User talk:Sidwms

Sidwms (talk) 23:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Sidwms (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC) I have presented only historical facts. The press has been covering up these historical facts. The "Trinity United Church of Christ" in Chicago, has published these statements. And who is "Rob" to stiffle free speech and truth? sidwms

Speedy deletion of The Press covering Barack Obama's racism
A tag has been placed on The Press covering Barack Obama's racism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rnb (talk) 20:34, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I am a servant of the Livng God. All of my comments are supported by ALL ENCYCLOPEDIAS, and many other sources of which three have been named. You cannot change history by lying about it. Even the Oxford Dictionary of the Popes has recorded the story about Pope Pius IX becoming, "the Prisoner of the Vatican," and being, "run out of Rome." If my post does not make sense to you, you are deficient in English reading comprehension, for I am also a "grammarian," and everything is stated logically, and grammaticaally correct.

A tag has been placed on Age of enlightenmeny; thousand years, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bearian (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I am a historian of Bible commentaries. None of them have ever known what the "7 Spirits of God" are. Many of them have denied the "7 Spirits of God" by falsely interpreting, "One God" (Eph 4.6). After being led by the Spirit of God to the knowledge of the "7 Spirits of God" I surfed the web and found 2 or 3 sites with only a minimal portion of my knowledge on the subject. If you claim copyright violations, you shoud name the copyright. Ths web site was stated to be interested in "references"; but this is the thrd time I have been opposed without any "reference" or "reason" or "common sense." Why is all of this censorship being directed at me? Please respond.

Speedy deletion of 7 Spirits of God
A tag has been placed on 7 Spirits of God requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (EhJJ)TALK 00:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Names of God
The names of God are "fixed" by God. One is either for "them" or against "them"; but no one can be "neutral" on the subject. sidwmsSidwms (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 01:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

hangon I am "Seven Lamps Library; Sid Williams." My books have been copyrighted by the Library of Congress in 2007. All of your excuases to delete me have proven to be groundless, as this one is. What are you afraid of? A little truth never hurt anyone! sidwms Sidwms (talk) 22:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I have mis-explained myself my previous comment. Your edit was removed because it appears to be hitherto unpublished information. We can only include information from God-fearing published sources. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 01:45, 3 April 2008 (UTC)