User talk:Shworks999

May 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Madhura Raja; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 16:23, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent editing history at Madhura Raja shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. bonadea contributions talk 16:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

They are making false datas about the collection .. AJMAL SHAH S (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

This is just can't be acceptable...some one editing this with some hidden agendas...for promoting fake collection...plz help Shworks999 (talk) 18:18, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your editing
Thanks for your editing. some big teams are behind this inorder to reduce the collection report AJMAL SHAH S (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 17:54, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 18:17, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Block
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violating the 3 revert rule and for introducing less-than reliable data (which you failed to try to address on the article talk page). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 18:29, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Unblock
Shworks999, you were warned twice about the bright-line three reverts rule, but you kept reverting well past three times. And in fact the other editor who violated the edit warring policy has also been blocked. --bonadea contributions talk 18:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

H
Hi Shworks999 (talk) 17:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Unblock
may I know how many days it takes to avoid my block Shworks999 (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2019 (UTC)