User talk:Silly Mrs Gillick

July 2021
Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Talk:Oli London have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Notfrompedro (talk) 22:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gillick, you may be blocked from editing. Notfrompedro (talk) 22:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gillick. Notfrompedro (talk) 22:56, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:59, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 23:14, 16 July 2021 (UTC)