User talk:SilkTork/IceBaby

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tunneli logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tunneli logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

French?
I'm scared of tigers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.32.128.155 (talk) 04:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC).

Cymbal manufacturers advocacy
I see you haven't made any inquiries outside of WikiProject Music; given how much activity there's been regarding recent inquiries about the most common musical instruments (see the saxophone and trombone entries) I'm not sure that this is the best place to look to as far as devising notability criteria.

The only editor I've found who's consistently worked on cymbal-related articles is User:Andrewa, who has, in fact, created a number of the articles within that category. I'm not sure how the advocacy process actually works (I've never heard of it until now), but I'd suggest that direction as a start. –Unint 15:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Or perhaps even WikiProject Guitarists, where people are probably more likely to be knowledgeable about instruments and equipment. –Unint 16:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. SilkTork 00:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

what's up
been checking my email and your page. Now I see you have me listed as withdrawn. Could you explain, please, what is going on? Were you not going to tell me? Have I done something wrong? Please tell me if I have. --Mattisse 21:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not withdraw. Please tell me what you think. Please do not desert me. Please be my friend. Not hearing from you and not interacting with you is what is causing distress. Please tell my your opinions. Please. I have only felt good a little part of today when you said you would be in touch. I have been waiting so much to hear from you. Sincerely, Mattisse

I have no problems with remaining in dialogue with you by email. However, I feel you might be better served by someone with more time on their hands, and more experience of the Arbitration process than myself. SilkTork 07:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Then I respectfully request that you answer my emails, even just one of them. You have not so far and I would greatly appreciate that you answer my questions, at least some of them, or even just send me an email. I am now being accused of "driving you off" by some people you contacted publically on my behalf. Is that true? What was the result of all that contacting you did and all that time you spent on it. Could you give me even a short summary of what you found out? I seem to be the only person involved whom you have not contacted. Please do, I plead with you. Sincerely,  Mattisse 14:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I emailed last night - did you not get it? Anyway, you have not driven me off - I am quite happy to continue our relationship. It was my own decision to withdraw as advocate due to my realisation of the incompatibility of my experience, skills, knowledge, free time, and personality with the needs of the situation. My mistake. I was too hasty in taking up the reins of this case, and hadn't looked at it closely enough beforehand. I am an open person, and my approach would be open discussion. It has been pointed out to me by several people that this approach may not be the most appropriate for this matter. Also, as I have a busy job, I am unable to respond to matters as timely as is obviously required given the fast moving devlopments in the arbitration case. SilkTork 14:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ShepsLogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:ShepsLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:12, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:MarstonsLogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:MarstonsLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Destiny's Child
Please don't remove templates without discussion, explanation, or justification, and without doing anything to remedy the problem referred to. You didn't even fill in the edit summary box; please use it when you make edits. --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 10:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi - I've just removed the tag and then saw your message. The thinking behind the removal is that the tag is for indicating on articles where some editing is required. The tag is not intended for people to edit talk pages - what people say on talk pages is not for editing. Perhaps someone intended the tag to be on the article? I am just going through Category:Articles with weasel words and doing some tidying up - which includes removing the tag where it is incorrectly placed. Any more queries, please don't hesitate to get in touch. Regards. SilkTork 10:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your response. Some templates about articles go on Talk pages, and it may be that this one was placed there in error for that reason (I didn't look to see who'd done it).  I'll put it on the article. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 11:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)