User talk:Sigmund Monk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cognishift.org (September 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JJPMaster were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cognishift.org and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Cognishift.org Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JJPMaster&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cognishift.org reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JJPMas ter 00:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Cognishift.org


A tag has been placed on Draft:Cognishift.org, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 03:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 03:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)  You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 06:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

So are you explicitly declining the path offered to you by ? We have plenty of people copy editing and copy editing does not demonstrate your understanding of this situation. 331dot (talk) 17:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * no, i have to start from basics, its clear that i cannot learn the method outright, will start with the assignments of copy editing and go aheadSigmund Monk (talk) 18:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Not every statement needs to be an unblock request- only one open unblock request is needed. Subsequent comments should be standard comments like this.  We don't want to see your ability to copy edit- we want to see your ability to do as NinjaRobotPirate said.  If you don't yet know what you want to edit about, that's fine- you may request unblock when you do, there is no deadline.  Someone else will review your request should you choose to keep it active, but this will likely count against you. 331dot (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Lputian was interviewed by Cognishift in Aug 2023 and was featured in the book The Monk with a Stethoscope, detailing how he served to inspire and cultivate many grandmasters in Armenia and cultivated chess as a culture in Armenian Schools Sigmund Monk (talk) 19:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * please see the above, Sigmund Monk (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
 * but being in blocked mode, Iam not able to preview the reference to make corrections, I cannot learn in block mode. Sigmund Monk (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

While being blocked means that you cannot edit the article, you can edit this talk page and fix the entry above to ensure that the reference is formatted correctly. This will give admin the confidence that you have the competence needed to edit Wikipedia. Please fix your above edit so that the reference is formatted correctly. WP:CITE has information on how to do this. Z1720 (talk) 00:45, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I reported this spammer as a SPA and COI with Cognishift. They even hijacked extant reference here. As they continue to cite Cognishift in their unblock request, without any clarification of their connection to this website, COI should be considered as their major problem. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 01:37, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

The term "Grandmaster" was immortalized by Czar Nicholas II of Russia (1914) and the title was informally given to 5 players. The responsibility was later left up to FIDE, who were based out of Paris (1924)