User talk:Signedzzz

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:25, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Rand Paul
Any reason why you deleted the fact that the judge who sentenced Paul's attacker to 30 days in prison, rather than the prosecutors' requested 21 month prison sentence, is a Bill Clinton appointee? Don't tell me it's irrelevant because that is nonsense. Quis separabit? 04:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not mentioned in the ref, so it's WP:OR. zzz (talk) 04:42, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

2018 North Korea–United States summit
Hello, I recovered the contents regarding the actual international reaction, and I also updated reference of example to international reaction. Please don't remove the facts along with WP:NPOV Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 01:07, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * WP:NOR is a WP:policy. zzz (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello

WP:NPOV is one of the crucial WP:POLICYs, if you remove the international reaction because of your belief or personal preference, and empathise the contrary opinion on the top front side of reaction part, it would be violation of  WP:NPOV. Before getting advice from WP:3O, I will response your query on the talk page of the subject. Goodtiming8871 (talk) 03:29, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit on Gerald Nye
Hello, I see that you have been warned about making disruptive edits. Please don't remove the facts along with WP:NPOV.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards. Suite1408 (talk) 03:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Continue falsifying sources and you will no doubt end up getting blocked. zzz (talk) 06:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It is not my intention to falsify sources, it is my intention to make sure there is balance and compromise. Sorry if you don't care for my edits but don't try to start an edit war and please... try to find some common ground with other fellow Wikipedians and resolve conflicts civilly or you will no doubt end up getting blocked. Suite1408 (talk) 06:21, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Incompetence is not a valid defence in Wikipedia. See WP:CIR. zzz (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Possible renaming of "Sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic dioceses of Pennsylvania"
Signedzzz, I reverted your edits to the lede of Sexual abuse scandal in the Catholic dioceses of Pennsylvania, because your revised lede would indicate that this page focuses entirely on the six-diocese grand jury investigation. The title of the page is more general than that; it covers all of Pennsylvania. So -- as it now stands -- the lede needs to be more general.

However, after thinking about your edits, I'm wondering if the page should focus solely on the six-diocese investigation. I've started a section about this on the article's talk page, in case you want to weigh in. Thanks!! &mdash; Lawrence King ( talk ) 02:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Stop using the sources on Magic (supernatural) that you can't even access. 1100 BCE is a WP:FRINGE date for Zoroaster. Orientls (talk) 04:17, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

United States of America v. Joaquín Guzmán Loera
Hello, thanks for your recent updates at United States of America v. Joaquín Guzmán Loera. BTW, I re-added El Chapo's reaction when the verdict was made. Found a source from the NYT that mentions he was stunned when the verdict was read (the title of the article mentions it, and it is currently at the NYT's main page). Feel free to make the appropriate changes. MX ( ✉  •  ✎  ) 03:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * User:MX Thanks for the note. The NYT does say he looked "vaguely stunned"; my reservation is that he cannot be looking both "stunned" and "resigned" (per AP) simultaneously, hence why I think it is better to simply not comment on any interpretations of his facial expression. Frankly, I suspect some kind of schadenfreud is infecting some of the reporting here. I think I'll probably leave it, though, if no one else sees a problem. zzz (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

RFC Request
Dear Fellow Wikipedian

I would like to invite you to my RFC request on  the page One America News Networks. I am reaching out to you to include your expert opinion and your solution to this problem in the RFC request. Please also invite more editors so that we can have a fair discussion that will improve the page.

Kind Regards

Saad Ahmed2983 (talk) 11:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)                    –
 * Now at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Signedzzz reported by User:Sanglahi86 (Result: ). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Philippine Drug War. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:39, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Standard notice about American Politics
— JFG talk 11:13, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Donald Trump
Hi, could you please self-revert your recent edit to Donald Trump? I haven't removed any relevant sourced content. Thanks. Onetwothreeip (talk) 11:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The content you removed was both sourced and relevant, and obviously so. So why did you post this? zzz (talk) 14:11, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Which content are you referring to? I may have only moved or merged content. Onetwothreeip (talk) 21:46, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

2019 Yuen Long attacks
Hello, I noticed recent additions to: 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests

You may also consider adding some of your content to the main page on the topic as well, because it is in need of some updates and improvements ... 2019 Yuen Long violence

Thanks for your help!!! : ) 65.60.163.223 (talk) 02:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree it's in need of improvement. I'll have a look. I'm not convinced the attack needs its own page right now, though. zzz (talk) 06:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, some editors are cutting content from the Yuen Long section on the HK protests page, and saying it should go to the "main" page where a longer article is more appropriate ... there was already a discussion to merge, and it failed. 65.60.163.223 (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think that makes any sense, since the "main" page is already much longer. zzz (talk) 07:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I mean that content is being shifted from here: 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests to the "main topic page" which is here: 2019 Yuen Long violence
 * Yes, I understand. I don't see any further need for that. zzz (talk) 07:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

14.0.164.168
His edit may be disruptive and he is doing so in 2019 Hong Kong protests page again. Could you help revert it?Mariogoods (talk) 00:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It's nothing to worry about: he'll get bored, and after he's finished, all the edits can easily be reverted. zzz (talk) 00:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Donald Trump
Hi there, can you explain why you added these multiple citations and other changes you made in this edit? Thanks. Onetwothreeip (talk) 06:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If there are unnecessary references, it would be helpful if you removed them without removing any article text, otherwise it is too hard to tell what you removed and why. zzz (talk) 06:39, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Why did you add the article text then? Ideally I would like to hear your reasons why and use that to edit collaboratively. Onetwothreeip (talk) 07:17, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * The article text is there as a result of collaborative editing. I merely restored it. zzz (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure but for what reason? Onetwothreeip (talk) 07:54, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary 4
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2020 (UTC)