User talk:SilkTork/Archive2/Archive 68

April music
I like to see Appalachian Spring on the Main page today (not by me, just interested and reviewed), and I also made it my story. How do you like the compromise in the composer's infobox? - How do you like the statue (look up places)? - I was undecided so show three versions ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Gerda! SilkTork (talk) 16:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Today I see Marian Anderson as my top story (by NBC, 1939), and below (on my talk) three people with raised arms, - and the place is the cherry blossom in Frauenstein. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * plum tree blossom for Kalevi Kiviniemi in the snow - see my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * today a sad task - memory of Andrew Davis - turned into entertainment (yt at the bottom of his article, actually both) -- the latest pictures capture extreme weather --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Raheeiejaz907
Last year, you blocked  for socking. Raheeiejaz907 renamed the talk page of Typically, such actions are indicative of socking as well. While the editing patterns of both users are similar, editing Pakistan military-related BLPs. I'm curious why latter wasn't also blocked based on this behavioral evidence? — Saqib ( talk  |  contribs ) 19:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the head's up, User:Saqib. It's highly likely I didn't block because I wasn't aware and so didn't look into it. The sockmaster of Raheeiejaz907 is User:Raheelejaz907 who hasn't edited in a while, so there is unlikely to be much in the way of current technical evidence. I am no longer a checkuser (I never keep those tools when I leave ArbCom) so I couldn't investigate anyway. If Atif ahmad8 is editing unproblematically, and there is no evidence of ongoing socking (that is one user editing the same material simultaneously from two or more accounts), then it's not something that would excite my interest anyway. It's the spirit/intention of the policy/guideline that I tend to follow, rather than strict wording. If Atif ahmad8 starts to edit problematically or in concert with Raheelejaz907, then please let me know, and I'll look into it. SilkTork (talk) 10:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * But I believe Atif ahmad8 should be blocked, with the possibility of being unblocked only if they agree not to engage in sockpuppetry again. I strongly suspect that the IPs responsible for removing sourced material from this BLP yesterday belong to this Atif ahmad8. — Saqib ( talk  |  contribs ) 10:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I can't help you there, as I no longer have the tools to look into it. You're better off putting forward a case at WP:SPI. I don't have much experience at that sort of thing, but I do understand that they like to have evidence in the form of diffs. SilkTork (talk) 11:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Lobsterthermidor part III
Hi SilkTork. Remember ? You blocked him in Feb '21 and he resurfaced as an IP last May (see here) when you re-blocked him. Well, he's been back editing since at least last October from the IPv6 range. I came across the edits by chance while doing AV work. He's staying away from his former editing areas, but there's no doubt about it: compare this (before) and this (after his edits) for example. I haven't looked at the edits in any depth, but the work looks depressingly familiar: superficially good, but bloated and probably riddled with the usual OR and unreliable sources. Worth doing anything about, do you think? —Smalljim 22:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree, that is clearly User:Lobsterthermidor. Blocked, and then I blocked the range. In order to discourage Lobsterthermidor from continuing this game, we should track down and remove all their recent contributions per WP:EVADE. SilkTork (talk) 08:20, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * User:Smalljim, I've reverted the edits I spotted. Let me know if you spot any others. SilkTork (talk) 08:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks once again for your non-involved admin action. There are 391 edits to 116 pages - many of which have later edits, so it's not trivial work. As a start I've made a simple list at User:Smalljim/Lt III fix. —Smalljim  23:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I've reverted the edits by 2A00:23C6:C423:4401:FC7F:7A96:5E67:304E. I'll see if I can get round to some more later. SilkTork (talk) 08:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've done a few this evening. —Smalljim  21:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * He's back. Same /64 range. —Smalljim  11:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I've extended the block. SilkTork (talk) 09:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * TVM. It's a shame he can't stay on Commons where the rules suit him better and he's already done loads of work. —Smalljim  11:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

May music
Today's story mentions a concert I loved to hear (DYK) and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old (OTD). - I can't recall a DYK hook with links to five composers, so am a bit proud of it. Better than my first idea, actually. (The discussion is on the talk, and reading it as humourous is perhaps a good idea.) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:01, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

29 May 1913: The Rite of Spring - today's story, actually something I saw at that place in a revival. - Do you remember the infobox discussion 100 years after the premiere, often mentioned in the arbcase? - Today a user who returned after several years said that nothing changed. Would you agree? I wouldn't ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

June music
Franz Kafka died 100 years ago OTD, hence the story. I uploaded a few pics from the visit of Graham87. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Today's story is about a tune used by Bach and Mozart. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Today I wanted to write a happy song story, on a friend's birthday, but instead we have the word of thunder on top of it, which would have been better on 2 June, this year's first Sunday after Trinity. The new lilypond - thanks to DanCherek - is quite impressive. As my 2 Jun story said: Bach was fired up. - Today's Main page is rich in music, also Franz Liszt and a conductor. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Today is "the day" for James Joyce, also for Bach's fourth chorale cantata (and why does it come before the third?) - the new pics have a mammal I had to look up. - Did you know that after the RfC for Joyce, I thought these infobox wars were over? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC)


 * We are going to Dublin next month. A little late for Bloom's Day, but I shall still visit Davy Byrne's pub where I shall have a cheese sandwich with a glass of wine (they, of course, do have it on the menu: 20 Euros). Chrissie is more interested in Beckett, so will visit Trinity College with Phocea while I do the Guinness tour. We will then tour the south of Ireland in a retro campervan, and go kiss the Blarney stone. My mother's family is from Waterford in Ireland, so this will be something of a pilgrimage for me. SilkTork (talk) 18:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Sounds great! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
 * New pics of food and flowers come with the story of Noye's Fludde (premiered on 18 June), written by Brian Boulton. I nominated Éric Tappy because he died, and it needs support today! I nominated another women for GA in the Women in Green June run, - review welcome, and more noms planned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:56, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 * A review was started, and no other noms were good enough. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:24, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I rarely get involved in audits these days. Though I have two articles that I have had on the back burner for a long time which I intend (perhaps "vaguely consider" is the better way of putting it) to submit for FA (A1 in London) and GA (Brewing). I bought a book two or three years ago, because it has a little more detail about the tram that went up Archway Road, but I've not yet made use of it. Good luck with your noms. SilkTork (talk) 08:54, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Good plans! - While the women's month is over I think about Zwei Gesänge, Op. 1 (Schönberg) for GA, - I had great help for the musical part which I could have never done with that expertise, - something I like about Wikipedia: to combine the talents of people. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Reporting suspicious User
Hello respected @SilkTork I hope you're well. My name is Parwiz from Panjshir, Afghanistan, and I'm a Wikipedia user. All my activities are focused on my country, Afghanistan. Recently, someone named @Gabriel606 has been opposing my activities without any reason. I don't know what his goal is, but when I visited his talk page, I saw that he had previously been accused of taking money in exchange for publishing articles. It seems that he is involved in activities that are not aligned with Wikipedia's policies, and a team of experienced users is supporting him. I hope they can be identified and blocked.

He is unfairly nominating my articles for deletion, which discourages me from continuing to work on Wikipedia. Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 15:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * In June 2023, @Bbb23 asked you a question of your previous account. But you decided not to reply. In January 2023, @Melcous warned you against vadalism but it doesn't seem like you have changed. In June 2024, @thetechie also warned you against WP:CANVASS but you never saw that right. Before I nominated your article for AFD. A lot of your article has been nominated and was deleted because you never submitted them for review. There is no article of yours you have ever submitted and they got accepted. You said "a team of experienced users is supporting him. I hope they can be identified and blocked". You seem to be funny lol. I hope you learn your lessons someday, because all this editors that has ever reached out to you are just trying to help you. But you want them all blocked so you can have the world all to yourself. lol and cheers.  Gabriel  (talk to me )  16:42, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * If there is something going on that I can help with, let me know; but please - both of you - don't come to my talkpage to moan about other users without any other purpose than to insult that user.
 * Parwiz ahmadi, I am giving you an informal caution regarding making accusations against other users without evidence: see Casting aspersions and No personal attacks. If you are concerned that Din Mohammad Jurat is going to be deleted, then your best approach is to look into the concerns about the article, and find reliable sources.
 * Gabriel601, I am also giving you an informal caution regarding Casting aspersions, and suggest that you strike the personal comments in your AfD nomination: Articles for deletion/Din Mohammad Jurat - these sentences are unnecessary and are personal attacks: "Also the creator of the article seems to be a newbie which I guess hasn't practiced about the wikipedia article wizard before contributing to wikipedia." and "Maybe he had to fake it to make it look like its an independent reliable source". Remember: Comment on content, not on the contributor. SilkTork (talk) 08:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Gurjotsachdeva (05:00, 20 June 2024)
Hi, thank you for extending your support. I wish to create a Wikipedia page - how can I go about it? Appreciate your guidance. Thank you. --Gurjotsachdeva (talk) 05:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, welcome to Wikipedia, Gurjotsachdeva. One of the things I have learned during my time on Wikipedia is that pretty much any question I have has already been answered. The trick is how to find that answer. The search function on Wikipedia is pretty good (not perfect, but pretty good). So my first approach to looking for an answer is to put the keywords from my question into the search box, but putting "WP:" first. So your question is - how to I create a page? So, if I put, into the search box I get How to create a page. If I put , into the search box I get Help:Your first article. Both provide useful information with links to Article wizard and Articles for creation.
 * My suggestion for you is to edit a few existing articles before attempting to create your own article. You will learn a lot from doing that, and you will benefit the project. You will make mistakes, everyone does, and people will point them out to you (or simply revert your edits). Be patient. While anyone can edit Wikipedia, and it is fairly easy to do, it takes time to learn how to edit it successfully such that other editors respect your contributions and either leave them as they are, or build constructively on them.
 * I suggest you start by reading through some articles that interest you, and do some simple copy-editing (see Basic copyediting), correcting spelling and grammar mistakes, and helping improve the flow of the language. You could find articles which need copyediting at Category:All articles needing copy edit. Once you have done that for a while, and feel comfortable, you can move on to adding sources (citing a reliable book or text, or linking to a reliable website - see Help:Referencing for beginners, and for more advanced information see Citing sources). You can find a big list of articles that need sources added at Category:All articles with unsourced statements. Adding sources is important, and you would find it difficult to get an article accepted on Wikipedia these days without proper sourcing, so it's useful to learn how to do it.
 * That's plenty for you to read. You don't need to read it all at once; though it is useful to have the links so you can refer to the information now and again. If you are not sure you have the time to learn how to write an article, you could request one be written at Requested articles.
 * Good luck! SilkTork (talk) 08:23, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Voliveira7777 (01:49, 22 June 2024)
Hello, My intent is not to be rude. However, are you an AI or a real person? --Voliveira7777 (talk) 01:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes. SilkTork (talk) 08:03, 22 June 2024 (UTC)