User talk:Sijothankam

 Welcome

Hi ! welcome to Wikipedia!

Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use  ~  (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use New contributors' help page. You can also type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! utcursch | talk 04:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

India quick links
utcursch | talk 04:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Nithya.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nithya.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Low dimensional chaos


The article Low dimensional chaos has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article is written in an essay style which is unsuitable for Wikipedia; it is unsourced; and we already have articles on the logistic map and bouncing ball dynamics.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gandalf61 (talk) 08:35, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Moved to User:Sijothankam/Low-dimensional chaos (talk) as a userspace draft. – Athaenara  ✉  21:12, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thankamani


A tag has been placed on Thankamani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. EBE123 talkContribs 23:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Thankamani
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Thankamani, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Madan Lal Mehta
Hello,

I have revised the article on Madan Lal Mehta, trying to make it a bit more encyclopaedia-style. One unfortunate consequence of my editing is that some content (which was unref-d) disappeared (perhaps it should be returned together with some ref-s).

Anyhow, could you please review the revised version?

Thank you very much, Sasha (talk) 17:25, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miguel A. F. Sanjuán


The article Miguel A. F. Sanjuán has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence that it meets the notability criteria for professors

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 22:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Gilbert Strang.jpg
Hi there Sijo. I happened to come across your photograph of Gilbert Strang, and I really like it. To me it seems like the sort of image that might stand a good shot at becomign a featured picture, so I have listed it at picture peer review to get feedback from more experienced Wikipedians. Hope that that's okay. Thanks very much. A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs) 17:48, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi again. After running your photograph through peer review, I was told that might be worth a shot as a featured picture candidate, so I have listed it there. Hope that this is okay. Thanks again! A Thousand Doors (talk &#124; contribs)

Possibly unfree File:Gilbert Strang.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gilbert Strang.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Avenue (talk) 00:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Celso Grebogi


The article Celso Grebogi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Fiddle  Faddle  16:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Bifurcation bouncing ball.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:25, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Ott, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages United State and James Yorke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Norman J Wildberger


The article Norman J Wildberger has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Having a Youtube channel does not make you notable, and looking at it the Youtube channel is hardly popular or famous, by just the viewcount. No other evidence of or claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 01:55, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Norman J Wildberger shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vladimir G Zelevinsky


The article Vladimir G Zelevinsky has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 04:10, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladimir G Zelevinsky


A tag has been placed on Vladimir G Zelevinsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Anastasia (talk) 00:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lock Yue Chew


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lock Yue Chew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  14:27, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anil Shaji
Hello, Sijothankam. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Anil Shaji, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Anil Shaji to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Arbustum (talk) 16:34, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

The article Anil Shaji has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:31, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Anil Shaji
I am afraid that your article was deleted by NawlinWiki. I stated that you should add references, did you add any? If it was too late, I am afraid but you will have to check ''[|this page] and contact the person who speedily deleted your work.

Please write back, and after each post make sure to end with four of '~'.

Arbustum (talk) 18:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anil Shaji


A tag has been placed on Anil Shaji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 02:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Celso Grebogi


A tag has been placed on Celso Grebogi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 02:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Page move Anil Shaji
May I know, why you moved Anil Shaji back to mainspace, given that it was been deleted as being non-notable? It and was moved to your userspace on your request, so that you can work on it if you want. -- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 02:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Celso Grebogi


The article Celso Grebogi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Multiple reliable sources have not been provided to establish notability. All the four references are to the subject's published research papers, which doesn't make them notable. Two external link are to the universities webpages and 3rd to google scholar, which again doesn't make them notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:15, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Anil Shaji for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anil Shaji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anil Shaji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 08:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Anupmehra - Let's talk!  08:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lock Yue Chew


The article Lock Yue Chew has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NPROF. An associate professor with h-index 21 (Google Scholar)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 13:15, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Lock Yue Chew for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lock Yue Chew is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lock Yue Chew until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 07:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)