User talk:Sillyporean

Speedy deletion of Sillyporean
A tag has been placed on Sillyporean, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Nonsense, neologism

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rkitko (talk) 08:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. --cjllw | TALK  08:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Rkitko (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Sillyporean and Sinkie
Greetings. Please understand that the above messages serve to notify you that the pages you are creating do not conform with Wikipedia policy. These articles are considered neologisms and Wikipedia has a policy to avoid neologisms. Please also understand our policy against what is called sockpuppetry, using an additional account to edit the same articles to avoid disciplinary action. Please note that Wikipedia also has a policy on sockpuppets as well. Thank you, --Rkitko (talk) 09:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

That's absolutely not true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sillyporean (talk • contribs).

Image:Sinkswimhaze.jpg listed for deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Sinkswimhaze.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission.  While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self-no-disclaimers to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

Redeletion of Sillyporean and Sinkie
Hello. Those two articles have been deleted again, for the reasons previously given. You have been pointed in the direction of the appropriate wikipedia policies and guidelines, to which list I will add What wikipedia is not and not a dictionary of non-notable and unverifiable neologisms for your review and understanding of what constitutes inappropriate content. They were deleted, and validly so, even despite your claim to provide "evidence" as to why these are notable and proper, since none has been forthcoming.

If you really insist that these should be restored, then take it to Deletion Review and argue there for their reinstatement. Please do not recreate.

Continuing to ignore wikipedia policy and consensus on what is appropriate around here will result in your being blocked from editing, temporarily or indefinitely. You have already passed the threshhold for due warning, any further edits from this account along those lines will likely incur such a block, without further notice.--cjllw | TALK  15:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)