User talk:Simert Ove

Notification
In addition, as a result of a recent ruling, all IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. RolandR (talk) 01:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration request
Since, despite the notification above, you persist in editing an article which you are not permitted to edit, I have reported your account at the Arbitration notification noticeboard. RolandR (talk) 01:00, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Your recent editing history at Israel Shahak shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You've already violated the WP:ARBPIA3 restriction that doesn't permit you to edit the article at all, and the one-revert restriction that limits all editors to one revert in any 24-hour period. If you edit the article ever again, I will report you for edit-warring.'' — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 03:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

1RR violation at Israel Shahak
To enforce an arbitration decision and for 1RR violation at Israel Shahak, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." This block is for WP:1RR violation. The full report is at Arbitration Enforcement. As a reminder you may not edit any ARBPIA articles such as Israel Shahak unless you have been here 30 days and have 500 edits. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:17, 12 October 2016 (UTC)