User talk:Sigehelmus/Archive 1

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Sigehelmus! Thank you for your contributions. I am Anupam and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! AnupamTalk 21:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This edit summary is completely inappropriate per WP:NPA and WP:AGF Montanabw (talk)  21:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Allegra Versace
If you want to, you can take a look at the article about Allegra Versace. That article is this weeks TAFI.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I'll certainly try...--Sige &#124;д･) 01:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Augustine of Canterbury
Is it me...(often is) or should that say 7th century? Eagleash (talk) 02:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I know it's awkward, but apparently anything I change is controversial when I'm trying to correct to the MOS.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you mean by that. 604 is 7th century, not 6th; as 2004 is (was) 21st century. Eagleash (talk) 02:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Please change it to whatever you want, and add AD if you agree it is needed.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * (ec) but the 6th century is referring to his birthdate, not his death date (which is 604). So, yes, 6th century is correct, as he died in the 7th century. And per WP:ERA we do NOT need to put AD there. Ealdgyth - Talk 02:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Please explain, especially the latter. What is wrong with AD? This is not an article on quantum physics (and even then CE is often loathed by those not seeking to spread the minority). Do you expect, for example, a Hindu immigrant eho recently learned English and has maybe seen one or two Christians in his life to know offhand what era is being explained?--Sige &#124;д･) 02:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no need to use either AD or CE when the date is not ambiguous. See WP:ERA. And we don't italicize quotes (see MOS:NOITALQUOTE). Ealdgyth - Talk 02:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * "ambiguous" is subjective, as a general rule of thumb most laypeople would get confused with pre-Renaissance historical figures. I provided a real-life example even. You are being ignorant of the very diverse ranges of peoples who use the Project. Not everyone knows (or really cares sadly) that Augustine and Plato lived in different times.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, wording was not clear to me at this time of night. Done way too many edits today I think... Eagleash (talk) 02:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:ERA states "do not use CE or AD unless required to avoid ambiguity (e.g. The Norman Conquest took place in 1066 not 1066 CE nor AD 1066)." This example applies directly to all three pages the user has added AD to. The user continues to disregard MoS policies and respond with edit warring rather than discussion. It has really become quite disruptive. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 02:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I have already discussed here and sent you a message on your talk page. Your use of "The user", by the way, is not being WP:CIVIL.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The user is attempting to diffuse the discussion by spreading it my talk page (moved to section below. More disruption, and further disregard of the MoS. The example I cited, quoting from the policy, applies directly to your edits. If you with to argue with the WP:ERA policy, do it at that page. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 02:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Your use of "The user", by the way, is not being WP:CIVIL. Correct this behavior or do not bother me.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This user, is refusing to see articles of the related nature (e.g. saints' articles) primarily contain AD in toto used at least once in the first date of article for the reason of avoiding ambiguity. See WP:BIAS.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:ERA
{moved from my talk page here, to consolidate discussion where it began}

If you think you are right, I have a little surprise for you: You have a TON of articles to edit "AD" out of. The burden is on you to explain to the community of the Project why you are misinterpreting WP:ERA so radically. Please read WP:BIAS.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The ambiguity in question in regard to this policy is whether the dates could be confused between AD or BC. When the dates are consecutive, there is no ambiguity.  Do not be obtuse. And please keep this discussion on your user page, where it originated, rather than hiding these remarks from other participants here. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 02:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I am not being obtuse. You are being obtuse. Not everyone knows what AD or BP or AD or ABC or 123 mean. Not everyone is a Christian or historian. The Early Middle Ages are a topic most laypeople are not familiar with. You are twisting the purpose of WP:ERA; the purpose is to prevent, say, "John Smith was born in 1980 AD". How can you not see this? Look at other articles and WP:BIAS again.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This user, is refusing to see articles of the related nature (e.g. saints' articles) primarily contain AD in toto used at least once in the first date of article for the reason of avoiding ambiguity. See WP:BIAS.--Sige &#124;д･) 02:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * It is not a question of Christianity or knowledge of the middle ages, it is simply counting. If we say someone lived from 486 to 510, it is clear we are talking about the common era by the dates. Failing to see that is indeed obtuse.  And if other pages do not properly apply the policy is no reason to misapply it on further pages. At any rate, you clearly do not have consensus for these changes and should self=revert. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 03:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * "it is clear" To who? You are once again ignorant of WP:NOTBLUE and WP:BIAS. The use of AD is Manual-abiding, thematically and organizationally-consistent, non-intrusive, and overall serves no purpose other than clarification for the lless fortunate. See WP:IAR, especially since AD is only being used, note, ONCE. The use of AD only benefits the Project and provides no harm in any conceivable way. You are being obtuse. Got a problem? YOU need to take it up with the higher-ups. You have nothing to stand on. Now leave two letters alone.--Sige &#124;д･) 03:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Gobstopper
 * added a link pointing to Gumball


 * Swiss Reformed Church
 * added a link pointing to Canton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Len Wiseman, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DonIago (talk) 20:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

RFD
Hi Sigehelmus, You nominated Gregory VI of Constantinople for deletion at AFD yet it's a redirect so it belongs at WP:RFD so I've closed the AFD as Speedy Keep, Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 02:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

TAFI talk

 * Hello :


 * You are invited to participate in this discussion at the TAFI talk page regarding improving the automation of project processes and management of the project. Your input is appreciated.

Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on

Looking for a block?
Seriously, if you keep this up, you're going to get blocked. It's all cited—claiming OR is just going to get you laughed at. The onus is on you to demonstrate to us all that you're not just RIGHTINGGREATWRONGs. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 03:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 02:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Crystal ball
 * added a link pointing to Soothsayer


 * Donald
 * added a link pointing to Scots


 * Saint-Rémy-de-Provence
 * added a link pointing to Remigius

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Tropical Storm Arlene (2017) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tropical Storm Arlene (2017). Since you had some involvement with the Tropical Storm Arlene (2017) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Earwig   talk  00:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Chromium phones home?
Hi, I've read your post The Earwig's talk page. Do you have more information on this? Alakzi (talk) 11:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I see that every time I open the browser settings, it establishes a connection to clients1.google.com; but it's TLS, so I'm probably gonna have to MITM myself to figure out what's going on. It looks like it might be related to RLZ. Alakzi (talk) 12:51, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello ! Thank you for your message. I don't have much off hand right now, but I can direct you to "InstallGentoo Wiki" and check out the articles Chrome and List of web browsers. You can also check out tech news sites concerning Google and their track record of snooping even with Chromium. Ask me if you have any problems!--Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  13:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * That's a handy resource; thanks. Alakzi (talk) 15:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Lead
I offer the following as a bit of guidance, not to fight with you; I hope you will accept it as such. Please review WP:LEAD. The lead is a summary of the body of an article. "Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." Many editors, even many old-timers, make the mistake of developing the lead rather than the body of articles. But this is backward. The body should be developed, then the lead should include a summary. Your edits to Zoe and Irene both included material that is not in the body of the articles. Also, please note that I have edited about 800 articles, mostly in the area of ancient and medieval history. So I'm not following you around; if you edit those pages, they show up on my Watchlist. The same editors show up repeatedly in those areas. It isn't stalking, it is simply sharing common interests. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 13:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message. Sorry about the Zoe edit, I had actually already reverted it as it was intended for Irene. I actually wanted to insert the info also in the body but it is very difficult over mobile. This time I'm actually asking for your help lol--<font face="Helvetica"><small style="font-size:85%;"><font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  14:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Reply:A kitten for you!
Thanks for such a cute kitten! My edition was based on IPA pronunciations from and. The name "CD Projekt" is a blend of English "CD" and Polish "Projekt" (which means simply 'project' in English) and the Polish media read the name of the brand in the way I've written. Sirmann (talk) 16:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Totally forgot about Wiktionary, thank you! You should set up your user pages sometime by the way, and welcome if you're new here.--<font face="Helvetica"><small style="font-size:85%;"><font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  16:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irene of Athens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Schism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

By the way....
I own Elfen Lied, great series but I wish some of the things could have been explained better towards the end. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh my Please no spoilers, I've been saving watching the ending for a special occasion! But that's nice, I hope to get the official DVD one day. Lucy is best.--<font face="Helvetica"><small style="font-size:85%;"><font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  22:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes Lucy is very cute when in her Nya mode lol. I really recommend the anime it is great =) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 22:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Looks like you have some replies: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Being part of the project enables you to better help other editors work together to get anime, and manga related articles up to WP:GA, and WP:FA status. I had you in mind because if you really know a series good, and have the passion to make a good article for it then it really would be a big help. Other than that in the meantime what I do here is fix up the A&M articles, ones that have cleanup issues. I will leave your comment open for other editors to reply over at the project talk-page. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:17, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks just wondering :P I better catch up on my backlog.--<font face="Helvetica"><small style="font-size:85%;"><font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  04:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Bot automation at Wikipedia:Today's articles for improvement
<div style="position:relative; margin:0; background-color:#E2E7FF; border:1px solid blue; padding: 1em; color:#082840"> Greetings WikiProject TAFI members!

Over the past two weeks, there has been extensive discussion on introducing bot automation to assist with maintenance of the Today's Articles for Improvement project. A bot has now been approved for trial and will carry out the weekly duties. The bots first run will occur around 00:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC) (midnight on Sunday).

If you have been assisting any of the weekly maintenance tasks, please refrain from doing so this week. The bot needs to be tested and proven it can do the job, and it only gets one chance per week. The tasks will include:
 * Adding the new scheduled article to Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement and removing the entry from Articles for improvement
 * Set up the schedule pages for the new TAFI, except the adding of an image and caption
 * Adding TAFI to the new article for improvement, remove TAFI from last week's article and add Former TAFI to the talk page
 * Notify relevant WikiProjects that the new TAFI is within their scope
 * Send a mass message to everyone on the notification list of the new TAFI selection

Updating the accomplishments and archiving selections is still done manually, along with daily tasks such as adding approved entries to the articles for improvement page. These will become automated in the near future.

We hope the bot proves to serve well, and by carrying out the routine housekeeping tasks we can boost the overall efficiency and effectiveness of the project. thanks you for your service in helping with the weekly tasks in the past, and for your cooperation during this trial period :)

Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • for all project notifications

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blathmac, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Latinization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Western Pennsylvania English, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intonation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Viscounty of Béarn
Placing three tags atop an article because it "just needs some tidying" is borderline vandalism. Wikipedia isn't finished and neither is this article. Is there a specific issue? Srnec (talk) 16:56, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Méen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Welsh, Cornish and Breton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Three Kingdoms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tocharian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#FF4646; background-color:#F6F0F7; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);;" class="plainlinks">Happy Holidays text.png Hello Sigehelmus: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 08:46, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Reported
See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Per this complaint you are risking a block. There may still be time for you to reply and promise to stop edit warring. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy#Western pre-schism saints?
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 19:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Ex opere operato
You added to Ex opere operato tags. As a member of the Guild of Copyeditors, I am trying to work on this article, and I added some headings, but I have questions for you.


 * 1) What is needed for cleanup?
 * 2) Is any reorganiation needed?
 * 3) Is the first paragraph satisfactory as a lede?

I agree that copyediting and more inline citations are needed.--DThomsen8 (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello and thank you for your work so far! I can't answer in full right now but I will say that it seems like there isn't much cohesion of focus or tone in the article, hard to explain and perhaps I misplaced the template. I think the lede could use more of a background summary in its primary use as a Christian motto. Well, it's all up to you, I am no expert.--<font face="Helvetica"><small style="font-size:85%;"><font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  05:36, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm Checkingfax. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Allegra Versace has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''What is with all the ((( and ))) around wikilinked terms? And, why change the IPA?''  18:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Huh? I don't know what the former is referring to, but I changed the IPA because the first mark was an apostrophe and not a stress mark, and I changed the e to a reverse epsilon admittedly not from reference but looking at the Italian IPA help article.--<font face="Helvetica"><small style="font-size:85%;"><font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  19:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * EDIT - Ohh, I know now what you're talkling about. I am not sure why that happened, it must have been a glitch in my new browser.--<font face="Helvetica"><small style="font-size:85%;"><font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  19:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to the Google Doodle task force
– Sent using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Today's articles for improvement

Proposed deletion of Laurent Schlumberger


The article Laurent Schlumberger has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Ochib (talk) 14:53, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aghilas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gelasius, Berber and Latinization. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saint-Chamond (tank), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Chamond. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1010:B10C:1E02:38AE:A27B:69:6AB4 (talk) 05:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Syrian Observatory for Human Rights Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Syrian Observatory for Human Rights Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Authority control
What is "authority control"? Uou just added it to Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis - DavidWBrooks (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It's a unique identifier template that helps with several things. See here!--<font face="Helvetica"><small style="font-size:85%;"><font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  16:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Ioannis Kapodistrias
 * added a link pointing to Capo d'Istria


 * Vlorë
 * added a link pointing to Latinization

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Religion in infoboxes
Hi Sigehelmus, I opened a thread at the village pump that might interest you and you might want to give your opinion Regards, --Maragm (talk) 14:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gelderland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wichard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Use of triple parentheses
Please don't tag names with triple parentheses like you did in this edit. — Strongjam (talk) 16:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I made that edit months ago on a public computer with Chrome installed that seemed to have an automated extension that did so (I use Opera).--<font face="Helvetica"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  20:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Pronunciation of Kuczynski
I noticed that the pronunciation of Kuczynski was given as. This looked highly unlikely (/ʃ/ is not a phoneme on its own in Spanish, and [ŋ] does not normally correspond to 'n' before 's'), so I confirmed from numerous videos that the correct pronunciation was ; see, , for instance. Please let me know if you have a source for the pronunciation you put originally. --Iceager (talk) 16:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Cross of Lothair
Can you be more specific about what you thinks needs image cleanup on the article Cross of Lothair? RJFJR (talk) 03:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Article for Deletion/Keeping
Hey hope you are doing well. There is a page you have contributed to that is being considered for deletion: List of Christian Nobel laureates. You are welcome to put in any input on the issues by going to the page and clicking on the link for that article. Jobas (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Puerto Rico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otto-William, Count of Burgundy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

Use of the copy edit tag
Hi Sigehelmus! Thank you for your work on articles on medieval Europe. I've noticed that you frequently add a copy editing-needed tag to these articles. I am one of the coordinators of the Guild of Copy Editors, the Wikiproject that works to improve articles that are tagged for copy editing. While there are often edits that can be made to improve the pages you tag, the same is true of the vast majority of pages on Wikipedia. The tag is intended to identify the most urgent cases, while the articles on medieval Europe are often in decent condition. For example, while Wulfram of Sens could be improved, it is in vastly better shape than, say, Uzbekistan and Oriental Music or Directorate of Technical Education,Mumbai. We do have a separate system for moderately well-written articles that an editor wishes to be further polished, our requests page. I would suggest that many of the articles you are tagging would be better suited for that page, where they can be polished by our best and most experienced members. Le me know if you have any questions about using the requests page. Thanks, Tdslk (talk) 17:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Your recent editing history at The Talmud Unmasked shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 15:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adalrich, Duke of Alsace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Old Franconian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Giotto
 * added a link pointing to Latinization


 * Heiligenkreuz Abbey
 * added a link pointing to Holy Cross


 * Pistacia terebinthus
 * added a link pointing to Palestine


 * Pope Victor II
 * added a link pointing to Hirschberg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Revisions to article on Thomas Muntzer
MurdoMondane (talk) 13:59, 5 October 2016 (UTC) As primary author of the revised article on Thomas Muntzer, as should be evident from the article's history and talk pages, I am a little surprised that you did not have the courtesy to contact me before your recent changes and plastering the article with sundry "multiple issues" stickers.

I have no great objection to you tidying up the syntax for (eg) subtitles and putting the explanation of the main image into a footnote. But I do have the following objections, and I propose to revert them within the next few days unless you can persuade me otherwise:

1. why have you decided to change my "present-day" locations of his birth/death-place to other locations? Changing the birthplace from "present day Saxony-Anhalt" to a geographically vague "Electorate of Saxony" does not help modern-day readers. And changing the place of death from "present-day Thuringia" to a completely erroneous "Landgraviate of Hesse" is less than helpful: Muhlhausen was never in Hesse, and was in fact a Free Imperial City.

2. adding the words "...for his crimes" to the statement that he was executed, is entirely a subjective - and arguably hostile - opinion. Obviously, he would not be executed for anything other than a "crime" in the eyes of his accusers - but in this case the crime was to fight for a religious viewpoint - adding the pejorative 'crime' word here suggests that he was morally culpable. Would you, for example, say that (eg) Dietrich Bonhoeffer or Jan Hus were "executed for their crimes" - or were they simply executed? In any event, Muntzer was never subjected to a formal trial, he was simply captured and tortured, then killed.

3. I have no major objection to you adding the word 'radical' to a description of him as a preacher; but I deliberately left that adjective out since, in the early German Reformation, it was never very clear who was a radical and who was not - in some eyes, Luther was a radical of the first water.

4. I am not sure why you have changed "established [Catholic church]" to "dominant...". By 1525, the Catholic Church was scarcely dominant in the regions in which Muntzer was active. It was, however, the long-established one.

Finally, I rather resent the big sticker which suggest the article requires correction to "grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling". If you can point out to me instances of these, please do so: but I have failed to find any such thing. And I suggest you indicate to me just what is wrong with my citations and references since, again, I can see no specific problems - until, that is, last night: when I left my edit at 18:41 on 4 October, the list of seven books immediately below the numbered citations was intact. By the time you had finished two hours later, that entire list of books had vanished from sight (it is still there, but now hidden). If this elision was deliberate, please tell me why; if it was accidental, let me know and I will revert it with care.

I trust you will respond to my concerns. I have spent a lot of time preparing the revised article - and this is founded on 40 years of study of Thomas Muntzer. I can hold my hands up to not applying rigorous Wiki formatting; but I do not much appreciate the introduction of misinformation.
 * Please calm down and read WP:OWN. I'm not sure what exactly you're asking...--<font face="Helvetica"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  21:29, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

MurdoMondane (talk) 14:10, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

In amongst my - admittedly self-righteous - complaints, I think my important questions are as follows:

1. Why have you changed "present-day" geographical locations to meaningless and - in the second case - wrong alternatives?

2. Why have you decided to add "for his crimes", when Muntzer was never judicially tried for any crime? I would put the case that your three additional words do not represent a "Neutral Point of View", as per WP:NPOV...?

3. Why have you hidden my list of books cited as footnote-references? That concealment makes the footnotes a complete nonsense. I will be quite happy to convert the footnotes so that each one contains the full bibliographical details, if that is what is required for Wikipedia's standards. But please let me do it.

4. By using the "multiple issues" sticker, what else are you specifically wishing to have corrected?

I am aware of WP:OWN. But WP:OWN policy surely does not suggest that someone without knowledge of a subject should have carte blanche to change established facts speculatively or erroneously. Nor does it expect that critical information created by others should be unilaterally hidden from view. I would have corrected your corrections myself before now, but am fully aware of the dangers of an edit-war. My point about 40 years of study was to establish the fact that I am indeed an 'expert in the field' as defined by WP:OWN.

I await your replies to my four questions, so that we can proceed with some measure of agreement.

MurdoMondane (talk) 08:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Please note that I have now provided full bibliographical details for every numbered footnote. I hope this addresses your concerns on 'citations', and that it may incline you to remove the "multiple issues" note? I have not (yet) undone your other edits - points 1 and 2 above - as I await your comments on these.

Saskatchewan
Hi there, I'm not sure why you added a French pronunciation to Saskatchewan. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * There are French pronunciations for all Canadian provinces. French is an official language of Canada by various royal Acts, this is also implicit in all Provinces. I see no reason not to keep it.--<font face="Helvetica"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  21:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you know if this is Wikipedia policy? I'm not being confrontational, I'm just wondering if translations into all official languages is done on foreign articles.  Most of my edits are to US locations.  Thanks.  Magnolia677 (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's usually custom to provide translations for all official/traditional languages of the subject article. I'm not sure if it's solid policy, but I've done it for a couple years and no one's had a problem except when it's not relevant. If I provided a German pronunciation for instance, that would be unneeded because German isn't used in Canada officially. It's just something interesting that adds a cohesive educational element to the article that I like adding. Thank you for asking!--<font face="Helvetica"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  21:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I looked it up and in fact English is the only official language in three provinces: Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan (see ). I'm going to delete the translation and leave a message on the talk pages there.  Should be a lively discussion!  Thanks.  Magnolia677 (talk) 22:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Thomas Muntzer article (continued)
MurdoMondane (talk) 09:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Since I posted my last questions to you on 9th, you appear to have found the time to edit a further 23 articles, but not the time to address my questions. I must therefore assume that you have no further comments to make, and do not wish to engage in an edit-war. So I will now revert your edits indicated by Points and 2 in my previous talk-section. Should you wish to debate this, please engage in a ‘talk’, rather than undertaking any further edits.

I would also remind you of the comment made to you by our colleague “Tdslk” on 15th September, on the matter of plastering Wikipedia with “copy/edit” tags. Not only is the overuse of such tags misleading, as our colleague has indicated, it is also frankly insulting to other contributors who - for many of the articles in which you seem interested - are likely to be educated and careful writers.

I note that you have - with much humour - annotated your edit of 4th October with the words “Various fixes to syntax, grammar, templates, etc. Although much work still needs to be done”; unfortunately, the audit-trail indicates only that you managed to add some unwelcome words, change a pair of commas to a pair of hyphens - oh, and introduce a spurious blank space between the “E” and “a” of the word “Early”; and then lose a complete list of cited works.

I have no problem in admitting that my citation-style was due for improvement; this has now been done. If you had simply stated this to me at the outset, then much trouble and complaint could have been avoided. Please be more respectful of others.

Dodon
Please, hire someone to translate for you from Romanian what means "...cum o face etnicul moldovean Igor Dodon" and refrain adding information on that you are not sure. Those are Crîlov's statements. And, take a look here :) XXN, 21:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I do not mean to revert your good work. But the literal translation "how made an ethnically Moldovan Igor Dodon" does not make sense to English. What is he talking about if not my translation "how is Igor Dodon made an ethnic Moldovan"? Thank you for the message.--<font face="Helvetica"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  21:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Julius Evola
OK, what did I walk into here? I read about the guy, go to Wikipedia, find an article that whitewashes Evola (even based on what little I know), then get attacked by two reputable editors! I have looked into Evola and the entire article is filled with distortions, many contradicted by the articles cited! How do we proceed here? Oh and sorry if I came on too strong - really. I have done good work in the past I'm proud of here. I don't always start out at high wiki standards, but I have learned and I will dedicate the time to good journalism. I have a point of view but I do not want distortions. This is why I often go to original sources. I feel that with some work, we here at Wikipedia can do better journalism than most journalists. Dlawbailey (talk) 09:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Anusvara
Hi and thank you for flagging up that unclear bit of text at Anusvara. I've rewritten it now and I was wondering if it makes sense, or does it need more work? – Uanfala (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Exorcism of the Gerasene demoniac
Hi. How do you know the photo is of a facsimile, not the of original manuscript? Did you contribute the image? Because the original file does not indicate anywhere that it isn't a picture of the original. Thanks, Arminden (talk) 16:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

greetings

 * OH wow, thank you. :p that's my first sort of gift like this. I appreciate, glad to find someone with common interest!--<font face="Helvetica"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  20:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

BLM
The beating was connected to BLM? I don't see this anywhere in the source used, could you provide an updated source that has this info? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Look at the #BLMKidnapping tag on Twitter. There is a plethora of evidence that it was linked to that movement. At the very least, the race is an important factor to mention in context because you know if the races were reversed that would cause riots all over USA.--<font face="Helvetica"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  15:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * This isn't about personal opinion, if it is sourced then okay mention it as a notable factor. If not then I really don't see the need for it as the description sums up the overall context, the reader can follow the source and judge for themselves. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It's not about judgement or opinion, please don't be like that. If you find the mention of race contentious, ironically that is your opinion. The race of these assailants who assaulted, gagged, and tormented a disabled white man to say "fuck white people" and "Fuck Trump" -- and they were all black -- to say race isn't important...? Come on man. See WP:SPADE and WP:CENSOR, reality is reality. Any offense either of us take is inconsequential and frankly an insult to the victim.--<font face="Helvetica"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  15:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your edit on Ladislaus the Posthumous. I also wanted to initiate a copyedit. If you are interested in the history of Central Europe, I think the Age of Migrations is the most interesting period, because many migratory peoples came to the territory and settled there for a shorter or longer period (for instance, Huns, Avars, Magyars, Pechenegs, Cumans, Oghuzes, Romanians). Borsoka (talk) 17:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * George Streeter
 * added a link pointing to Eccentricity


 * Thurible
 * added a link pointing to French

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Passum sub iugum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blood guilt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Cat
Hello, I'm Darkson. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cat have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't vandalise the Cat article to push your POV. The article say "Middle East countries", which Isreal is and Palistine isn't regardless of whether you or I think it should be).
 * No Mistake, I used the template correctly as you're pushing your POV on an article.Darkson (I survived the 525!) 17:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * First of all, I've no clue what "Isreal" and "Palistine" are, although I would wager you may be referring to two contested territories spelled incorrectly (tarnishing your own ability in this matter to others). I removed political references to the roaming area of the cat's ancestor so there is no problem. There's no POV here...it's all on you friend.--<font face="Constantia"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  17:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * There was no POV in that article at all until you started pushing your POV. Israel is a country in the Middle East that the African Wild Cat roams in, whether you like it or not. Darkson (I survived the 525!) 17:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Fine, forget it, it doesn't matter, it's one word and not worth it. I looked at your userpage and you seem far from someone I would oppose anyway. I'm sorry.---<font face="Constantia"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  17:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joscelin of Louvain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brabant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Charlemagne
Hi, I noticed that you changed the description of the denarius featuring Charlemagne to having a "posthumous profile." The description notes that the coin is dated circa 312-314. Charlemagne died in 314 but I guess I don't see where the denarius was definitively produced following Charlemagne's death so describing the profile as posthumous seems odd.Yojimbo1941 (talk) 18:00, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Did you mean 800s? Anyway sure I'll remove if it seems confusing--<font face="Constantia"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  18:09, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Whoops, yeah 800s. I think I need more coffee.  Thanks, I just wanted to check since it seemed pretty specific.Yojimbo1941 (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited South Ossetian name change referendum, 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autonym. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: you smell like curry

copy edit tag on Sacerdos of Limoges
Hi, Sigehelmus. You put a copy edit tag on Sacerdos of Limoges. Could you tell me what copy edits you want to see on that page? Thanks, Tdslk (talk) 00:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Unsourced assertions
You have raised objections to the use of the term "German nationalism" that are not based on reliable sources interpreted via the policies and guidelines here, here, here, and here.

The last three diffs in particular assert that "German nationalism" means only only a call for territorial expansion, and you make this unsupported by any source, and that claim is contradicted by all the reliable sources cited in the German nationalism article.

Please be aware that repeatedly making claims as you have is WP:DISRUPTIVE and that the community topic bans people who edit this way. Jytdog (talk) 18:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Your comment here is not about improving the article; it doesn't belong on an article Talk page per WP:TPG.  I am telling you what happens in Wikipedia, not "threatening" you.  You can hear that, or not. See you at the talk page.  Jytdog (talk) 21:22, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve De conviviis barbaris
Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Sigehelmus, thanks for creating De conviviis barbaris!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs more references to substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 12:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Maduro
Hello. As you might know or not, Maduro was just designed as a Dictator by U.S. Government (he already was but nobody seem to notice it( and sanctions were imposed. I am kindly asking you to revert the change you did. http://news.sky.com/story/us-imposes-sanctions-on-dictator-maduro-10969265 --Ssthormess (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:RS and WP:NPOV thoroughly. This site relies upon (or at least aims to rely upon) unbiased and reliable, balanced sources. One designation is not enough, and you did not even provide a citation. That is also not his title. Example: Many Americans would call King George III a 'tyrant' but do you see that as his official title in his page? The infobox is for official titles only. Please read the articles I named firstly before.--<font face="Constantia"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  21:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Gwynllyw
Hi Sigehelmus. Thanks for your addition at Gwynllyw. But I now see that none of those three denominations listed in the infobox are currently supported by the article text. I guess it's obvious that the name of the Newport Cathedral suggests veneration by the Anglican Church. But I wondered if we could find actual sources for all three. Do you know if Gwynllyw hs a Saint's Day in the calendars of each? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not immediately familiar with the hagiography of the Anglican Churches, my main contributions to saints' articles thus far have concerned with pre-Schism Catholic saints (in almost all cases) being eo ipso Orthodox saints. I have seen icons of Gwnyllyw but I will try to find sources though for all 3 denominations. Thanks for the message--<font face="Constantia"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)  20:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for the clarification. I'll try too. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature :
 * uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
 * has an unescaped equals, which must be coded as  to avoid messing up templates.
 * appears to have templating intended to place pages into categories, which is not allowed per WP:SIG.
 * uses font color coal, which is not recognized in the new markup. I propose changing it to DarkGoldenrod , which is reasonably close. If this is not the color you want, please go to Web colors and choose a color name on the list of HTML color names or the list of X11 color names.

Please change
 * : <font face="Constantia"> <font color="DarkKhaki">Sıgehelmus <font color="Coal"> (Talk) &#124;д=)

to
 * : <b style="color: DarkKhaki;">Sıgehelmus</b> <b style="color: DarkGoldenrod"> (Talk) &#124;д&#61;)</b>

—Anomalocaris (talk) 21:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Sigehelmus, most users are cooperating in our effort to get the lint out. Your cooperation would be appreciated. —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * So sorry for the late response, ; I just gave myself a default signature now until I can craft a compatible one.--Sigehelmus (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Per se ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_scientists_opposing_the_mainstream_scientific_assessment_of_global_warming?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gilbert de Lacy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-Norman ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gilbert_de_Lacy check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gilbert_de_Lacy?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josephinism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Josephinism check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Josephinism?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Corvulus of Friuli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lombard ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Corvulus_of_Friuli check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Corvulus_of_Friuli?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, from the Portals WikiProject...
The Portals WikiProject was rebooted 9 days ago, and is going strong. Fifty-two editors have joined so far, with more joining daily.

Our goal is to revitalize the entire portal system, and most every portal in it. (We've already speedy deleted some as part of the clean up effort - they were empty husks).

So far, we've created a template with supporting Lua module to transclude excerpts of the current version of an article, to use instead of copy and paste. Excerpts using the template never go stale or fork.

There are 1500+ portals, so we will need all the help we can get!

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

On the WikiProject page, there's a watchlist of all the pages in the portal namespace, for viewing Related changes.

With more to come.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,     &mdash; The Transhumanist   02:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Childe Harold's Pilgrimage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frontispiece ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Childe_Harold%27s_Pilgrimage check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Childe_Harold%27s_Pilgrimage?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much
The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,  &mdash; The Transhumanist   23:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please ping me. Thank you. -TT

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mos maiorum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Germanic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mos_maiorum check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mos_maiorum?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Papal Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lepanto ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Papal_Navy check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Papal_Navy?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cannabis in Vatican City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Per se ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Cannabis_in_Vatican_City check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Cannabis_in_Vatican_City?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yanji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Synthesis ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Yanji check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Yanji?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gregory of Tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clovis ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gregory_of_Tours check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gregory_of_Tours?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Sick of minimal design? I can relate to you!
I can totally relate to your emotions about this omnipresent minimal flat design fetishism that spread around the world. Maybe because I have asperger's syndrome. I like the letters in the new Wikipedia padlocks, but this flat design which looks like animations from Kurzgesagt Nutshell, are heavily overrated and have no depth at all. Finally somebody to relate to. I thought I was alone. --79.241.206.3 (talk) 02:21, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Wow, same here friend! :D I didn't expect that at all and indeed I share your situation and condition. I even have have a distate for Kurzgesagt, especially too since I know some of their biases. Maybe nostalgia plays a role for me too, but the current minimalist trends are just sickening to me and tell a lot about our age, in my analysis. I miss serifs and edges and shading and other aspects that almost give an essence of "craftsmanship", if that makes sense. Anyway, I definitely hope the

locks get updated again to something better one day, and if it is any consolation, no movement lasts forever. Here's hoping the successor isn't worse though, haha. When I design something, I make sure to keep the good old aesthetic to it. I also the notice the Japanese reject the trend too by the way, so it must be a western phenomenon and sign of general decay,...anyway, thank you for for the kind message, please do consider signing up as well!-- <b style="color:MediumSlateBlue;">Sıgehelmus</b><b style="color: SlateGray"> (Tωlk)</b> 03:00, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chernobog, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pantheon and Dualism ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Chernobog check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Chernobog?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beauty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Objectivity ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Beauty check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Beauty?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)