User talk:Shrinwanti Ghosh/sandbox AromataseInhibitor

This is where the peer review feedback for Shrinwanti Ghosh's sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 03:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

William Eastham Article Review
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Mostly. Might want to change the "seems" in the second sentence could be changed to "some research has found".

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? yes

Are the citations formatted correctly? yes

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? yes.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? The new aromatase inhibitor could be added to the types section.

Pearofapples (talk) 01:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

KH peer review
Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? The content is written in a neutral, unbiased tone.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? The citations follow the guidelines. It does not provide medical advice.

Are the citations formatted correctly? Citations formatted correctly. Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Unsure which content area it would be placed in. Writer should provide where content will be added to. If new header is made, writer should mention the name of sub-header being created also.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? No other areas of article. Unsure if writer would have more information on other medical uses. Gynecomastia lacks content and classmate can contribute if writer has more knowledge of this topic.

Kkher (talk) 04:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)