User talk:Simackh

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Powel House, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 03:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Manual of Style

Re: Welcome
Hi Dori,

I was not trying to advertise, I was providing links back to pages that I thought would be helpful to those researching the subjects of the pages that I added the links to. I thought this would be useful since not only do the links provide an image of the building, but we also include georeferences, which indicate on a modern-day map where these buildings once stood. There are also inscriptions by the artist of the watercolors describing certain details about the buildings, such as notable people who visited, changes in ownership, etc. I (and others at the Historical Society) figured people might find these details interesting, so this is why we added them to Wikipedia. Is there anything I could do differently if my links came off looking like an advertisement for the Historical Society? Thanks. Simackh (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Why not just add the relevant information directly to the articles? Recommended reading: Wikipedia's guidelines on External links. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 22:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, in many cases there is additional information about the specific image(s) and the location I am linking to. This information is periodically updated as projects are completed.  Additionally, I do not have permission to post the actual images to Wikipedia.  The information on the links also contains access to other information at the historical society that is relevant to the building/place/person but not necessarily the Wikipedia article.  There is often too much information and in most cases copyright restrictions that make it not possible to add the info to the main article.  I don't see how posting these links is unacceptable when it seems to fall under the category of "information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to its accuracy," as stated on the External Links guidelines page, or "Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks), or other reasons," under "What Can Normally Be Linked" on the same page.

If you still feel that the links I posted are inappropriate, you may contact my supervisor at mshoemaker@hsp.org. The Historical Society has posted links like these in the past and it has never before been an issue. Simackh (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)