User talk:Siksok

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Siksok, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Kafka Liz (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Flags
Hi Siksok. Could you please read over the talkpage discussion concerning the addition of flag icons before re-adding them? The Ottoman flag is inappropriate in this context due to the complex nature of sucession. If you believe strongly that it should be included, despite this problems, you are welcome to make a case on the talkpage. Thanks, Kafka Liz (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Diyarbakır
Please explain your removal of "unofficial capital" at Talk:Diyarbakır. John Vandenberg (chat) 03:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Please go here: Talk:Diyarbakır
 * Read those sources.
 * If you another perspective, we can incorporate both points of view.
 * But we need to discuss that on the talk page.
 * John Vandenberg (chat) 12:44, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Kirkuk
I see you added "unofficial capital" to Kirkuk. I see one possible source on Google Books, but it will not let me view the text. Have you seen "unofficial capital" ever written in newspapers or books? If so, please start a discussion at Talk:Kirkuk. -- John Vandenberg (chat) 03:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Sultanate of Rûm. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Kafka Liz (talk) 10:57, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Diyarbakır
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Kafka Liz (talk) 11:55, 27 December 2009 (UTC) for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. 24 hour WP:3RR violation block at Diyarbakır. LessHeard vanU (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Famousturkicpeoples.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Famousturkicpeoples.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ( talk  05:39, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Thepeople Turks.png
Thanks for uploading File:Thepeople Turks.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  05:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sultanate of Rum, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Turkey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Kralizec! (talk) 17:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ayyubid dynasty. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Egypt, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ayyubid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ayyubid dynasty, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Please note that you can't simply change the text in an article and leave the existing reference in place, as you've done here. If you feel that your version is correct, then you must cite a reliable source to that effect. Note that Wikipedia's verification policy says "all material in Wikipedia articles must be attributable to a reliable published source," especially when the material is likely to be challenged. Thank you, and please heed the numerous warnings others have left for you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kurdish people.Kermanshahi (talk) 15:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gyrofrog (talk) 16:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Egypt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Your edits and blocks
I see you have a history of changing cited text and of blocks. I also see you have never discussed these either on article talk pages or here. Editing Wikipedia is a collaborative exercise and editors are required to work with other editors and communicate with them. If you continue to not communicate and to add uncited changes or change cited text you will probably end up blocked until you agree to change your behaviour. Dougweller (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Don't remove sourced info.
Selam. Don't remove sourced infomation. Kaynaklara göre çalışmaya özen gösterin. Yine engellenmek için de faydalı olacaktır. İy çalılşmalar.'' Takabeg (talk) 06:13, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Turkey
It's based only on your own POV. Don't stop remove sources information. Takabeg (talk) 06:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Turkey. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kafka Liz (talk) 13:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

July 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Turkey. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 05:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

talk pages
We have them for a reason: to use them, y'know. So go here and state your grievances. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:22, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Turkey. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gyrofrog (talk) 14:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You've been repeatedly warned about removing sourced demographic figures and replacing them with unsourced data. Furthermore you are evidently unwilling or unable to discuss your edits as requested. The net effect of your edits has been that of disruption. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Furthermore the username itself evidently presents an issue; see WP:ANI/IncidentArchive707#Siksok. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)