User talk:Shyamravichand

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Thuppakki. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Theri (film)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Theri (film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 06:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vijay (actor), you may be blocked from editing. You have just come off a block for exactly the same thing, and you think it wise to immediately recommence that behaviour? Muffled Pocketed  15:02, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Sri Divya image
Hi, I have left you a note at Commons regarding File:Sridivya.jpg but will ask the same question here just in case you don't go back to Commons. Could you please tell me when, where and how you obtained that image? It looks to me like it might be a still from a movie. - Sitush (talk) 20:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 23:34, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Blogs as references
Some of the content you added in these edits (specifically the subject's height information) were supported by blogs. We do not use blogs as references, because anyone with an internet connection can start a blog and call himself an expert on any subject. Stick to mainstream published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. This would be sites like The Hindu, Indian Express, Times of India, or other sources indicated at WP:ICTF. Note that in consideration of your previous blocks for questionable edits, you're going to have to get up to speed really quickly on this, because if you add any more blogs to support content, your account will be blocked again. Biographies of living people must be impeccably sourced. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:29, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Two other issues:
 * 1) Genres are subjective labels, so you need to provide references when you change or add genres as you did here. One man's Thriller is another man's Suspense.
 * 2) Film ratings are not inherently noteworthy, and are not universally understood. A person in Denmark is not going to know what India's U certificate is, and we write for a global readership, not just for Indian people. Please refrain from indiscriminately adding ratings information unless you're willing/capable of providing sufficient context of what the rating means, and why we should care about the rating. WP:FILMRATING goes into detail to explain the type of content that is appropriate. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC) This block is for these edits where you deliberately introduce false information, inflating the star ratings of several reviews. Hindustan Times did not rate the film 3/5, Behindwoods did not rate the film 3.75/5, The Indian Express did not rate the film 3.75/5,. Dishonest editing and promotional activities will not be tolerated here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:46, 24 June 2016 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)