User talk:Shyam/Archive13


 * Archive upto February 2006
 * Archive 1-15 March 2006
 * Archive 16-31 March 2006
 * Archive April 2006
 * Archive May-September 2006
 * Archive 1 October-15 November 2006
 * Archive 16 November-31 December 2006
 * Archive January 2007
 * Archive February 2007
 * Archive March-August 2007
 * Archive September-December 2007
 * Archive January-March 2008

Portal:Norway
I responded to your comment at the WP:FPORTC discussion page. Thanks for taking a look at the portal, Cirt (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * FYI, I changed that title/subsection heading at Portal:Oregon, per your suggestion, as well. Cirt (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks Cirt!! Shyam  ( T / C ) 05:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

HELP! Need Hindi translations
I've been working a little on the Indian Space Research Organisation page, and noticed that the name is not given in Hindi (or any other Indian language for that matter). While I understand that English is the de-facto language of Indian science, I think it important that ISRO's name be translated into Hindi in the opening sentence of that article. I do not speak a word of Hindi (though I hope to rectify that after I complete my studies in Arabic and Mandarin Chinese), but this bugs me to no end (especially considering the Devanagari abbreviation in the logo). Could you kindly translate "Indian Space Research Organisation" into Hindi, with the Hindi abbreviation and a suitable (e.g. IAST) transliteration? Thank you! Lockesdonkey (talk) 04:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Usurpation request
Hi Mpradeep, this is Usurpation request for Shyam on tewp. I have unified login with name "Shyam". Someone else has created with accountname "Shyam" before and have no contributions. Can this username be usurped with some other name, so that I can have same name on tewp as well. This will be a great help. Regards, Shyam  ( T / C ) 09:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * ✅ Hi Shyam, Your request has been considered, now you can unify your login account on tewp. __Mpradeep (talk) 10:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Portal:Anglicanism
You wrote: "Articles should be of good quality. There are some articles, which do not qualify to be selected, like, Old St Paul's Cathedral, St Thomas the Martyr's Church, Oxford."

Both of those articles have passed GA. A good article is called a good article because by definition it has been reviewed and has been determined to be of good quality. Why on earth would you claim they dont qualify for the portal? You also never addressed my response to your first comments. -- Secisek (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Image licensing
Hi, why did you added cc-by-sa-2.5 on ? Did you contacted the author of image? If you contacted the author of image and the author agrees to license under cc-by-sa-2.5 you must add this information on image description. Cheers. Carlosguitar (Yes Executor?) 12:02, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Carlosguitar, I was new to Wikipedia at that time. I misinterpreted the author's quote. It can go for speedy-deletion. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thanks for making me aware of the incident. Regards, Shyam  ( T / C ) 12:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:34, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Phalguna Mela in Khatushyamji
Hi. I've attempted to edit the above article down to source-able, encyclopedic information. I'd love you to find sources for some of the stuff I've pulled out, though, and you seem to be the main contributor to the article...--Shannonr (talk) 13:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Shannonr, the source mentioned by you has informATION from the Wikipedia page. The information provided is true, but sometimes it is hard to find online sources to verify the information. If I came across any related sources to verify, then I will add them to the Wikipedia page. I am going to revert the page, edited by you. Thanks, Shyam  ( T / C ) 10:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that to be "encyclopedic", information has to jump a number of bars. One of those bars is, clearly, notability. One of the ways to judge the notability of information is the ease of which one finds references to it. By your own assessment, this festival simply does not meet that requirement. I tried to edit it down to simply "the notable" -- but you disagree. That's your prerogative. By anyone's assessment of the basic rules of English grammar, the article is also severely deficient. And again, I tried to whip it into shape. But clearly this is just "your word against mine" -- so I'm not going to be a dick about it. If you think the article represents what Wikipedia is all about, then, respectfully, I must disagree, but I'm not going to edit war you on it! I'm here to make improvements, not to fight pointless battles about what is and isn't notable. Best of luck to you! --Shannonr (talk) 10:42, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

India Politics Project: Maharashtra
Hello, I have created pages for all Lok Sabha constituencies in Maharashtra which were absent before and added info about MPs. Could you pls take a look for completeness? Salilb (talk) 11:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject India Newsletter Volume III, Issue no. 001 - June 2008
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 06:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

LS Constituency lowercase
Hi, I have created several articles on Lok Sabha constituencies. You have created stubs for most MPs of the 14th LS with links to the constituency. However the links for most are incorrect because of the uppercase (Constituency) as compared to the lowercase used for the article (constituency). Could you pls check/recorrect the links in your articles? Perhaps you could use a bot? Salilb (talk) 09:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Salilb, these days, I am less active. Will you please have a look over it, if possible? Most of the contributions regarding this come around September 25, 2006. Thanks much, Shyam  ( T / C ) 10:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:IPOTDArchiveFooter
A tag has been placed on Template:IPOTDArchiveFooter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rupatai Diliprao Nilangekar Patil
A tag has been placed on Rupatai Diliprao Nilangekar Patil requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Joseosoria (talk) 12:13, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:23, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Mayank Tehlan, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Mayank Tehlan appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Mayank Tehlan has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Mayank Tehlan and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Mayank Tehlan with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Mayank Tehlan.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 00:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Dal Lake.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Dal Lake.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 06:05, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:EdiculePorteDauphine.jpg
Hello! Could you please restore this image, which you had deleted with the mention "available on Commons" :. Because actually it is not available on Commons anymore. Thanks in advance for your help. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Shyam  ( T / C ) 09:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Mediation requested at Jerusalem
Hello Shyam, Hope you're well. Having trouble over at Jeruslem, as is often the case. In particular, I have raised the issue that the history headings have recently been reflecting a purely Israeli POV to the exclusion to the Palestinian POV on the matter. It 'began' with multiple deletions of historical facts of concern to Palestinians. But I won't deal with that here. The main issue is the title of a heading under the history section, which has been altered to read: "1967 War and unification" and the discussion of the matter is here. I am happy with "1967 War" or "1967 War, unification, and annexation of East Jerusalem." However, the term "unification" in the absence of "annexation" biases the heading towards exclusively Israeli POV. However, I have recently been the main person arguing this point of view (one arguing the same point as myself has left wikipedia due to incivility, and the Palestinian editors seem to have fled after a recent FA review lacking any resolution yet de-tagged nevertheless). 2 or 3 of the other pro-Zionist editors on the page (I am myself Israeli) have changed the heading repeatedly to "1967- Unification" or, "Division and Unification." I do not dispute that the city was unified, but am arguing that in isolation, the term 'unified' in this case has political ramifications which deny the annexation aspect of the unification. I feel that if the title is to read "unification" it should also read "annexation" so as to represent both Israeli and Palestinian POVs, otherwise, the title most preferred on my end is a politically neutral one, simply, "1967 War." This simple heading is all that is really needed to help orient the uninitated reader to the chronology and allow them to sort out the significance of the event for themselves. I made a similar argument above, re: calling the "1948 War" the "War of Independence." Please excuse the length of this message, I have never requested mediation before and I thought I'd help orient you as much as I can a complex dispute as best I can, before you visit the links further! Thanks for any help you can render. Best, LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 04:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Could you visit my talkpage when you get a chance, just so that I know what you think of playing a role as mediator in this matter? If you're not willing I'd like to bring someone else in. Thanks much, LamaLoLeshLa (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:19, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sourabh Bandekar
A tag has been placed on Sourabh Bandekar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 21:35, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 05:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:56, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:All India Minorities Front/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:All India Minorities Front/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:All India Trinamool Congress/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:All India Trinamool Congress/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:All Kerala M.G.R. Dravida Munnetra Party/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:All Kerala M.G.R. Dravida Munnetra Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Ambedkar Samaj Party/meta/color
A tag has been placed on Template:Ambedkar Samaj Party/meta/color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Ambedkarist Republican Party/meta/color
A tag has been placed on Template:Ambedkarist Republican Party/meta/color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Awami Party/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Awami Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bahujan Kisan Dal/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Bahujan Kisan Dal/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bharat Ki Lok Jimmedar Party/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Bharat Ki Lok Jimmedar Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bharatiya Backward Party/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Bharatiya Backward Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bharatiya Janvadi Party/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Bharatiya Janvadi Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bharatiya Labour Party/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Bharatiya Labour Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bharatiya Lok Kalyan Dal/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Bharatiya Lok Kalyan Dal/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:39, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bharatiya Muhabbat Party (All India)/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Bharatiya Muhabbat Party (All India)/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bharatiya Prajatantrik Shudh Gandhiwadi Krishak Dal/meta/color
A tag has been placed on Template:Bharatiya Prajatantrik Shudh Gandhiwadi Krishak Dal/meta/color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Bharatiya Sarvkalayan Kranti Dal/meta/color
A tag has been placed on Template:Bharatiya Sarvkalayan Kranti Dal/meta/color requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Biju Janata Dal/meta/shortname
A tag has been placed on Template:Biju Janata Dal/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)