User talk:Sijothankam/Low-dimensional chaos

Low-dimensional chaos
How come you conclude this article is not worthy !!! I am writing this article one by one in my spare time. Can you tell me where you people had seen the clear explanation of butterfly effect ? Do you think the bouncing ball system in the Wikipedia is complete?? That is not the point here. When people here about chaos they think about complex systems. So for a beginner chaos is something difficult. But there is something called low dimensional chaos which is highly simple to understand. I think we can group all the other topics on chaos together. The list is not over, I write more about chaos in simple systems, but if you are not satisfied with the article, I am sorry. I will not be a volunteer anymore. Be patient when you see a developing venture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.141.49.11 (talk • contribs)


 * You are very welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia, but in order to be a useful contributer you need to understand and respect our standards and policies. There are several problems with this article:
 * It does not give its sources. Every Wikipedia article must refer to reliable sources; articles based on original research are not allowed on Wikipedia.
 * It is written in an essay style, often addressing the reader directly using "we". Wikipedia articles shoould generally be written in the third person.
 * We already have an extensive article on the logistic map, and a shorter one on bouncing ball dynamics. If you want to write about these subjects, it would be better to start by adding to these articles, rather than writing a new article that covers the same ground.
 * You might like to read Writing better articles, which contains a lot of useful advice for new editors. Gandalf61 (talk) 08:14, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree that there are problems with the draft article as it stands. However:
 * Sources can be added - this is clearly not original research and is based on reliable sources even if they are not yet cited.
 * Style can be fixed (and one of the third-person exceptions is mathematics, although possibly not as used here)
 * There is no reason that one article should not include summaries of several others. This can be a useful summary of LDC, although doubtless guidance on both style and content would be valuable and appreciated.
 * Rich Farmbrough, 14:57, 17 May 2011 (UTC).