User talk:Shshshsh/Archive 32

Evilness is back baby
How are? The Evil one has returned... Mwwwooaahaaa. Not to his evil ways. But just in spirit. Himalayan Explorer was just too cautious and meditative...The Evil One has more personality and presence! Dr. Blofeld      White cat 18:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Moooaaaahaaahhaa! Hey I heard Shilpa got married. Didn't even know she was dating that guy. From what I read in the press she has often been single or denied relationships! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 21:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Dear shshshsh, as much as i respect your rather 'continuous' trials to keep wikipedia safe and good and whatever you may call it, but don't think you should respect other people's contributions too.as far as i know wikipedia is for everyone, and if you read the wiki rules carefully, we don't have to give references for every piece of information we provide and also i am not as 'experienced' like you or this is what i do for a major part of my time.i am slowly learning the ropes so sir/ma'am please be a little more understanding for beginners like me. also if possible please try to research for facts on the info i had given if you have spare time. when i completely know how refrence can be given properly, i will surely give it.

have a good day. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tallandhandsome (talk • contribs) 15:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

THANKS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tallandhandsome (talk • contribs) 16:36, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Do you still remember me??
LOL ;) --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 16:48, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Mwwwoooahahahaaa! Hey Shahid check out the expansion! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 17:36, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Evilness has returned! Mr. Bigglesworth says Meeeeooowwww. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 20:24, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm reverting your POV here. That's blatant vandalism. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 12:55, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Hehee. Hey I'm thinking of buying this with my Christmas money. What is the best Amitabh biography you know of? Dr. Blofeld       White cat 13:20, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you recommend a good Amitabh biography? Dr. Blofeld       White cat 13:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

OMG that's freaky! That must be the weirdest charatcer Amitabh has ever played. Why though does the subject of the film give me the impression they were inspired by Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett ? Jack (film)  also deals with that sort of thing..  Dr. Blofeld       White cat 13:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Heyy buddy! I'm terribly sorry for the late response. I'm doing fine!! How are you?? I am currently off from University until January. I desperately need a break. Can't believe that it has been nearly three months since I left Wikipedia in Septemeber... :S
 * Anyways, I basically used this weekend to catch up on all the movies that I missed... and boy have I missed a lot. I recently watched Wake up Sid, Ajab Prem Ki Ghazab Kahani, Kurbaan, Main Aurr Mrs Khanna, Paa, Dil Bole Hadippa & What's Your Raashee?. So what have you been upto these days?? What movies have you watched recently?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 17:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Why do you have little time with WP?? Are you leaving?? I did mention a lot of films but baring WUS, Kurbaan & Paa, I didn't like any of the of the other films. With all the films Bollywood has made this year, 2009 has been quite disappointing so far -- this is partly due to the multiplex-producers' strike that lasted for almost 2-3 months :( Which ones did you like?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 19:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)


 * ARE YOU OKAY??? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 16:28, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * You took the words right out of my mouth!! :) I absolutely hated MAMK; I don't know WTH Kareena was thinking when she signed the film. As for Rani, I seriously don't know what she is doing to her career. She is such a talented actress and I don't know why she is still working with Yash Raj Films. :(
 * And now for the awards: I think that the Filmfare Best Actor Award will most definitely go to Mr. Bachchan for Paa. Other than him, Aamir for 3 Idiots is another strong contender. Ms. Chopra & Ms. Kapoor will be vying for the Filmfare Best Actress Award though without any bias, I think that the latter will be receiving it. What do you think?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 23:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Only time will tell which actors win awards next year. Shahid... remember I told you about adding "other" awards to Bollywood actors' filmographies (Star Screen, Zee Cine, IIFA, Stardust). Well, what do you think about this?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 23:12, 19 December 2009 (UTC)


 * What do you mean by this "But, many of the categories mustt be moved and reordered before to avoid second formatting thereafter."?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 16:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Shahid do you know anyone that can redirect the Three Idiots page back to 3 Idiots?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 17:25, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy Christmas!
Happy Christmas Shahid! Unlike sunny Aus it is snowing here at the moment and very cold!!! Basic Instinct was on again last night and Sharon Stone is definately the sexiest living American actress I've seen on screen. She does more for me than even Jolie or Basinger! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 14:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Hehe well it lit up on my watchlist. I actually tried to revert him but you beat me to it! Dr. Blofeld      White cat 21:50, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank You my dear friend!! :) Shahid, I wanted to discuss with you a new change that I am thinking to make on the List of highest-grossing Bollywood films article. Instead of having two separate charts from BOI & IBOS for each section of the article, I was thinking of having one chart with all the information for each section of the article. Look below for what I am talking about. Since BOI is currently making updates for its list of highest grossing films, adjusted for inflation, and IBOS doesn't include the films released pre 1970, we should leave the inflation adjusted list the way it is. By having one chart for the films, it would reduce the length of the article as well as it make it look more tidy. There is only one official source (Box Office Mojo) for American films but we have two sources (BOI & IBOS) for Bollywood films. Since we don't know which source to use, and instead of having two separate charts for each aspect of the article, it would be best to have one unified chart.

Everything over here is pretty straight forward. For the final chart, we will look at what BOI & IBOS have and then make an average/final net gross amount for the film. What do you say?? Does it sound like an appropriate idea?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 17:25, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If we were to remove the "average/final net gross" of the film, then how would we know in which order to list the films?? That is why I intended to have that section so that it would be helpful in helping us determine the order we list the films. BOI & IBOS have completely different films in their Top 30 [although there are some similarities between the two]... and this proves to be very confusing. What do you suggest we do? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 21:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The chart is formatted in a sortable and will thus allow people to list the films in gross amount according to each site (just by the click of a button). Therefore, I suggested that we have an average net gross of the film, which we would use to order the film. BTW Shahid, what would happen if we were to completely remove the collections reported on IBOS and only use BOI as the official source?? I know that there are two sources for box office figures but come to think of it, in all Bollywood articles, BOI is used to report box office figures and not IBOS. Fruthermore, we are only using BOI to report sources for overseas figures then why should we include IBOS in this article?? Another point to note is that when this article was first created, the person only used BOI but somewhere down the line, the figures from IBOS were added. IMO, we should just use BOI for box office figures as it has been mentioned in several leading Indian newspapers (like TOI, Indiatimes) and this is the source that is primarily used in all Bollywood articles on Wikipedia. What do you say?? Regards --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 16:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What do you think about this? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 16:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * By looking at the nomination for the Star Screen Awards, who do you think will win?? ;) --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 18:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
Happy New Year to you and Mr. Dreamz! May 2010 be a good one for you and Bollywood on wikipedia! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 12:28, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Happy 2010 Shahid!! ;) Wishing you and your family a year full of happiness and prosperity. Regards --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 19:33, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

LOL its 2010 and both Shilpa's "upcoming" films still say it is expected to be released in 2009. The Man is even titled as 2008 film! Can you sort it out? Dr. Blofeld       White cat 12:00, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

YIKES! Woke up this morning and it is like being in the middle of Siberia! It is extremely rare to get HEAVY SNOW where i live on the southern coast. I opened my window this morning and a huge block of snow fell into my room! Its like 3 feet thick already and snowing hard.... Apparently this is the coldest winter in 30 years.... All the cars outside are completely covered in snow mounds!! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 09:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Sock abuse
Hi again, how's it going? User:Mrpontiac1, the egregious sock who we're familiar with is back. I've just finished tagging dozens of newly confirmed socks. I've already reverted some of the unconstructive edits. He's now up to at least 67 confirmed sock accounts and doubtless many more IPs. Could I ask you to go through his account and revert more of it since he has a conspicuous interest in, among other things, your area of expertise, Indian cinema? Thanks. Nirvana888 (talk) 01:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

What do you think of...
having only "one" table that ranks the highest-grossing Bollywood films in India according to BOI. Then, we would have a separate section to indicate how much the film has grossed as mentioned on IBOS.

--  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 06:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Inquiries
I did reply to your message after I came back from the break, although it might be a bit out of date  YellowMonkey  ( bananabucket )  00:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Have a listen!
Hello!! Have a listen to this. Its the album I'm currently jamming along too. This thought is the saddest and most beautiful track on the album. Let me know what you think? Everything OK? Dr. Blofeld      White cat 16:31, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Urdu? What the heck! What does that have to do with Bollywood? Isn't it spoken in Pakistan and by minorites in other parts of India? I find that odd as it is the Hindi industry.... I thought you'd like that album. I'm really into jazz fusion stuff at the moment, guitarists like Neal Schon and Larry Carlton. They are so underated as guitarists and are more talented than most of the people in the charts put together... But coverage of their work and much of jazz is so poorly covered on here so I think i'll be doing a bit of work in this area. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 17:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

to the person above me...for your information mate...Urdu and Hindi are generally regarded as two standardized registers of one language, although they are written in different scripts and draw vocabulary from separate languages. Urdu is based on Arabic / Persian loanwords; Hindi is based more on Sanskrit words - and just so you know...Urdu has A LOT to do with Bollywood...some of the greatest classics such as Mughal-E-Azam (1960), Pakeezah (1972) and Umrao Jaan (1981) were in Urdu. The word Pakeezah itself is an Urdu word. to add to that my friend....Urdu was developed in India during the Mughal Empire....it's an official language in a number of states and is not spoken by "minorities" - please get your information correct before you make such comments. last point...if they were so different, how is it that i understand spoken Hindi when in fact i'm an Urdu speaker myself? i apologise if i sound rude mate; please don't get offended, no hard feelings. thanks. Mk762007 (talk) 05:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

New message
Shahid, as you know, I have another copy of Kapoor's article in my sandbox, and have added several new information. When I decide to add the information to Kapoor's original article, will I have to update the accessdate for all the references according to when I posted it on the Kareena Kapoor article? Or can I just leave them the way they are? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 20:06, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks buddy for your generosity! :) I will be shortly updating Kapoor's article with information on her recent 2009 releases. When you have the time, take a look at this and tell me what you think of it. :) Regards --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 17:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Shahid, I remember I asked you a similar question to this when Golmaal Returns released back in 2008. As you know, when unadjusted for inflation, 3 Idiots is officially the highest-grossing Bollywood film of all time. In addition to this, the film has grossed more than the inflation adjusted collection of K3G. Does this mean that 3 Idiots is officially Bebo's biggest commercial success?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 18:55, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Shania
Hey Shahid check out American Idol. The screen clip is weird proportions but this woman is looking as gorgeous as ever huh? I love everything about her, personality and looks!! Dr. Blofeld       White cat 22:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC) I must admit I don't usually watch X Factor or any of those but I have been watching it is this series. Annoyingly though the Chicago one was the only one I missed on TV so far!!! But whenever Shania is in the room she makes me feel happy!! I love it too when she cackles too in her Canadian accent! Really cute. Dr. Blofeld      White cat 22:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

See what I mean, even scientists claim Shania has the perfect face here. Does make you wonder though why these scientists have time to spend on researching women's faces when they could be doing things into cancer research and global warming!! Dr. Blofeld      White cat 23:14, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

IMDB
Hi Shshshsh. Is IMDB considered a reliable source in general? For example, can we use it as a citation for specifics about someone like Shankar (actor)? (I'm asking this in the context of the unreferenced blp deletion drive.) Thanks. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 03:23, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. There are hundreds of articles on Bollywood cinematographers, producers, and lesser known actors that are facing deletion. I guess a reference to imdb to support a statement "has done xyz thing on abc film" would work. --RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 17:27, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Nothing has been nominated yet. But, if you see the links in this discussion, all unreferenced BLPs are likely to be speedy deleted. Abecedare has made a list of unreferenced Indian BLPs here and, if you scan through the list, you'll see that lots of them are Bollywood related.--RegentsPark (sticks and stones) 18:53, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

National Film Awards
Hey, long time, hope you are well.

I was looking through the National Film Award Winners and noticed there are some massive flaws in the procedure. For example, Fashion was censored and released in 2008, and Priyanka Chopra got the National Award in 2010. But the article says 2009. What's the best way to go about it?
 * Note being some films are submitted to the Film Awards commitee after being censored, not released. So films like Paruthi Veeran (2007) and Naan Kadavul (2009) are counted in 2006 and 2008 as they were censoed then. Universal Hero (talk) 13:40, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah sure, I'll start on some articles then. Universal Hero (talk) 14:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Confused
I remember that you told me that ultimately, the inflation adjusted collections mattered the most in determining an actor's biggest commercial success. I know that 3 Idiots has grossed way more than the inflation adjusted collection of K3G (as reported on the List of highest-grossing Bollywood films); as a matter of fact, it has also grossed more than the inflation adjusted collections of Sholay. (Does this mean that it has replaced Sholay as the highest-grossing Bollywood film of all time when adjusted for inflation?) BOI is still updating their site and we have no idea how the inflation adjusted list looks like. Don't you think that in the 9 years since K3G released, the film has gone on to earn a lot more than the collections of 3 Idiots?

(P.S. Have you heard about Ms. Chopra's & Ms. Ranaut's recent win at the National Film Awards?? Do you think they deserved it?? ;)) --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 22:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks buddy!! When it comes to box office collections, I easily get confused but your explanation really helped a lot... :D IMO, there are a lot of great actors that should have been awarded the NFA for their wonderful performances; for e.g. Urmila's performance in Bhoot, Rani in Black & Karisma in Fiza/Zubeidaa. Speaking of Ms. Mukerji... it looks like she finally learnt her lesson ;) (P.S. Don't worry, I have no intention in changing the inflation adjusted list as I know that both BOI & IBOS are currently updating their sites.) --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 02:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Leona Lewis
Do you like Leona Lewis? When her hair is Afro like she reminds me of Noémie Lenoir. Lewis has quite a strong jaw though doesn't she, pretty girl but a little mannish? Half the time she looks like a Brazilian drag queen, do you see what I mean LOL? Dr. Blofeld      White cat 19:40, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Did you not find that funny? Oh well. Have a look at the developments of the Clint Eastwood article. I've reached 1976 now.. And I cut a lot of the early sections into seperate articles too!! This is going to take months to write as I have another book too which I will usuae to probably balance the sources. Then it can be copyedited and written into one sound article. If you remember what the articles was like just a few months ago... Dr. Blofeld       White cat 16:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Only on the short lower sections because I haven't written those yet!! The paragraphs up to 1977 are substantial enough to make seperate sections valid. Remember that the whole article will be written like this and then condensed later after I've gone through with the other book source and balanced out references. Once it is completed trust me there will be no disruption of prose or anything, not in my view anyway...

What email? ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 14:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Nope. I got your reply to me from the discussion with you about hot Bollywood actresses but I only received one email from you. You should also have several... ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 21:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

What do you think of
...creating new pages for each Filmfare Award ceremony? Every award ceremony [from each year] in Hollywood has a page of its own and yet NONE of the Bollywood awards have one. Since Filmfare is the oldest and most prominent award ceremony in India, we can start off first by creating articles for the past decade and then slowly move back? I have always dreamt of having separate pages for each ceremony. I know its a lot of work but with a bit of patience and time, I think that we will be slowly able to make it happen. --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 04:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you think it is a better idea to start work on one year and after it is closed to being done then start working on another year? Or would you rather prefer us to work on different years simultaneously? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 01:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey! wait a sec
Do you expect ANYONE to create a complete filmography of a singer in a single day? Why don't you try it out?

Instead of deleting the whole table, you could have added to the filmography. Look at Alka Yagnik - this article has a filmography (not a tabled one, but its there all the same). Im reverting my edit. And please, next time, add - don't subtract.

Ankitbhatt (talk) 12:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

FA
Yey my FA collobration (and photo I uploaded) are today's featured article! ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 01:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I've helped promote them. The McDonalds Bike Center and the Jay Pritzker Pavilion article from Millenium Park too also reached FA. I helped with copyediting/images mostly. Major credit though goes to Ruig and Tony. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 16:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Haaa LOL. Check out the last post on Runa Akiyama AFD. Has he proved my point? ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 12:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Nope, no email. You seem to be having problems emailing me. Such read a message from me in your email and click reply. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 22:51, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I just received it. It must take a while being send from ten thousand miles away that's all!! I've replied. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 22:54, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

See you're still have trouble. Hey you know I have thousands of CDs. My favourite instrumental rock album. Check out this. Listen to the first five tracks. Now compare the guitar to most bands around these days. 1000 times more talented. Let me know what you think. I'd strongly recommend this album. Its really good to chill out to too. I am addicted to playing along with Neal Schon and Larry Carlton CDs now! ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 10:17, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Listen to track 4 all the way through. Turn it up full volume, lie down or sit down comfortably, close your eyes and just float away. Just experience the emotions and senses of it. You will be amazed. It leaves you feeling different to before you started. That is real music that has the power to "tap into your soul". ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 10:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for deleting my edit at page Preity Zinta Jaisinghpur (talk) 15:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

How can I upload a legal photo
The picture of Ameesha Patel used on the page is quite old (taken mid-2006) and I want to use a new and better portrait of hers from a public appearance. I would like to use this photo (taken early 2008) on her page:

http://www.itimes.com/public/amisha.patel/album/Amishas-photos/photo/97450

How do you think I can get it with the website's approval. I tried to read their conditions but I didn't find anything that can help me with it, I tried contacting them as well. Also, do check the page if you think it needs expansion and if the language used is proper since my level in English isn't very high but I tried my best.

Aryan1992 (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Emailed
I've emailed. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 11:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Replied! Hope you are well. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 19:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Doesn't surprise me, funny that he got caught out though. When is this user going to give up like all the others? ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 11:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

See User talk:Yumegusa. Do you see any personal attack? ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 14:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Have you seen My Name Is Khan?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 19:02, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

There really is no point in wasting your time on him. He will never see your view on the subject. As for CANVASSING, I've had the Bollywood article on my watchlist for yonks... And I'm still not seeing anything sorted. Shahid please take it to an adminstrator to settle it. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 21:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Nice work! If only the others would getting on with what really matters... Content.. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 22:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Request
Shahid, I hold both Anupam and you in high regard for your contributions to wikipedia, and therefore am disheartened seeing recent acrimony and edit-warring between the two of you (I won't attempt apportioning the blame). It reminds me of the internecine "warfare" that took place among WPIndia editors a couple of years back, which finally reached arbcom and resulted in a few editors being banned and worse, many other editors giving up and retiring from wikipedia (ask User:YellowMonkey about it). It would be very sad if the current dispute, which really is over a very minor matter, went down that path. So I would urge both of you (and other involved editors) to take a step back, reconsider if the dispute is the best use of your time and effort, and if you think it's worth pursuing, approach WP:MEDCAB or WP:MEDCOM to get help resolving the dispute. It would be undesirable for both you as individual editors and the WPIndia project, if the dispute escalated much further and resulted in blocks or topic bans. Hope you consider this request (which I am posting on Anupam's page too). Abecedare (talk) 22:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

You are edit warring about use of Urdu script in film articles
Hello Shshshsh. I have read WP:AN3 and the supporting arguments. It is clear to me that both you and User:Anupam have broken our rule against edit-warring, and you could both be blocked. To avoid this outcome, I suggest that you promise to stop adding or removing Urdu script from articles from now until 31 March. If an uninvolved admin closes the discussion about use of Urdu and announces a consensus, then this would settle the matter, and you could resume editing with regard to Urdu. This would allow the 3RR case to be closed with no action against you. The same deal applies to Anupam. Let me know what you decide. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Discussion at User talk:EdJohnston.


 * Please reconsider your position. You and Anupam are both valued contributors, and it is unfortunate if any sanctions are required. If Anupam takes the deal and you do not, it will be necessary to block you alone. Since the issue has been presented at WP:AN3, it is now my job to find a solution, and the #1 duty of that board is to stop edit wars. It should not be a surprise that admins want reverting to stop (on both sides) until the discussion finds an answer.  EdJohnston (talk) 13:08, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Do I understand that you are declining my offer? EdJohnston (talk) 18:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Hey i read all your discussion on Bollywood and i'm really surprised how much you went ahead in defending hindi script. Don't know what to say but i appreciate your efforts. --Onef9day (talk) 06:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Result of the 3RR complaint
Please see the result of WP:AN3, which contains a warning to you. Though you would not voluntarily accept the standstill deal on Urdu script, you are nonetheless bound by the result of the 3RR. You are welcome to ask for an uninvolved admin to close the discussion on use of Urdu, but until that discussion is formally closed, no more reverts must occur, on either side. If reverting continues, blocks may be issued. EdJohnston (talk) 20:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

New message
Yes I have. SRK and Kajol still have the same chemistry from their first film Baazigar and continue to prove why they are the best pair in Bollywood. Kajol is great as always but SRK delivers an outstanding performance. Overall, it was a pretty good movie and a good departure for KJo from making films like KKHH & K3G. :) (P.S. Shahid how would you list 3 Idiots revenue? According to BOI, the film has grossed Rs. 201,38,00,000. Would you list it as Rs. 1,201 million or 2,014 million?? --  Bollywood Dreamz  talk 19:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

My misguided reversion
I apologize for my reversion of List of Rajputs with the comment about a "POV-pusher" yesterday. I was reverting a number of inappropriate edits made in the last few days by someone who is a readily identifiable POV-pusher, including an addition he made to the article's talk page, and I must have gotten seriously distracted. (That same user did make a revision to the article on February 28 that was reverted.) Thanks for catching it and taking care of it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Apologies
My sincere apologies :) I didn't know :) -- FA IL ! Talk 22:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Vidya Balan birth year
Are you sure about Vidya's birth year? Her official website (if it is indeed her official website) says 1982! I myself am not very sure about this, it's really confusing! How do you assume she was born in 1978, did she herself confirm it anywhere? Johannes003 (talk) 10:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring
Don't worry, I have the same problem. Hey do you think Bullock deserved the Oscar? I'm really happy for her I think she's lovely. Cute and funny. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 21:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)