User talk:Silasjay

Silasjay, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lyndon B. Johnson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lyndon B. Johnson was changed by Silasjay (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91021 on 2014-04-04T18:31:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:31, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to SEAL Team 8: Behind Enemy Lines with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  A m i t  웃  20:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Lyndon B. Johnson. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

You may find this essay, which details best practice, helpful. Rivertorch (talk) 22:00, 4 April 2014 (UTC)