User talk:Shruti Bera

hi, I am shruti and Im a new user to wikipedia.

Sagar Wahi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sagar Wahi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Do not move this yourself. As you are paid, you must go through WP:AFC. Further, your paid disclosure is not adequate. You must disclose who is paying you and link to where you advertise your services. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * And now you've removed your disclosure entirely, which is a TOU violation and you may be blocked for a failure to disclose. see WP:PAID. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Asheema Vardaan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Asheema Vardaan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello Shruti Bera. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Shruti Bera. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:23, 6 July 2022 (UTC)


 * hello PRAXIDICAE, im a learner / new wikipedia creator, and ive added that i was paid to create the article on my user page by mistake. apologies for the inconvenience. Shruti Bera (talk) 15:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * No one mistakenly says they are paid and given the fact you're just one in a series of paid editors trying to create this, I don't believe you. It would honestly just be easier if you and the others would just stop trying to be deceitful and actually follow policy. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Sagar Wahi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sagar Wahi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sagar Wahi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:42, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Keshav Uppal moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Keshav Uppal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Asheema Vardaan


The article Asheema Vardaan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:PROMO, paid spam"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Keshav Uppal
Hello, Shruti Bera. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keshav Uppal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Keshav Uppal


Hello, Shruti Bera. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Keshav Uppal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:44, 14 January 2023 (UTC)