User talk:Shweeny666

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks.  Wh e  re  (talk) 22:49, 12 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Having looked at this editors edits. I am concerned that they edits may be from a BNP POV and will be reverting them.--RunningMan 18:41, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to British National Party, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Robdurbar 14:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Please quit vandalizing the BNP page. I have had to reverse several edits over the last few days. User:David L Rattigan 13:53 04 May 2006 GMT

Image Tagging for Image:Pete griffin family guy.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Pete griffin family guy.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:13, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Adolf Hitler was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 00:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- Karada 00:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

{{unblock}.}

Child
I think this user may well be a child. Who doesn't realise that Wkipedia is ot his own scrtach pad. Failing that I'd check for potential Sock Puppets.--RunningMan 12:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

BNP Vandalism
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to BNP. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. HawkerTyphoon 22:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to BNP, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. HawkerTyphoon 14:42, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

If there is one more unconcstructive edit to the BNP page, I will be asking for a permanent block. I am fed up with you making insulting changes to a legitimate political parties enyclopeadia article - if you don't like them, write them a letter. This is not a place for you to soapbox your views. Stop it, it's not accomplishing anything.

You've been blocked for exactly the same sort of vandalism before. I'm blocking you for two days. When you come back, if you can't keep your politics out of the British National Party article, then don't edit it. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

One more vandalism or personal attack against another user within the next 24 hours, as you have done repeatedly on British National Party, and I will report you directly to an administrator. HawkerTyphoon 23:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks
I have reverted your personal attacks on User:HawkerTyphoon and User:Dogville. I see you have been warned about personal attacks before. Therefore, you know that making them is against Wikipedia policy and grounds for blocking. Do not continue. Powers 14:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to British National Party
Hello, You can't just place a link in the middle of an article. If you would like to discuss how and if said link is to be incorporated in the article, take it to the talk page. Thank you and happy editing --– sampi ( talk • contrib • email ) 18:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Archived Talk pages
Your edit on the Talk:British National Party/Archive 3 page has been moved to Talk:British National Party. Please note that talk pages are habitually archived when they become too large, so users with slower computers can upload them more easily. --Robdurbar 21:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Request for Permanent Block
Me, and many other users on this site, are fed up with your constant vandalism. Wikipedia is NOT a soapbox, and surely you know this by now. You are wasting my precious time, and you should be warned that I am about one bad edit away from making a request for you to be banned from Wikipedia, Permanently. Any users who feel the same way should note their distaste of your constant vandalism below. HawkerTyphoon 13:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Agreed. David L Rattigan 14:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. In fact I put a Requests for investigation on this guy a few days ago, but it's a page that appears to get fairly slow responses --Robdurbar 14:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I have blocked you indefinitely for continuing to vandalise after several attempts to get you to stop. I will put my block up for review on WP:ANI with the recommendation that you be considered indefinitely banned per exhausted community patience. --Sam Blanning(talk) 14:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

ok i wont vandal anymore
ok i get the message [Unsigned comment by User:Shweeny666]
 * No, you clearly don't. You have been given temporary bans several times as a warning to stop vandalising, and each time access is restored you continue relentlessly with vandalism and disruption. David L Rattigan 21:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I am sorry Shweeny, but perhaps Wikipedia is not for you. You are welcome to take your viewpoints elsewhere, but Wikipedia is not, and never will be a place for political wrangling. It's a shame that you haven't embraced the WP spirit. HawkerTyphoon 22:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

some BNP edits were so good they are still in the main article right now


 * I'm not about to be drawn into a debate about this. Some edits you made were helpful. 99% weren't. HawkerTyphoon 22:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

more like 60-40


 * Good work. HawkerTyphoon 12:59, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Any reason for the unblock? Admins, I am loathe to let this person back into the fray without a damned good reason HawkerTyphoon
 * I'll second that. David L Rattigan 20:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

it expires in a day or two

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Ipblocklist

Unblock request
Shweeny666, by continually reverting the admin by replacing the unblock request when it has been removed twice (which means you won't be unblocked), you are already showing that your promise to stop being disruptive is disingenuous. David L Rattigan 18:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * My apologies, you are right - my bad. It was me the second time, because it had already been removed once by an admin. David L Rattigan 18:45, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No, it was you the THRID time, I removed it twice. And I am an admin. The block was discussed and consensus is that it stays. The user continually putting an unblock template up makes me even more firm about that. pschemp | talk 21:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

i spoke to one of the moderators, he says it will take two weeks


 * And which m,oderator would that be? His input on this talk page would be wonderfully helpful. Perhaps we could show him some of your edits? HawkerTyphoon 23:19, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

ok, it will get undone, ill email a few more admins


 * OK, Good luck with that, kiddo:P. Seriously, if you have some good edits to make, post them on here, and if they're good we can put them in, but I doubt seriosuly that anyone will unblock you. HawkerTyphoon 01:28, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Mobile_phone_picture_Chips.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mobile_phone_picture_Chips.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jusjih 03:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)