User talk:Silver1123

Zeitgeist: The Movie
Welcome to Wikipedia, I noticed that you seem to be making some controversial edits to the Zeitgiest: The movie article. This is great and your help is appreciated. However in some of your comments, made on the article talk page and in your edit summaries, you have been very abrupt and at times rude to other editors. I would like to remind you that assume good faith is policy and WP:CIVIL is one of the pillars of wikipedia. I assure you that everyone here is trying to improve the article and make wikipedia the best encylopedia it can be; I think that you'll find that if you work with other editors and try to build consensus your ideas will be accepted much more readily into the article. Also please beware of tigers. Voiceofreason01 (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Silver1123, there's something else that you need to be aware of - Wikipedia's WP:3RR edit war policy. An edit war is when you have 2 or more editors that repeatedly revert an article to a preferred version, with or without discussion on the talk page.  This creates an impossible editing environment.  To prevent this, Wikipedia has a extremely strict policy about reverting.  Generally speaking, if you revert an article more than 3 times in any 24-hour period, you can (and probably will) end up blocked.  This limit is usually called 3RR.  If you see someone getting close or going past that limit, we ask that you warn the person first (kinda like I'm doing here) and to get something started on the talk page.  If they go past the limit, you can request that an admin take a look at the matter by posting on the Edit war noticeboard.


 * If you are in an edit-war (and remember, it always takes at least two editors, so if you know that your version is the right version, you are still as much as fault as the other editor(s). Please keep this in mind - this policy is taken quite seriously.  You are coming close to it on the Zeitgeist article.  Ravensfire ( talk ) 17:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zeitgeist: The Movie, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Zeitgeist: The Movie was changed by Silver1123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879331 on 2010-12-17T19:48:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit war warning on Zeitgeist: The Movie
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Zeitgeist: The Movie. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Multiple editors have disagreed with you - you must get concensus on the talk page for controversial edits. You are close to the 3RR limit, and will be reported if you continue to revert. Ravensfire ( talk ) 20:07, 17 December 2010 (UTC)