User talk:Silvermane

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

Why did you remove the hypertext link for Ginette Harrison in List of climbers without providing a reason? I knew there was no existing article yet for her so I left it as an external link that could be used as the starting point for an article. If you are going to do that, at least move the link to the page's Talk page so that info is not lost. Thanks. RedWolf 19:46, Feb 7, 2004 (UTC)

Article now written Silvermane 19:57, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * Okay, my apologies if this was your original intent and I jumped the gun a bit. I create the article first and then go back and fix any links that need it. List of climbers is on my watchlist so I noticed your change pretty quickly (not that I'm always looking at my watchlist!) RedWolf 04:00, Feb 8, 2004 (UTC)

--

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to mark in articles such as West Beleriand that it is a fictional place. thanks -- Tarquin 13:33, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hello,

Are you aware that redirects only require one '#' before the word REDIRECT? I've corrected a couple that you have created now. -- Graham :) | Talk 23:15, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)

An anon user tried to write this to you: nie moge spac i mysle o tobie, jaka szkoda, ze nie jestes ze mna:-( tak bym chciala abys tutaj byl / sms.de

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Bane
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Bane, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Middle-earth rivers
An editor has nominated List of Middle-earth rivers, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Haldir (First Age)


The article Haldir (First Age) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence this fictional character passes WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. Pure WP:PLOT"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Middle-earth rivers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Middle-earth rivers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Middle-earth rivers& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:04, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Voronwë for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voronwë is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Voronwë until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 16:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

"Esgalduin" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Esgalduin. Since you had some involvement with the Esgalduin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 06:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

"Kibil-nâla" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kibil-nâla. Since you had some involvement with the Kibil-nâla redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 02:12, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barovia


The article Barovia has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ecthelion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ecthelion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ecthelion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 05:01, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Niënor Níniel for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niënor Níniel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Niënor Níniel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hog Farm (talk) 20:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

"Teiglin" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Teiglin. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)