User talk:SigdelVinay

August 2013
Hello, I'm Insulam Simia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Insulam Simia (talk) 07:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Pulchowk campus
I believe that one of your recent contributions is considered an opinion AND/OR has substantial grammatical, formatting and/or spelling errors (this is a general notification message) and have, thus, reverted it. If you feel that this was done in error, please do not hesitate to contact me, and happy editing! Jackson Peebles (talk) 06:06, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sigdel


A tag has been placed on Sigdel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alexf(talk) 17:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I note your request on my talk page for undeletion on this article. I regret to say that in my opinion the article is not about a notable topic, and I therefore will not restore it. You have the option of lodging an appeal at the deletion review page. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:10, 27 August 2013 (UTC)