User talk:Sievert 81

Welcome!
Hi Sievert 81! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Vsmith (talk) 23:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Always support any content additions with WP:Reliable sources. Vsmith (talk) 23:45, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
So I’m responsible for the actions of others? Is there anything I can do to prove this? If you notice, all of my edits are not vandalism. I would only seek to make constructive edits. I would suggest an IP block of the involved IPs and an exemption for this account as a solution.

Checkuser note

 * ✅ socking via User:Prionopathy.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Unblock
I just don’t understand Sievert 81 (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Don't you think it's a little odd from our perspective that an hour after you unblock request was declined, a new user shows up on your IP address who is also interested in reverting vandalism through RedWarn? only (talk) 23:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, that was my sock and my fault, I thought if I proved I wasn’t a vandal I would be unblocked. Stupid mistake on my part. Sievert 81 (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC) @Only

User:Only Sievert 81 (talk) 23:46, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

None of the other garbage that was popping up was mine. The only sockpuppet i made was prionopathy Sievert 81 (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

So is there any way to get unblocked? Can you just answer that? Sievert 81 (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Likely not now. Your "I wouldn't dare sock!" protest followed by "Well, except that one" doesn't sit well for us.  Your best bet is to take the standard offer.  That means go at least 6 months without socking and then come back to request unblock at that point.  No guarantees you'll have it accepted, of course.  But it definitely won't be accepted anytime soon.  only (talk) 01:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. only (talk) 21:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Proposed community ban of Sievert 81. Thank you. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 00:16, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

In case you can still read this...
You were not blocked for no reason; you were blocked by a CheckUser for suspected sockpuppetry. --JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Sievert 81. Thank you.