User talk:SimeonLumgair

Speedy deletion of New Cassettes
A tag has been placed on New Cassettes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 14:15, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Looks like this article has been deleted once already. You should probably get your resources together before creating the article. Please review WP:NOT for some helpful tips on what exactly Notability is in the Wikipedia environment. -- KingNewbs (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Andrew Harrison
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andrew Harrison, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.actorum.com/ah.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 10:50, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi! I have edited the infringing text in this article and removed the copvio tag.  Wikipedia has firm policies against the use of copyright material without permission and I suggest that you take a little time to familiarise yourself with this and other policies.  If you have any connection with the subject of the the article, for instance, it would be worth making sure that you understand the guidelines for editing with a potential conflict of interest.  I've added a "Welcome" message below these other messages and you will find some really useful information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines if you follow the links it contains.  If you have any queries about this message, just post below this one and I will reply here.--CharlieDelta (talk) 20:18, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Harrison


The article Andrew Harrison has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Closedmouth (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Stepping Stone Film Festival


The article The Stepping Stone Film Festival has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENT. No explanation of why festival is notable, and no claims to notability aside stating this is an international event, a claim for which there are no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  20:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Other Venice Film Festival


The article The Other Venice Film Festival has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article fails WP:GNG and WP:EVENT. No explanation of why festival is notable, and no claims to notability aside stating this is an international event, a claim for which there are no sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  20:22, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Stepping Stones Film Festival


A tag has been placed on The Stepping Stones Film Festival, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Duplicate content as found in The Stepping Stone Film Festival

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WingtipvorteX  PTT   ∅  20:23, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Derelict (film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derelict (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Derelict (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Bdb484 (talk) 20:56, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, SimeonLumgair. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:24, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I noticed that you appear to be the director and I don't see where anyone has ever really explained COI to you. As the above information says, it's easy to get tied into things that you are closely tied to. It's easy to see notability where there might not be any or be tempted to make something more flattering than it should be. It's why there are certain subjects I'll probably never be able to edit here on Wikipedia if they ever gain enough notability to be added. What I can recommend is that when trying to add articles about things you're involved with, try going through the film wikiproject (WP:FILM) for assistance. They can help prevent any potential COI or such. I personally recommend the user MichaelQSchmidt as a mentor. He's very fluent in knowing where to look for sources, what works and doesn't, and pretty much all of the ins and outs of film notability and notability in general.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:27, 15 November 2012 (UTC)