User talk:Sibbs11

Help me!
Hi , please help me to remove the contents where some irrelevant castes are listed in the Mahto Communities. This is updated false as Mahto does not belong to Chamar,Dhobi or disad,beldar..All are falsly updated by the user name called Utcursch. He is misusing the admin rights. Even I tried to make him understand multiple times but he is totally against me and that is intentionally done by him I request you to please remove the castes contents from this community as you are defaming this community intentionally.

This is globally published and I don't want to see any false contents under this communities. This is tatally inhumanity who just do this for the sake of taking revenge and misusing the admin rights. I request Wikipedia to please remove his admin rights as he playing with communities and he does not belong to and truth authentic contents. How can he relates the link with Mahto Community you idiot.

Please help me with...

hi .. there is wrong information about Mahto sir name. This sir name does not belong to caste dushadh,gwala dhobi.

Please remove that like....Also the editing part is deactivated and blocked it turns no one can update the correct information.

some one played withthe Mahto community to defame.Please look into this matter sereously and take action against those who published wrong information in the global article. Sibbs11 (talk) 18:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * You are already receiving help on IRC so please don't add this here. Thanks, Tom29739 [ talk ] 19:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC).

I did not get any help..They are not taking my request and they deliberately intended to defame this community by not removing castes line.

Hi ..Please enable the edit button .. admin user name Utcursch.Playing with the contents on the topic 'Mahto' Where he has deliberately added some irrelavent contents which does not belongs to Mahto Community. Contents like caste chamar,dushad,yadav. and many other castes are added to defame this community. please take my complain against him to put such contents in this topic and request you to revoke the permission from him. I have edited some contents last year and added some relevant contents but he took it in negative sense and playing with this community to defame. Please request you to delete the castes listed as these castes are not belongs to Mahto community except Koiry and Bhumihar. Rest all castes are added intentionally by the user Utcursh to defame. I hope your will take it in positive way.

Even I tired to chat with him and trued to make him understand to delete the castes list but he seems more of like taking it as a joke and rigid about it.

Hi .. Who are you to add false contents about this community...where you are all that information that....Mahto sir name is used by chamar,dushad,gawaala....bloody illiterate...who made you admin ....I will lodge complain against you...user- Utchursch.

You are trying to be very smart... Who are you to update this community...Bloody idiot...Will you stop publishing false information about this community...If you dont know right information ..better to disolve this ....you idiot...

Dont u have other work...you keep changing this community articles...dont you focus in any other community...bloody bastards...Why have you made editable disabled.

Change it else will fire a complain against you ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.119.254.173 (talk) 18:13, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mahto without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. utcursch &#124; talk 19:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Mahto, you may be blocked from editing. You've already been warned for similar removals at your IP addresses (111.119.234.75 / 106.194.44.83). utcursch &#124; talk 18:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Mahto. utcursch &#124; talk 19:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)


 * You've already been told not to remove referenced content at User talk:111.119.234.43 and User talk:111.119.234.61. This has also been discussed at IRC, where you sought help. If you have a problem with the content, please discuss it on the article's talk page or seek dispute resolution, instead of blanking well-sourced content. utcursch &#124; talk 19:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

I have already discussed several times. Ultimately i have to take this step to remove the irrelevant contents. Please don't come in between and add irrelevant articles under this topic. I will request the wiki management to revoke you from the admin access. As you are not here to listen any ones voice and just to fight with the words with zero knowledge.

I warn you if you try to undo the edited contents I will take this matter to the higher authorities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sibbs11 (talk • contribs)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Sibbs11.The discussion is about the topic Mahto. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 21:55, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mahto. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 18:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Blocked for a week
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Mahto. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Euryalus (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. I've blocked this account for a week to prevent the continued disruption of the Mahto article. This includes edit-warring to maintain your preferred version, and blanking of sourced material. For what it's worth, some of your comments on your usertalk page are personal attacks. You are welcome to return to editing when the the block expires. However, please note that Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and article edits require reliable sources. Should you disagree with this block, the appeal mechanisms are outlined in the template above. -- Euryalus (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Mahto, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. utcursch &#124; talk 21:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing on the article Mahto. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. utcursch &#124; talk 17:27, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with...

Sibbs11 (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Hi ..Please enable the edit button .. admin user name Utcursch.Playing with the contents on the topic 'Mahto' Where he has deliberately added some irrelavent contents which does not belongs to Mahto Community. Contents like caste chamar,dushad,yadav. and many other castes are added to defame this community. please take my complain against him to put such contents in this topic and request you to revoke the permission from him. I have edited some contents last year and added some relevant contents but he took it in negative sense and playing with this community to defame. Please request you to delete the castes listed as these castes are not belongs to Mahto community except Koiry and Bhumihar. Rest all castes are added intentionally by the user Utcursh to defame. I hope your will take it in positive way.

Even I tired to chat with him and trued to make him understand to delete the castes list but he seems more of like taking it as a joke and rigid about it.


 * You were blocked for edit-warring and other disruptive editing. Instead of accepting that you were blocked to prevent such disruptive editing, you tried to get round the block by using a sockpuppet, so the block length was increased. When the block was over, you continued to the same kind of disruptive editing, so you were blocked indefinitely. You then try to get round the block by asking for another editor to make the edits you want on your behalf, and also make absurd accusations against the administrator who placed the latest block. If you continue to try to use talk page access to get someone else to help you evade the effects of your block, you can expect to have talk page access removed. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)