User talk:SilverOriel

Edits of MM article
Hey welcome to Wiki my friend! Always nice to see new faces around here and it's always nice to see some bold editing and cleanup.

While I agree with you that because of lack of sourcing most of this section could be removed, I would also suggest that labeling such as "heavily biased" and "fictitious novels" can be itself construed as POV. In context they would only be heavily biased if you are coming from a bias that it was not a marriage between jesus and mary or that the holy grail does not mean the "royal" bloodline of their descendants. These are long standing debates with little reliable info either way. And referring to "fictitious" novels can lead down a path of arguments: it could be said that the bible or quran or any religious text is a "fictitious" novel or tome in it's own right. Again I'm not criticizing the removal because it was unsourced and poorly written. Just giving a helpful heads up. I've seen so many articles of this nature go in the vein of contention when using certain terms that label one way or another. Look forward to seeing more of your work and possibly collaborating in the future. tyvm Pudge MclameO (talk) 08:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)