User talk:Siddiqsazzad001/Archive 8

Regarding AA Films
Can you help me understand why the content I have added was reverted. It was unbiased and value added content I have added to the page. Can you please explain the reason for the revert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrajimba (talk • contribs) 14:24, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, first of all instafinancials.com is not a reliable source. Please see: WP:CITE. Why we care about their CIN? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a Financial Statemented website. Siddiqsazzad001       14:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

GreenCat3
Hi! I´m sorry for vandelizing..

JK! Bye! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GreenCat3 (talk • contribs) 16:41, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


 * You should be concerned about your talk page warns. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks. Siddiqsazzad001   '''  17:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Siddiqsazzad001. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance. so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

Sorry!
I’m really sorry I made fun of Wikipedia in front of your nose. Instead of, I’m sorry about what happened back there. I will never do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.0.5.228 (talk) 08:48, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:1967–68 Sussex County Football League
Hi there,

What needs to be done to put this page back into mainstream? EddersGTI (talk) 23:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, put this  at the top of the article. If the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, then a AfC reviewer will help you to move the draft article to mainspace. Thank You,  Siddiqsazzad001   '''  05:01, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 08:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Regards Draft:The Voice (India season 3)
Sir,I respect you and all the seniors of Wikipedia.I Want to know wgat can I do so as to I can make this draft page into mainpage.Please provide me all neccesary details so as to I can improve Wikipedia Thanks Bhanwar singh Bhanwar singh vaish (talk) 14:09, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

(Sir, I respect you and all the seniors of Wikipedia. I Want to know what can I do so as to I can make this draft page into the main page. Please provide me all necessary details so as to I can improve Wikipedia) - Fixed by Siddiqsazzad001


 * Wow! Finally, long time later you respond. Look "auditiondate.in" is not a reliable source. Add some categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. Add more independent sources. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, put this  at the top of the article. I noticed that you didn't follow the rule of spacing with punctuation. Punctuation means commas, semicolons, colons, exclamation points, question marks, and quotation marks. The space needed after these punctuation marks.  Siddiqsazzad001   '''  14:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Page Complete
Sir I have completed my page name i had told you earlier on previous talk. please see the page and make it to mainpage by giving your feedback to me first. Thank You. Bhanwar singh vaish (talk) 14:59, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Nope! Not yet. Please see my Comment . Also the article meets not Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Wait few weeks or more, AfC reviewer will help you to move the draft article to mainspace, if article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please see Notability. Thank You, Siddiqsazzad001   '''  15:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

I have fixed your concern of unknown parameters please see and comment on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhanwar singh vaish (talk) 15:50, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * What about "auditiondate.in" and "endemolindia.com" (404 Not Found error)? Thank You, Siddiqsazzad001   '''  15:57, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

I have fixed what you said.Now again give your feedback — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhanwar singh vaish (talk) 16:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Please follow the comment of  and  .  Siddiqsazzad001   '''  20:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of My Love from the Star
The article My Love from the Star you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:My Love from the Star for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Siddiqsazzad001 -- Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 20:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Water town (China)
This is my first experience of an article being "moved to draftspace"... There are thousands of web pages in which this term is used, as you may confirm by googling '"water town" china'. It is also already used on Wikipedia itself perhaps ten times; I had wikified three of those.

However, although it is clearly a common term for something real, I did not locate an exact definition of the term. I was hoping that someone more knowledgeable about China would notice it among the China stubs, and improve it. So what would you suggest that I do? I can add five, ten, fifty more external links in which the phrase is used. I can quote some of those articles. But is that really necessary? Mporter (talk) 07:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * A stub is an article that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject but if a stub has little verifiable information, or if its subject has no apparent notability, it may be deleted or be merged into another relevant article. Sizable articles are usually not considered stubs, even if they have significant problems. Thank You, Siddiqsazzad001   '''  07:56, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Going to create The Voice India season 3 page by preventing all warnings
sir I am going to create the page without any discrimination on any relevant source and I am knowing that this is very important to improve that site and that page so as to our website gives the true information to all the people of the world I am going to create the pH of the voice India season 3 immediately without any fear thank you have a nice day Bhanwar singh vaish (talk) 15:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * You may be blocked from editing. :-) Siddiqsazzad001   '''  15:55, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Will you please handle this case? He again created The Voice (India) Season 3. Report at WP:ANI, is a better way. Siddiqsazzad001   '''  16:02, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've taken a slightly different tack for now but if he makes one more "blunder" I will happily take it to ANI. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Google News
In this edit you claimed to be searching Google News, but you were in fact doing a plain old Google web search, which is pretty useless for any topic in determining notability. A real Google News search finds loads of reliable sources. Please distinguish between useless and useful searches in the future, and don't lie about which one you have done. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I didn't use quotation marks, it doesn't mean plain old Google web search or I am telling lies. It should be proposed deletion for that period. Siddiqsazzad001   '''  08:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * It's nothing to do with quotation marks. Your search very clearly was a web search rather than a news search, which can be seen by simply pasting it into a browser and pressing enter, so there's no point in your continuing to lie about it. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Please see and . In addition to using this operator to search for an exact phrase, you can now add quotation marks around a single word to tell Google to match that word precisely. So, if in the past you would have searched for [ magazine +latina ], you should now search for [ magazine "latina" ]. Please see  and .  :-)  Siddiqsazzad001   '''  09:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know about quotation marks, but the point is that your search, whether it had quotation marks or not, was not a Google News search. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Maybe I noted wrong link in the edit summary. Don't pull this discussion long with the major issue. Also I need your clarification here. :) Siddiqsazzad001   '''  10:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 4
 News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (March 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the fourth issue of the new Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
 * Cscr-featured.svg Joeytje50's JWB


 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg PAC2: Chouette* Just A Click Away
 * DannyS712: FPC voter* Easy-link
 * Zackmann08's unwatch deleted* Begoon's addUploadsLink
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Pythoncoder's voteSymbols (now in release 3.0.3)* Evad37's rater (now in release 1.2.0)


 * Farm-Fresh error go.png Abelmoschus Esculentus retired from Wikipedia; DannyS712 is now maintaining their scripts:
 * Ajax Rollback* Ajax Rollback with summary* Contributions Search* Tags Manager Teahouse Talkback* Mass Category Modifying Helper* EFFP Response Helper Skip to bottom* Source Assess Table Generator* Userspace* RandomAfC Mass Message Sender* Discussion Closer
 * FR30799386 was blocked from Wikipedia; DannyS712 is now maintaining their scripts:
 * communicator* copyvio-check* Undo* Quick-undo* Readonly* Redirectify* Section-strike

Pending requests
 * A request for helping with help requests
 * Hyphenating ISBNs
 * ...and many more, all available at User scripts/Requests



Miscellaneous
 * The Wikimedia Foundation has requested help with the testing of and feedback on a new tool for "Automated article section recommendations" for stub articles. See the village pump notice for more.
 * has been added to, closing a feature request from 2010. It allows users to load a script via URL (like  ) and specify a callback function (like  ). See ResourceLoader/Core modules for more.

Enjoy your April Fool's, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

About the newsletter

Subscription options

Discuss this issue

The Signpost: 31 March 2019
 News, reports and features from the English Wikipedia's weekly journal about Wikipedia and Wikimedia <div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 15:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * From the editors: Getting serious about humor
 * News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
 * In the media: Women's history month
 * Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
 * Featured content: Out of this world
 * Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
 * Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
 * Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
 * News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
 * Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
 * From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
 * Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
 * Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
 * In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
 * Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
 * Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings

Your refund request at the Interface administrators' noticeboard
Hi Siddiqsazzad001! I saw your refund request at ANINT and wanted to follow up. :-) I noticed that you had requested deletion of your common.css page, but didn't request an undeletion of it in your refund request. In case this is what you meant to do, I went ahead and restored it for you but commented out the lines of code that were present in the file so that you could review them and make sure that this wasn't something you also needed. If it is, great; just remove the code comments and enjoy! :-) If not, just leave a message on my user talk page and let me know - I'll be happy to delete it for you if that is what you wish. I just wanted to make sure that you had the opportunity to look through that file and make sure that you weren't missing any code that you wanted to keep. :-) Cheers -  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 5
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#606060; background-color:#f8f8f8; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks"> News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2019). Hello everyone and welcome to the 5th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Scripts Submit your new/improved script here
 * Cscr-featured.svg The Evil IP address' Heading Editor


 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Newslinger's Notifier* Suffusion of Yellow's View Source
 * BrandonXLF: To Top Button* Restorer* Easy Summary* Subpage Mover


 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Evad37: Xunlink (v2.0.0, handles portals)* XFDcloser (v3.13.0, upgrades at TfD and removal of backlinks, minor tweaks and fixes)
 * Twinkle (commit 26305a2, major updates to csd, xfd, and tag menus, additional improvements to other smaller features)


 * Farm-Fresh error go.png DannyS712 is now maintaining Visual editing, a fork of Flooded with them hundreds' VisualEditist script

Pending requests
 * Twinkle for mobile
 * Working with "psuedo-headings"
 * ...and many more, all available at User scripts/Requests



Until next month, --DannyS712 (talk) 00:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

About the newsletter

Subscription options

Discuss this issue

Wilhelm Schlag page
Hi Siddiqsazzad001, I am following up on the page for Wilhelm Schlag that you declined. You stated that more outside sources are needed. But I think that he satisfies #5 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) He was Livingston Professor at University of Chicago, a named chair position, as verified at the https://fas.yale.edu/book/new-faculty-2018-19/science/wilhelm-schlag web page that he does not control. Please let me know if I misunderstood the criteria, but I thought Notability of Academics guideline is pretty clear. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smyy2324 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Siddiqsazzad001, this article subject clearly passes both WP:PROF as explained above and WP:PROF with many citations to his published papers as listed here. I would advise you to revert your decline here. WP:PROF is different from many other notability guidelines in that it is explicitly an alternative to the general notability guideline rather than advice about whether a subject is likely to pass that guideline. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * My decline reason is for WP:BIO. There are lack of sources. If you think that this is my mistake, then you can resubmit it. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 06:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of K-391 (music producer)


A tag has been placed on K-391 (music producer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  00:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


 * See this . Take to RfD if redirect is felt to be inappropriate. Siddiqsazzad001 (talk) 12:15, 5 May 2019 (UTC)