User talk:Silver seren/Archive 30

Templates on article Keffals when nominated for deletion
I disagree that templates should not be added to an article when the article is nominated for deletion. There is no rule against this, and I don't think it makes the article "look worse during the deletion discussion". On the contrary, I added them for the sake of pointing out specific obvious issues that need to be addressed (like the dubious sourcing), in the hope that the article could be improved and NOT be deleted. Multiple articles nominated for AfD include template tags describing what needs to be improved with the article, (albeit most were added before the article was nominated for AfD,  but not all.) I won't be adding back the template on the Keffals article for the time being, but deleting template tags solely because the article is part of an ongoing AfD discussion doesn't feel like the most justifiable reason. JungleEntity (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Tags existing before are usually part of the reason for AfD nomination. Any tags you want to add after a deletion discussion is opened can be added after the discussion is over with. And if the article is deleted, then there's no need to add the tags at all (obviously). So I stand by my statement that adding tags after a deletion discussion is opened is an attempt to make the article visibly look worse, as it is an unfortunate fact that how an article looks plays a massive role in how a deletion discussion progresses, instead of just on direct notability requirements. So, again, if the article is kept, you can add the tags afterwards. Silver  seren C 18:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Keri Blakinger
Hello! Your submission of Keri Blakinger at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bruxton (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Zita Moulton
Greetings Silver seren. Any chance you could beef this one up with some good newspaper coverage? FloridaArmy (talk) 05:02, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
 * * salute* I shall do my best. Silver  seren C 05:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Artie Belle McGinty
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Keri Blakinger
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 51
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 51, May – June 2022 
 * New library partners
 * SAGE Journals
 * Elsevier ScienceDirect
 * University of Chicago Press
 * Information Processing Society of Japan
 * Feedback requested on this newsletter
 * 1Lib1Ref May 2022

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Sources for Peter Mungai Warui
Hi there! Do you mind me asking how you found those sources for Peter Mungai Warui? I conducted several sources using Google and Newspaper archive with several relevant search terms but didn't find anything.

I wondered if you'd mind sharing your method with me so I can improve my own source searches for future AfDs. Thanks! MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 21:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, ! I didn't do anything special, actually. Same thing Joseph2302 did, a Google search for "Peter Mungai" boxer. The source they found was on the front page of results, but I had to dig onto the 5th page and beyond to get the sources I put in the AfD. It looks like Kenya-related sources don't have very good SEO and so don't get very high on the search results. I didn't even use any of the databases I have access to through The Wikipedia Library (TWL), though now that I check on Proquest through there, looks like there's a lot more available sources there too:
 * Mungai Triumphs
 * Mungai out to defy underdog tag in Rio
 * Rio-bound Kenyan boxers to relocate to Nairobi
 * Boxers feel neglected, cry out loudly for new kit
 * Police, KDF boxers win to seal final slots
 * And that's just from the first page and a half of sources out of 130 results. Not bad. I also don't currently have my Newspapers.com access renewed yet through TWL, so there might be more stuff available there as well. If you don't have a TWL account (though maybe you do already, you did just mention newspaper archives), I would highly recommend applying for one. There's so many different databases to use through it to find sources. It's often practically the only reason I'm able to make articles on more obscure people and subjects, like almost all of the sources I used to make Lou Swarz. Silver  seren C 21:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much! It just goes to show how important it is to dig through several pages of results. I make a living writing SEO articles but it had never occurred to me an entire country would have such poor SEO!
 * I do have a Wikipedia Library account but I've been using Newspaper Archives as opposed to Newspapers.com, which I assume is better, so I'll have to work out getting on that. Thanks for your help, it's very appreciated. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Newspapers.com is more specialized, so you have to directly apply for an account through TWL. If you go to the "Available Collections" tab, you can click the apply button for it and go through the required form there. Hopefully you manage to get it, I've found it to be light years better than Newspaper Archives and also the ability to clip out parts of pages and link to them publicly so everyone can view the clipping is great for sourcing and helping readers access the material at the same time. Silver  seren C 22:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Walker Business College
Any xhance you can oend me a hand on his one? Zora Neale Hurston is said to have been an alumnus. Not sure on others but there are some nice old photos and I think it's an interesting and significant piece of the puzzle for the African American community of Jacksonville. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll take a look once my Newspapers.com subscription gets renewed. Still waiting on that and it makes source searching difficult without it. Silver  seren C 02:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Cool. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Dorli Rainey
 Schwede 66  12:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Zita Moulton
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

 * Thanks! I just enjoy finding sources. It's relaxing, honestly. :P Silver  seren C 03:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 52
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 52, July – August 2022 
 * New instant-access collections:
 * SpringerLink and Springer Nature
 * Project MUSE
 * Taylor & Francis
 * ASHA
 * Loeb
 * Feedback requested on this newsletter

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:21, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Christopher W. Shaw
Hi Silver! What do you think of the notability of Christopher W. Shaw? Seems like he meets GNG, but I wanted to be sure. Are there any biographic profiles on him that can be used to flesh out the article? Best, Thriley (talk) 21:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Seems quite possible. I'll have to do a deeper dive into him. A bit late to get to it tonight, but I will get to it. Silver  seren C 04:34, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Tova Friedman
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 17:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Questioning Collapse
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel Larsen has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel Larsen. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking needed to happen after I made it at the base name and noticed the problem. Thanks for doing that, ! I wasn't sure if it would mess up the AfC submission template. Silver  seren C 20:26, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No. If your question was whether moving/renaming a draft that has been submitted will affect the status of the submission, it will not.  Drafts are commonly renamed/moved for any of a variety of reasons, mostly either to disambiguate them, or because they were incorrectly named, and the template is designed so as to handle moving/renaming of the draft.  This is a common situation, and it usually works correctly.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Dudley Poplak
Thank you so much for your work on Dudley Poplak! For some reason I did not notice it until now. I would have nominated it for DYK otherwise. Best, Thriley (talk) 03:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem. The annoying part for me is that I just know there's more news sources out there on him from the 1960's through the 80's, but they're likely to be in more select UK publications that aren't digitized yet. Silver  seren C 03:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Dawn Dickson
Thanks for your hard work on Dawn Dickson. There is a relevant ANI discussion in progress. I thought I might mention what happened with Dawn Dickson as it was such a waste of everyone's time (and very frustrating)...but wanted to let you know, first. Cielquiparle (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Larsen (mathematician) has been accepted
 Daniel Larsen (mathematician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Daniel_Larsen_(mathematician) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! 97198 (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for GPS Air
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Greetings
Hi Silver, You're more experienced than me here, so I defer to you in your revert. I'll just note that I was neither saying that option X was 'invalid', nor was I editing someone else's comments. I reverted a change to the RFC prompt to avoid it breaking WP:RFCNEUTRAL. It's my understanding that claims that an RFC is malformed are perfectly fine in the discussion, but not appropriate for the prompt itself. I'd like to learn, so I'd earnestly like to know whre I'm wrong. DFlhb (talk) 19:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Why would having an option for saying the RfC is a bad RfC be non-neutral? That is just as neutral of an option as any of the 1-4 options given in the first place. Silver  seren C 20:01, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Because it presents a specific argument (which others have contested), rather than an option. A neutral version would be:
 * Option X: This RfC is malformed.
 * DFlhb (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to just clarify what your edit summary said: it is true that "this RFC is malformed" options were added to prompts on past RSN discussions, or did you mean that proposing that an RFC is malformed (in the discussion) has been done in past RSN discussions? I haven't seen the former, but again defer to your experience. DFlhb (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I've seen "Bad RfC" added as an option in past discussions, yes, along with people simply posing it in the discussion. It happens both ways. Silver  seren C 20:19, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Good to know; I appreciate it. DFlhb (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 53
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 53, September – October 2022 
 * New collections:
 * Edward Elgar
 * E-Yearbook
 * Corriere della Serra
 * Wikilala
 * Collections moved to Library Bundle:
 * Ancestry
 * New feature: Outage notification
 * Spotlight: Collections indexed in EDS

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Simon N. Groot
Hi Silver! I recently was putting some drafts into article space including Simon N. Groot, which was redirected. Groot won the World Food Prize which I think is a major enough award to justify an article even as a short stub. What do you think? Best, Thriley (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * He's definitely notable and meets the GNG, though I feel like you would avoid a lot of the headache you frequently get, Thriley, if you made more complete articles with full sources before moving them to mainspace. :P Silver  seren C 16:44, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It’s true. I’ve dug myself even deeper with more drafts over the last few months. I just can’t seem to stop making drafts! There’s such a crazy amount of really notable people without articles. My plan is to get as many of them as possible into article space and then over the next few years come back later to 5x expand them. I need to return to when I only have a few dozen drafts going, not a few hundred! Thriley (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Non-unacceptable behavior
Hello, I'm GabberFlasted. I wanted to let you know that one or more of contributions, specifically | this edit to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents have been reported to ArbCom because they appear to humanize you. Wikipedians are expected to behave like opinionless bureaucratic automata, particularly on the Noticeboards, where nothing silly ever happens. Editors are expected to perceive other editors as obstructions and potential enemies, and your humanizing actions undermine the core values of The Cabal. If you have any questions, please silently read all project policies and guidelines until you find your answer. Thanks. GabberFlasted (talk) 14:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Simon Groot
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Daniel Larsen (mathematician)
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:William J. McGee
Hi Silver! I haven’t found any good sources for the book Half the Child by William J. McGee. Any chance you could take a look for a source? McGee has been in the news a lot lately commenting on this past week’s air travel debacle. I thought it would be good to get the article out now- I started the draft a few weeks ago. Hope you have a happy new year! Best, Thriley (talk) 17:46, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I've done what I can, . What do you think? Silver  seren C 23:53, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much!! I’ll add some about his books and commentary. Probably will have some fun DYK hooks! Best, Thriley (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tharun Moorthy (January 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tharun Moorthy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tharun_Moorthy Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tharun_Moorthy reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I rewrote the entire article, . Why does the paid editing claims even matter at this point? Silver  seren C 22:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, feel free to re-submit and I'll leave it for another reviewer. Theroadislong (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tharun Moorthy (January 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tharun Moorthy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tharun_Moorthy Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Akevsharma&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tharun_Moorthy reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 01:16, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Nothing Personal
Hey @Silver seren, I apologize for not being aware of the DYK nomination for this article. If I had known, I would have waited a few days before making the AFD nomination. I want to make it clear that I have no personal issues with you or with the subject. My main goal is to address the problem of sock farms and promotional articles. However that is not the primary reason for the nomination. I do believe that this article deserves an AFD nomination and my actions were taken in good faith. Even if it did not involve sock puppetry, I would have nominated this article. I hope you can understand and not take any of this personally. Akevsharma (talk) 01:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

FA is more sinned against than sinning
Thank you for your offer of help on their talk page. Because they have become closely watched please be careful that none of the help you give could be construed by the uncharitable as proxy editing. I don't want either of you to fall foul of folk watching their activities.

I think your offer of help is sound, though it might be even more useful were you to edit some of the pieces you feel to be almost ready with any edits you feel appropriate and then move them to mainspace yourself, tidying the AFC artefacts up after the move. If you feel that is appropriate then it might be better for you to pick drafts of your choice from this search rather than their recommending drafts for you to submit.

I've suggested to them a number of times that their imposed restriction to use AFC should be appealed, but I understand their reasons for not doing so. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * For now, I'm going to go through the AfC process rather than unilaterally moving them to mainspace. But I will definitely be editing them to fix up references and other such things. And I will want there to be good references in the article before submitting. I think working on making sure drafts are proper to be submitted with FA is more beneficial in the long run. Silver  seren C 23:11, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * They work well with co-operation. If I had more interest in the area they edit I would collaborate with them more. I do try to review their drafts, and I accept those I can. Many I pass on as too specialist for my skillset.
 * Regrettably, their early work built the rod for their back, because it was extraordinarily prolific but very much unready. Their skills in writing what we need have improved substantially. Still, sometimes, they drop the referencing ball. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: South River Forest has been accepted
 South River Forest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=South_River_Forest help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tharun Moorthy at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step III of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:04, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 54
The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 54, November – December 2022 
 * New collections:
 * British Newspaper Archive
 * Findmypast
 * University of Michigan Press
 * ACLS
 * Duke University Press
 * 1Lib1Ref 2023
 * Spotlight: EDS Refine Results

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Tharun Moorthy
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Artie Young
Has this subjext received coverage in newspaper? Thanks. Happy February. FloridaArmy (talk) 08:26, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Will be looking into this soon, starting with what S0091 found on the talk page.  Silver  seren C 02:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Draft:George Henderson (farmer)
Hi Silver! Any chance there is an obituary out there for George Henderson (farmer)? Best, Thriley (talk) 01:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * There doesn't appear to be a direct obituary I can find, unfortunately. Here's some stuff I was able to find though:
 * A Forthright Farmer
 * Farming Wisdom
 * Agricultural Education
 * I'm not clever enough to be a farmer
 * Agriculture: The Farming Ladder
 * Profit From Land
 * Young Farmers Are Advised
 * At home down on the farm
 * Young Farmers' Club
 * I hope these prove useful instead, . Silver  seren C 02:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)


 * These are great! Thank you so much for digging those up. Thriley (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for William J. McGee
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

My sincere apology for irrational AfD
I just wanted to write this to tell my deepest apology for a two-week gap within both AfDs involving Speaker Knockerz (noms. #2 and 3). It was just that the second nomination was ineligible due to a speedy delete without consensus. It seems why I have to nominate it again for the third time without reviewing the last votes. I hope you understand. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 20:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Please Miss
-- RoySmith (talk) 07:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Please agf
This isn't me. If you think it is, please ask me directly instead of casting aspersions. I started a talk page conversation about the irrelevant quote, per BRD. Starting an edit war with an IP would just sink the ship of the talk page topic I started. Checking the geo ip on that v6, I'm over 1000 miles away from it. So, please consider the implications of what you said. Thank you Very Average Editor (talk) 07:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

ANI report over worst WP:CIVIL violations I've come across
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Jeppiz (talk) 02:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Third Opinion
Per WP:3 I am informing you that I have requested a third opinion on the content edit for the Rick Berman article now that you have reverted my edit twice without adequately addressing the numerous issues I have pointed out regarding the weakness, insufficiency, lack or reliability, or outright inapplicability of your provided references. I have done all I can to help you avoid defaming a living person based on rumors and I'm done talking to you about it. 47.197.37.230 (talk) 04:45, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, I await the result. Silver  seren C 13:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Requesting inputs
Requesting your inputs about few more queries @ Wikipedia talk:Did you know. &#32;Bookku   (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 55
<span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes

Issue 55, January – February 2023 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em">
 * New bundle partners:
 * Newspapers.com
 * Fold3
 * 1Lib1Ref January report
 * Spotlight: EDS SmartText Searching

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Existential Physics
BorgQueen (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!
I just saw the comment you left on the Dutch page on Eddie Izzard and would like to thank you. Though it wasn't the right place for it, the sentiment is much appreciated. Several requests to ban the bigots were done but they were unfortunately all shot down. I guess there's still a lot of work to do for queer liberation in the country that was the first in the world to legalise gay marriage... Incomprehensible... Mx.Alba (talk) 21:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * For all the good my statement did, sadly. I think it says quite a lot (negatively) about the community over there. Since the things they were saying about LGBT people was just blatant bigotry that would get someone here saying just one of the things they did banned in a heartbeat. The fact that no action was taken about the editor after repeated and multiple statements like that is appalling. If that sort of activity continues on the Dutch language Wikipedia as a whole, I really do think that we may need a Foundation intervention in the future, because it implies the admins there are rotten to the core. Silver  seren C 22:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Seriously though, just one comment like this would have someone rightfully topic-banned at minimum for POV pushing over here.
 * "Well, the cancel culture in full swing : silence anyone who disagrees with the prevailing ideas about transgenderism (= transgender ideology)! Who do I think I am with my carefully reasoned criticism? It is no wonder that Orwell's 1984 is often referred to in discussions on this subject . War is peace, two plus two is five, criticism is hate, a man is a woman."
 * It's just so blatant. Silver  seren C 22:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * And then this being an example of how the admin community there is broken: Not performed - Transphobia is not a reason for blocking. Silver  seren C 22:59, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Imagine how it was for me being on the receiving end of all that as a trans person and getting a ban for calling it out... Mx.Alba (talk) 05:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * It's just ridiculous. At least there were a couple people standing up for you there, but the fact that no one was addressing that editor's repeated statements, many far worse than the one I quoted here, is just...ugh. Sorry that you had to go through that. Hopefully bigots like them actually get dealt with eventually, for the benefit of the encyclopedia as a whole. At least the article finally has the right name in the lede and pronouns now, even if it took over a year to accomplish. Silver  seren C 05:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I would apologise on behalf of my national wiki but I'll be honest, there's a reason I very rarely edit there. Thank you for your valiant effort, though PS: not all hope is lost --Licks-rocks (talk) 09:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)