User talk:Shubhamco

May 2016
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Sorry (Justin Bieber song) with this edit, without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:41, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Purpose (Justin Bieber album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — I B  [ Poke  ] 12:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Purpose (Justin Bieber album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Purpose (Justin Bieber album). ''Do NOT add twitter sources and facebook pages to upgrade certifications. You have been warned before also, and I have reported to WP:AIV, so stop or get blocked from editing.'' — I B  [ Poke  ] 09:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Purpose (Justin Bieber album). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 12:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Purpose (Justin Bieber album). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed  12:47, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.