User talk:Shrike/Archives/2011/June

מורה לגיטרה
Just to let you know, re your note on the user page, that we only RevDel phone numbers when they are clearly those of a minor. Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * But I think its like ad.You delete promotional material with email and etc?--Shrike (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Deleting's one thing. Taking it out of the history, making it viewable only by admins or even just oversighters, is another. Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi Shrike. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  F ASTILY  (TALK) 07:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Welcome
Hey Shrike! I believe that the WikiCommunity clearly states not to welcome vandals to Wikipedia, like you welcomed Jakebowles with this edit. GaneshBhakt (talk) 16:29, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * He made some OK edits I think after the last warning that the reason that admins didn't ban him but if I mistaken I am sorry.--Shrike (talk) 16:36, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Welcoming users
Very well then, I just thought that if a user, say, removed references without reason not knowing Wikipedia's guidelines then at least they would get a welcome before editing. SwisterTwister  talk  05:37, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:2.103.69.174


Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shrike (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

David Nathan (music writer)
I'd be interested to know why you added a WP:COI tag to that article. The fact that an IP claimed that there has been a COI doesn't mean it's true. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:07, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Becouse user:Davidpnathan edited this article and you gave notice about COI yourself if you fill that this tag is unwarranted you may remove it. --Shrike (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)