Please let me know whether there are any problems left in the text now. I have copied it into my Sandbox, kindly mark passages there, if needed. --Raimundo (talk) 07:51, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Performance fabrics‎
Thank you for iVoting. Could you sign as well, as I don't want to put a "this unsigned comment was made by ..." as it looks naff. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 12:50, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the compliment. Grateful. --Bugs2beatles 08:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bugs2beatles (talk • contribs)