User talk:Sickofdoublestandards

Off-topic commentary
I have removed a comment of yours in Urodynamics because it was commentary and not factual material. If you want to include something along those lines in the article (and it seems a little off-topic), then it would need to be referenced to a reliable source that says that. I also note that your edits to that article have been removed multiple times. You should be aware of the three revert rule - if you revert to your version 3 times in a day, that is too many - you should be discussing matters on the article's talk page, not "edit warring". Your account can be blocked for violation of the 3 Revert Rule.Brianyoumans (talk) 19:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Brianyoumans (talk) 01:32, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * There is considerable evidence in the UK that men are refraining from having Urodynamics because they are being forced to accept all female teams for this most personal and embarrassing test. However, due to the mind police and politically correct brigade, much of this evidence is surpressed. Why are you so opposed to the issue at least being flagged?
 * You could certainly include something about this, perhaps a bit more neutrally worded, if you include a reference - perhaps to a news article, preferably to an actual scientific or medical study on this problem. Brianyoumans (talk) 17:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Urodynamics. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 14:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, please take note of this. If you continue edit-warring in this manner at Urodynamics, you'll be blocked. Please make use of reliable sources, discuss matters on the talk page and avoid such repetitive revert-warring. Deacon of Pndapetzim ( Talk ) 14:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Urodynamics
The material that you have been adding to Urodynamics represents your own perosnal opinion. This material should only be reinserted with the required reliable and verifiable sources from newspapers or magazines to support the claims you have been making. Alansohn (talk) 17:30, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.