User talk:Silkyagrawal.1985

Kumar vishwas
Several editors have noticed that this article is in very poor shape, which is why they added the tags at the top of the page. Without a cleanup the article was likely to be deleted. I have cleaned it up as much as possible so please do not revert my edits. I suggest that you read Wikipedia's policies, which are linked on the tags at the top of the article, and make some constructive improvements - for example by wikifying it, adding references, showing the notability of the subject and so on. As it stands it is still likely to be deleted fairly soon unless it is significantly improved. andy 08:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Kumar vishwas
A template has been added to the article Kumar vishwas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. andy 09:23, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Final attempt to clean up Kumar vishwas
Your recent edits to Kumar vishwas improved the article slightly but there is a very long way to go. Here are some pointers:

1. This is an English language encyclopedia so the references must be in English. The references should support the content of the article and allow it to be verified. Wikipedia policy is very clear on this and if the article is not verifiable it will certainly be deleted.

2. Matters of opinion such as the "freshness and purity" of this poet's work must be supported by references.

3. Do not remove "housekeeping" tags such as wikify and cleanup. They are there for a reason.

I have made a final attempt to clean up the article, but it still needs references and a lot of further cleaning. Any editor can nominate it for deletion at any time and without further improvements it is pretty much certain to be deleted. Feel free to make whatevever changes you see fit, but please do not revert the article back to its previous state.

andy 13:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Kumar vishwas
A template has been added to the article Kumar vishwas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author.. 'As I explained previously this article must'' have references in accordance with WP policy. If it's unreferenced then it can and should be deleted.''' andy 07:52, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion debate re Kumar vishwas
An tag has been placed on Kumar vishwas, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. All Wikipedians can join the debate at Articles for deletion, where articles asserted to be inappropriate to Wikipedia are discussed. You are encouraged to submit your opinion, and remember that Articles for Deletion debates are not a vote. You can also leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the deletion tag yourself, but don't feel inhibited from editing the article, particularly if doing so makes it clear that it is a useful contribution to an encyclopaedia. andy 15:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)