User talk:Shubhamelle

Welcome!

 * }

October 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Teckmakers has been reverted. Your edit here to Teckmakers was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/teckmakers) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:26, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Teckmakers
Hello Shubhamelle,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Teckmakers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Ish dar  ian  10:58, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Teckmakers, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   11:14, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm Lakun.patra. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Graphic Era Hill University because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Lakun.patra (talk) 08:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Graphic Era University. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Graphic Era University was changed by Shubhamelle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975349 on 2015-01-15T08:44:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Graphic Era University, you may be blocked from editing. EricEnfermero (Talk) 08:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Graphic Era University. —Bruce1eetalk 08:48, 15 January 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 08:51, 15 January 2015 (UTC)