User talk:Shripadk1989

Welcome!
Hello, Shripadk1989, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 16:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Naryana sukta edits
Hi, it seems likely from the edit summaries at Narayana sukta that you are also the 117.* IP who has been contributing there today. If so, you really should try to avoid editing while logged out as it confuses people and in some cases can even undermine the assumption of good faith. I note that has opened a thread at the Talk:Narayana sukta. I would advise you not to revert CK any time soon, nor to reinstate the disputed content. Instead, talk it through in the discussion if you continue to be adverse to what is being presented in the article. If you do revert/reinstate then you will run the risk of being blocked from contributing for a period as you would be engaging in an edit war and perhaps even breaching our "bright line" three revert rule. I'll add a template below this message that explains our attitude regarding edit wars. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 16:45, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Narayana sukta. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 16:45, 29 June 2012 (UTC)