User talk:Shyam Pandit

February 2017
Hello, I'm RileyBugz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jangid, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RileyBugz Yell at me &#124; Edits  20:56, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jangid. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RileyBugz Yell at me &#124; Edits  17:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

March 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jangid, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Please, do not add unsourced content. Also, I would advise you to not edit the Jangid article, as you seem to have a conflict of interest.'' RileyBugz Yell at me  &#124; Edits  23:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Jangid. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. RileyBugz Yell at me &#124; Edits  16:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:37, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 19:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)