User talk:Silvioprog

Speedy deletion nomination of Brook framework
Hello Silvioprog,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Brook framework for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kebabipita (talk) 20:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Creating empty articles
Hi there. I don't think you're allowed to create articles that are under construction. You should instead write the article in your sandbox (can be found on the top right of your screen) and then create it when you're done. Kebabipita (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Brook framework
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:12, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Brook framework with this edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  21:17, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Brook framework
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Brook framework. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Brook framework with this edit. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  21:55, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Brook framework
This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Brook framework, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brook framework


A tag has been placed on Brook framework requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://github.com/silvioprog/brookframework. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:01, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Why your page was deleted
If the reasons that Brook framework was deleted were unclear, here's my attempt at explaining it:
 * You copy-pasted the article here from Github. We don't accept copy-pastes from other websites on the grounds of copyright infringement.
 * There were no references at all in the article. If you want to make an article on something, it can't have just its official website as a source. It must have third-party coverage. Please read Verifiability and Identifying reliable sources.
 * The article was not written objectively, it was written like an advertisement - which isn't allowed here. If you write an article again, avoid words/phrases like "perfect" and "you will appreciate," etc. Wikipedia is not for getting the word out about your project - it is to act as a collection of information on something that already has a reasonable amount of third-party coverage.

As the article stood when it was deleted, there's no reason your page should be undeleted at this point. It was in clear violation of these.

Additionally, if you are only here to promote your project, and not to help contribute to Wikipedia, you stand in a conflict of interest. If the Brook framework really is popular/covered enough, someone else will write the article for you. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask at the Wikipedia help desk.  Protoss  Pylon  22:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Now Brook documentation is under CC-BY-SA-3.0 license
Hello,

Now the Brook documentation is under CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. The change can be conferred on the project homepage:

http://silvioprog.github.io/brookframework

Thank you!

WP:USERFY
Article now as a draft for you at User:Silvioprog/Brook framework  Ron h jones  (Talk) 21:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Silvioprog/Brook framework


A tag has been placed on User:Silvioprog/Brook framework requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC)