User talk:Silent Skier

January 2014
Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Longhorn crazy ant because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Lugia2453 (talk) 21:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, such as your block notice at User talk:Ghanf100. Kuru  (talk)  21:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at B. S. Baliga with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.  Tide  rolls  22:12, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. only (talk) 23:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Excellent! I got banned for editing the sandbox!


 * You are blocked, not banned. And you are not blocked for editing the sandbox. You are blocked for registering an account and within 19 edits, doing this:


 * If you really want to have a second chance and edit constructively, please say so. Tell me that you understand why you were blocked. Tell me that you won't do it again. It's no big deal. Some editors start this way. It's not too late to change. Wikipedia could use your helpful edits. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:03, 6 January 2014 (UTC)